Google Content Experiments was a tool that can be used to create A/B test from within Google Analytics. It has been discontinued since 2019, and Google now recommends using its Google Optimize service for A/B testing.
N/A
Instapage
Score 7.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Instapage is used by marketers to create, optimize, and personalize landing pages without coding skills. With its built-in optimization tools like A/B Testing, Ad-to-Page Personalization, and Heatmaps, marketers can launch more campaigns faster and accelerate their conversions.
$99
per month 15,000 unique monthly visitors
Pricing
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Create
$99
per month 15,000 unique monthly visitors
Optimize
starting at $199
per month starting with 30,000 unique monthly visitors
Convert
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
20% discount for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Considered Both Products
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Google Content Experiments is a free tool and the leading tool in the industry. It's pretty simple to set up a test and use content experiments to monitor objectives once Google Analytics is installed. Less experienced team members can run tests with some training. There are …
It frankly was down to cost. Other platforms offer better targeting etc., however, we found that unless we could demonstrate early value - we didn't get budget sign off. Our teams aren't usually large enough to justify the cost and time to invest in a more complex platform - so …
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
Google Content Experiment cannot compete with Adobe Test and Target, Quadratics or even Optimizley. It is harder to use with no editing interface, so pages must be actually developed. It doesn't allow for any advanced segmenting or multivarient testing. But it is free, so …
Google CE is free, Optimizely isn't plus only until recently I found out that Optimizely can work with multiple goals, however, this was found by meeting their employees at a trade show and not via their website.
We'd use content experiments as a complimentary testing tool alongside more comprehensive testing packages out there. As a free testing tool it does the job for basic A/B testing.
If you are looking for a more advanced great value for money solution I would recommend investigating Visual Website Optimizer. For a more powerful enterprise level solution with the option to have a fully managed service I would recommend Maxymiser.
Google Content Experiments provides significantly more insight, historical data and analysis than Unbounce. However, if you do need a solution that offers a WYSIWYG editor, landing page hosting, and limited reporting and testing, Unbounce is a good all-in-one solution and that …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
GCE isn't better or worse than any of these, it's just different. When I have the time to build a new page, setup the testing scripts, and go - then I'll use GCE. If I'm doing multivariate I use VWO. If I'm testing a quick button or headline change, I use Optimizely or UnBounce.
Google CE does a great job streamlining tools and features. Optimizely does not offer nearly the same amount of tools or resources that G CE does. I would use CE in the future but stay away from Optimizely. Google also has a lot more resources for accruing knowledge on it …
Instapage is a more complete package with an editor function, a large selection of multi-component templates, a reporting dashboard, basic SEO tools, customization functionality and excellent site speed and site performance standards. We choose Instapage because it had all …
I prefer Unbounce to Instapage even though the end result may be a nicer-looking page, the pages are not the desired outcome. Lead generation and engagement trump design, for all intents and purposes. So don't focus on the best-looking page as long as the pages are good clean …
The Instapage editor is super flexible and easy to use. You can move any element to any spot on the canvas. Instapage and Unbounce have better editors when it comes to flexibility and control. Leadpages and HubSpot offer visual drag-and-drop design but both of them are more …
We also use MailChimp's new functionality to build landing pages. It has some advantages since we use MailChimp as our email marketing system. However it is not as user-friendly as Instapage - and we only use it for certain simple campaigns that don't need us to be creative …
I know there are a lot of options for building quick landing pages out there, but Instapage makes it so easy to use. Think of them like Apple, the clean, friendly, easy to use option. Everyone else seems to make this a little more complex than I think it needs to be.
Instapage is much more user-friendly than landingi, and is much less glitchy than Wix. As such, Instapage is likely the strongest and most productive for ROI of all of the landing page software solutions. Would strongly recommend this, despite the higher price tag, it is well …
Prior to using Instapage, I had only ever used Unbounce. I wanted to see what other tools brought to the table and Instapage was the one we went with at first. I prefer Instapage's interface to Unbounce, but the underlying functionality turned out to not be the best fit for our …
Optimizely - More expensive and responsive functionality is less reliable. The WYSIWYG editor is also a little more difficult to use and many times requires custom coding for desired experience. The A/B testing tools are a little more sophisticated, but Instapage is sufficient …
I found Instapage and Leadpages similar in a lot of ways. Both are good solutions. Instapage has a little better of a drag n drop builder. A little more flexible. Leadpages actively restricted form embed code to upsell their integration packages. Not cool IMO.
Clickfunnels for more complex funnels and sales pages, Insatpage for simple opt ins, and I use dont use leadpages at all in anymore. It just didn't have the quality and I customization I was looking for.
When we first realized we needed a way to build landing pages for our ad campaigns, Instapage was one of the first products we came across. With the CMS we use, we have outside developers who help manage the back end of the site. It was not in our budget to have them create our …
Instapage is the easiest to use. It is also the cheapest. Instapage is the most flexible for customizing the mobile versions of your page (you can make changes on the mobile version without ever having it change the desktop version without you knowing). It also seems to be the …
Because of its ease of use, Instapage remains a staple in our marketing stack. While we are using native landing pages in Wordpress more and more (because we have more skill and resources) and implementing the landing page page builder in Sharpspring, if we got into a pinch …
HubSpot was terrible because it required a lot of coding experience if you wanted to work outside the given 4-5 templates. If you wanted a new template built, or to rebrand existing templates, they charged you. Very inflexible program and was very challenged by it. Our main …
I can't remember all the alternatives we looked at. It was a long time ago, and there were a lot. The number one competitor was LeadPages... and then there were a few that were WordPress plugins that we seriously looked at. We passed all of them up in favour of Instapages …
GetResponse is a little easier to use and see how pages work out across the different devices, and it is significantly more expensive than GetResponse. However, it is much more affordable than Sales Engine and Callidus Cloud Marketing Automation - which are full marketing …
We are SharpSpring clients and love many aspects of their marketing automation platform. Because their landing page features and functionality need some refining, we still use Instapage frequently to service our clients' needs. We plan to use Instapage for as long as we need to …
I've used OptimizePress as well, but I like the ease of editing even more with Instapage, and there are a lot of great templates and preloaded dummy content.
Before finding Instapage, we used literally every landing page builder out there. NONE of them offered a free getting started plan. They all want to take your credit card and hold a deposit hostage in case you don't like their system. Well I NEVER try anything without a free …
Features
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
Instapage
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.2
Ratings
11% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
8.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
10.0
Ratings
16% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
9.9
Ratings
16% above category average
Instapage
-
Ratings
Click analytics
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
9.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
10.00 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO and Conversion Optimization
Comparison of SEO and Conversion Optimization features of Product A and Product B
Google Content Experiments is suited for large and small organizations, no matter your organizational goals. It is not recommended for organizations that are only interested in qualitative data, as there are other tools for receiving specific user experience feedback. It is also not recommended that you implement tests without some sort of goal in mind.
If you aren't too picky about having precise control over your page designs, Instapage is a great tool that will make it easy to build and publish pages quickly. It's easy to set up and intuitive to use. It seems like that audience (prioritizes speed over precision) is their target -- for control freaks like me, it comes up a little short. The pricing is pretty good for what you get -- a super-fast path to getting campaigns out quickly so that you can test and iterate your way to profitability. It plays really well with most other tools designed for the small, scrappy startup marketing team, too.
When you need to measure against event-based goals
If you need to see how the test variations performed against secondary goals
Given that the the platform requires you actually code a new page with a unique URL, this tool can be good for radical redesigns.
Great insights into other information about your testing groups, like whether or not they're mobile, screen size, browser, or really any dimension available in GA.
I love how easy the setup was. The drag and drop design is easy for people who don't know code but it also allows coding options for those who do.
Customer service has been easy to contact. They are quick with their response times and have suggested workarounds or provided videos to help fix any issues.
They are constantly working on improvements to the interface and additional features.
Originally, we used Pardot and Instapage and I had to pull the coding from our Instapage landing pages and throw that into Pardot to get nice looking landing pages. When we transitioned to HubSpot, they took our existing pages and did this for us. But now they added an integration with Instapage and I am guessing this will solve any issues with using Instapage going forward for our website's landing pages.
Content Experiments just makes it is simple and easy to implement A|B tests. We will be evaluating other tools in search of a more robust system for multivariate and cross-page testing, such as Optimizely or Visual Website Optimizer. However, for basic testing, you can't really beat it.
I've tried all of the other landing page services on the market, and this is literally the easiest to use. I am not a designer or software developer, just a simple guy and if I can learn how to use it, anyone can. That's what won me over. Their support and pre-made templates are awesome, but the usability is what I love!
Using the free tool, overall "live support" is limited. However, there are plenty of online resources to get started. If you need handheld support, it is best to upgrade the service or hire a developer through one of Google's partner agencies. There could be more support for understanding what makes a test useful or not.
Google Website Optimizer was a better product but has been discontinued. We have also used Test and Target , which has more features but we have been doing fine with Google Content Experiments. Most testing situations can be handled with Google Content Experiments.
We also use Mailchimp's new functionality to build landing pages. It has some advantages since we use Mailchimp as our email marketing system. However it is not as user-friendly as Instapage - and we only use it for certain simple campaigns that don't need us to be creative with the landing pages. I wouldn't recommend Mailchimp as an alternative to what Instapage brings to the table!
Doing good experiments/Optimize has helped to take out the guesswork of the things we want to implement.
We have done fairly complex changes such as changing navigation and managed to see improvements outcomes immediately before we have to request developer.
Our teams have become more data centric in how they approach changes.
My company was so disorganized, calculating ROI was never going to happen. However, Instapage did allow us to meet our goal, which was to acquire a specific number of leads within a month.
Instapage allowed me to make quick changes based on lead collection progress. When we were behind on our numbers, I could quickly make changes and A/B test different page layouts.
I'm not sure if they continued to use Instapage after I left the company, but it was a very helpful lead collection tool and allowed us to meet our goals.