Freshsuccess vs. UserIQ

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Freshsuccess
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Freshsuccess (based on technology acquired by Natero by Freshworks in May 2019) is designed to help Customer Success Managers prevent churn, increase account expansion, and manage more customers with less effort. The vendor says features include: Customer 360 - See customer emails, chats, meetings, support tickets, billing history, and product usage, in one place. Predictive Alerts - Predict which customers are likely to churn, convert, or expand their…
$79
per month per user
UserIQ
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
UserIQ is a walkthrough tool that aims to empower SaaS companies to deliver what each user needs to be successful in every moment, starting with adoption. According to the vendor, key benefits include: effectively scale onboarding increase feature usage accelerate time-to-value ultimately drive more revenue throughout the customer journeyN/A
Pricing
FreshsuccessUserIQ
Editions & Modules
Estate
$79 billed annually
per month per user
Estate
$95 billed monthly
per month per user
Forest
$129 billed annually
per month per user
Forest
$150 billed monthly
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
FreshsuccessUserIQ
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
FreshsuccessUserIQ
Considered Both Products
Freshsuccess
Chose Freshsuccess
Gainsight had all of the functionality but had the price tag to match. Churnzero and ClientSuccess were also very close, and we nearly chose one of those. We didn't love the UI of ChurnZero and ClientSuccess had the best UI by far but was lacking in some of the functionality …
Chose Freshsuccess
We initially looked at Gainsight, Amity, and another which I can't remember the name of. Only Natero and Amity were within a reasonable price range. We selected Natero because the platform was significantly more polished, the reporting seemed significantly stronger in Natero, …
Chose Freshsuccess
I highly recommend and prefer using Salesforce over Natero. Salesforce allows me to pull in as many fields into a report as I would like, compared to 14 different fields into Natero. I am able to view and make changes to information much quicker than Natero. I like Salesforce …
Chose Freshsuccess
I was not a part of the Natero selection group. In the past, I've used more project management focused tools that have much more detailed options for workflows, tasks and visualizations of those pieces. This is a large gap for me. Natero has an integration to pull from SFDC, …
Chose Freshsuccess
Natero is specifically built for customer success, other tools are merely capable of some of its functions. A tool like Pendo does a great job at aiding the product manager and helps to identify features and modules that are popular, but this doesn't translate into customer …
Chose Freshsuccess
Can't really say that, at the time I had natero I was evaluating [other] options.
UserIQ
Chose UserIQ
When comparing with the other product of the market we realize UserIQ brings the best outcome beneath the price so we choose UserIQ apart from other products.
Chose UserIQ
N/A - have not previously used other products in this field which compare. It is a new product to us.
Chose UserIQ
We use both for different reasons. GA is our primary customer usage product in our b2c apps since it's pricing is not restrictive by number of users. The dashboards and metrics tracked in user IQ are more accessible and you're able to track at the feature level much easier. …
Features
FreshsuccessUserIQ
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
UserIQ
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Role-based user permissions10.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
7.1
Ratings
20% below category average
UserIQ
9.3
Ratings
7% above category average
API7.20 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Integration with Salesforce.com7.20 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integration with Marketo7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integration with Eloqua7.00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Customer Data Extraction / Integration
Comparison of Customer Data Extraction / Integration features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
8.6
Ratings
3% below category average
UserIQ
7.8
Ratings
13% below category average
Product usage8.10 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Help desk / support tickets9.10 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Customer Success Management
Comparison of Customer Success Management features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
7.1
Ratings
20% below category average
UserIQ
8.0
Ratings
8% below category average
NPS surveys7.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Sponsor tracking7.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customer profiles7.10 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Automated workflow8.00 Ratings6.10 Ratings
Internal collaboration5.30 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customer health scoring8.10 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Customer segmentation7.20 Ratings7.50 Ratings
CSM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CSM Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Freshsuccess
7.4
Ratings
16% below category average
UserIQ
9.5
Ratings
9% above category average
Customer health trends9.10 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Engagement analytics7.00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Revenue forecasting4.40 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Dashboards9.10 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Best Alternatives
FreshsuccessUserIQ
Small Businesses
ChurnZero
ChurnZero
Score 9.6 out of 10
ChurnZero
ChurnZero
Score 9.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
CustomerSuccessBox
CustomerSuccessBox
Score 9.5 out of 10
CustomerSuccessBox
CustomerSuccessBox
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Gainsight CS
Gainsight CS
Score 8.9 out of 10
Gainsight CS
Gainsight CS
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
FreshsuccessUserIQ
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
FreshsuccessUserIQ
Likelihood to Recommend
  • Natero does an excellent job of reporting and having a lot of the data available. They don't do as well when you want to track specific metrics such as ARR. (Everything in the application is currently based in MRR)
  • Natero has done an excellent job for our smaller organization. I am not sure how it would work with a larger organization.
Read full review
User IQ is appropriate particularly for unlocking insights into information about the customer without any problems, like mentioned previously the health dashboard is particularly liked within the business. On the visual side, It is also strong as it is fairly simple to use. Perhaps one less suitable is to actually present this data informal settings, as the output isn't suited for this.
Read full review
Pros
  • Love the accounts view to see all my accounts, their health and some helpful stats!
  • The charting is relevant and detailed for customers to understand their usage of our product. The look and feel is very clean and easy to understand.
  • In the account, you can link to other documentation, which is great!
Read full review
  • Customer service is excellent.
  • Once you get the hang out using the walkthroughs, they are really beneficial.
  • Running reports of users on surveys!
Read full review
Cons
  • It's a complex platform, it can be hard to find what you're looking for if you don't know where to look.
  • There have been a few features which work correctly but can be a bit confusing to get working correctly. Fortunately, the support team is so on it, we get an answer within an hour.
  • I would have liked Natero to have a mechanism in place to nudge users of the platform to use it. This would help with getting adoption on our end. While the onboarding documentation was great, a more hands-on approach to getting users to adopt and use the platform would have helped us get up to speed earlier. It took us nearly 9 months to really start using the system which is partially due to the complexity of the integration process and partially due to the difficulty of switching over CES processes into Natero.
Read full review
  • Adding Heat mapping/Scroll tracking/Live user session viewing - I think this could give me further options for segmentation and give me higher visibility of where customers may be facing difficulties when creating further in-app messaging.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
This rating is given as to a certain degree it is useful - as in the customer health dashboard and providing a very fast service which is easy to use for our users. However, as mentioned prior, the exportation of this data into presentable information (presentation style) is not really possible without doing yourself via screenshots and interpreting the data.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Customer service and support is one of the biggest strengths for UserIQ, whenever there has been any issues or confusion, the help service is very effective and friendly to support us and get to a conclusion within no time, hence why the ranking given is extremely high for this factor. I would not say any improvement is needed in terms of this aspect of the company.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We initially looked at Gainsight, Amity, and another which I can't remember the name of. Only Natero and Amity were within a reasonable price range. We selected Natero because the platform was significantly more polished, the reporting seemed significantly stronger in Natero, and during the sales process Natero did a better job of showing us how the functionality would work, whereas our calls with Amity were frequently filled with "it doesn't work because this is a demo account" which was a bit of a red flag.
Read full review
When comparing with the other product of the market we realize UserIQ brings the best outcome beneath the price so we choose UserIQ apart from other products.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's made my job harder.
  • It's made it harder to update my customer's information.
  • It's made me spend more time deleting information to satisfy the character limit.
Read full review
  • We've been able to identify clients who are missing value in our product based on health scores and usage.
  • Expensive product for the value it's delivering to the Product Team but may make it back in ease of use over Google Analytics and other competitors.
  • Often have spent resources trying to troubleshoot when something breaks. Would prefer a little more stability although some of that may be user error.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Freshsuccess Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of