FME vs. Sales Performance Management solutions from SAP SuccessFactors

I created the FME script to generate the centerline polyline. It works very well and faster than we used the Esri api from the code side.

Incentivized

SAP Sales Performance Management from Success Factors works great if the incentive calculation is simple. However, if it contains a lot of constraints and filters or is dynamic, it is not friendly to changes or complexity in terms of configuration and time to calculate the incentives. The advantages of using SAP Sales Performance Management are that the process is controlled, the data is in the cloud, and the roles and permissions make it more secure.

Incentivized

• I used that to create the polyline
• Used that to do the reprojection
• Used that to extract spatial data
• Used that to do the intersect
• Used that to do the locate

Incentivized

• SAP's Incentive Management solution helps accurate and timely commission calculation
• SAP's Territory and Quota solution helps optimize and balance territories and streamline quota distribution.
• SAP's Analytics Platform is best in class platform in the SPM industry.
• SAP's Enterprise Workflow allows streamlining of the End To End Business Process Automation

Incentivized

• Should allow script to change the database connection
• Should provide more details and user friendly error log information

Incentivized

• Using names to reference payees in the compensation platform, instead of their ID
• Allow an Advisor to see their compensation as well as how their employees compensation without requiring to proxy
• Expose all variables within the application to the dashboard, to allow them to be used for data insights, without requiring any extra work.

Incentivized

I would use this product if it were needed due to very complex plans/organization

My rating is because even though the system works well and has many good features as far as the regular hierarchy, ability to enter fixed variables and the use of rate and lookup tables, there are few sticking points. The custom hierarchy is not easy to use as it is not just point and click. Also, the rule writing is difficult and requires a lot of testing to ensure the results are what you are expecting to calculate or pay.

Incentivized

FME not only be able to do the data transfer and transformation, but also be able to perform the spatial process. Astera cannot do the spatial process at the moment.

Incentivized

We wanted a commission system that was designed for commissions and required limited configuration. SAP Commissions is just that.

1. Ananplan is more of a financial software that can be used for commissions.
2. Iconixx and Xactly are comparable to SAP Commissions but seemed to be built more for small to mid-size customers.
3. Variacent required too much up front configuration work. It was not ready to use out of the box.

• Easy to create and easy to understand when compare to the Esri api code
• Difficult to debug when the error happens

Incentivized

• The efficiencies gained by moving from reports and spreadsheet alone has earned us a positive ROI.
• SAP Commissions speed to the market allows us to quickly and cheaply change our direction to meet market demands.
• Our sales force's engagement has drastically improved. We are now paying monthly instead of quarterly and have earned their trust.