TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Gusto

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AGusto offers payroll, benefits and compliance capabilities. Gusto is scaled for small to mid-sized businesses, and emphasizes an easy to use interface.

    $49

    per month

    TriNet

    Score4.5 out of 10
    N/ATriNet provides small and medium size businesses (SMBs) with full-service HR and payroll solutions tailored by industry. TriNet also offers specialized services through client access to HR representatives for advice and notifications on impactful regulatory changes.N/A
    Pricing
    GustoTriNet
    Editions & Modules
    Simple: A streamlined set of automatic payroll features and benefits integrations
    $49/month + $6/mo per person
    per month
    Plus: Comprehensive payroll, benefits, and HR tools for employers building a great place to work
    $80/month + $12/mo per person
    per month
    Premium: Scalable payroll and benefits, expert HR, and dedicated support for the complex needs of growing teams
    $180/month + $22/mo per person
    per month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    GustoTriNet
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsGusto offers three pricing plans for payroll, benefits, and HR.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    GustoTriNet
    Considered Both Products
    Gusto
    Chose Gusto
    TriNet is definitely a more robust platform that offers better benefit options, however Gusto is more cost effective and simple to use. Also, TriNet customer service isn't the best. I haven't had to use Gusto's customer service for anything, so I'm not sure how it compares but …
    Incentivized
    Chose Gusto
    Payroll is on par, however, the benefits management is not even close. BambooHR and TriNet both offered better benefit plans and over the course of years, never caused my teams to be uninsured for any period of time. BambooHR and TriNet support teams have always communicated …
    Incentivized
    Chose Gusto
    My employer had already selected Gusto. I would say it's about the same, but the UX is better. TriNet has a better benefit page that clearly breaks down what is included in your insurance. I got a much better monthly payment for similar health insurance with Gusto than I did …
    Incentivized
    Chose Gusto
    Gusto is the easiest to use out of all the payroll programs that I have tried out at various companies. Manually entering time is less complicated and requires less time on gusto than on the others.
    Incentivized
    Chose Gusto
    Gusto has been my favorite option both as an end-user (ie. employee) and admin (ie. employer). It's easy to use, has all the features we need, integrates with Guideline (our preferred 401k provider), and priced well for great value.
    Incentivized
    Chose Gusto
    Gusto was affordable and worked the best for what our organization needed. We only have four employees, so we didn't want something expensive or hard to use. Gusto is easy and works for us!
    Incentivized
    TriNet
    Chose TriNet
    We found TriNet to be easier to understand and set up than Gusto.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet has way more features and functionalities than Gusto. Specifically, the HR function is a big life from mine and the VP of Operations shoulders, and it's nice to have an HR function where we can direct the team to.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet is a less modern interface and less friendly UI than Gusto and Deel
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    Trinet has more features than Gusto and QuickBooks Online as far as HR reporting, census, off-cycle payroll, tax reports etc. But the biggest thing it doesn't have that all of these other do is a live chat feature that is completely necessary for immediate payroll issues that …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    Out of all of the platforms, I still think that Gusto is the most user friendly for employers and employees. However, they did not provide the support that I get with TriNet. In just a year, I feel that TriNet is listening to it clients and have already made changes to improve …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    I looked into Gusto, Concierge, but then I started seeing terrible reviews from my colleagues who utilize their service so I did not pursue a relationship with them.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    When Astrolabe was founded we used Gusto. They have a slick portal and they are significantly cheaper than TriNet (order of magnitude or more). Unfortunately, Gusto does not provide small companies (less than 5 employees) with benefits or any concrete HR services other than …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    Gusto is geared more specifically to small businesses, which would service the majority of my clients. I find their platform and customer service are also quite good. Since they are more geared to a small business, under 5 employees, the cost difference is helpful for those …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    I use Gusto for a non-profit client. It's fine as a payroll service, but is not as comprehensive as a PEO in the HR management arena.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet has quite a bit more functionality, albeit at a greater cost. For those companies moving from small to medium in size, TriNet is likely the better solution. For those that are very small, Gusto may be the better solution. Both should be evaluated side by side for each …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    Both Insperity and TriNet have failed us in the same and different ways. Justworks was initially more expensive for benefits than TriNet. However, TriNet's benefits renewed with an average 10% increase, so we did not see savings for very long. If we could just be free of a …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    Neither are as robust or as easy to use as Trinet. Customer service is not nearly as good as TriNet.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    We thought the PEO route was the way to go, but for our smaller company it was a mistake I believe.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    Better benefit offerings
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    Very bottom of the list - I did not select TriNet, as I joined the company after it had already been implemented and in use for some time. If I had been involved, Rippling and/or Zenefits would have been my top choices due to their wide breadth of HR/Payroll/People support …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet has fulfilled our requirements and making a switch would require us to change our benefit offerings quite a bit. From that standpoint, it paid to stay with TriNet. They also have been extremely responsive and we enjoy the level of support we receive. The only issue we …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet by far is superior in terms of service and platform. Their focus on state and federal compliance is unparalleled compared to the other products I have used in the past.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet had a more comprehensive approach and their online platform was very intuitive!
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet's level of customer service and pricepoint is superior to the other companies we researched.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    I think TriNet is the most streamlined and the most cost-effective. It also offers the best support for both employees and for the employer.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    each has their strong suites and weaknesses.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    We are switching to Gusto.
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    We have used Zenefits and Gusto in the past. They were ok but didn't have the complete suite of features that we were looking for. The only advantage Gusto has over TriNet is that contractor payments and 1099 generation is built in and handled by their service on regular …
    Incentivized
    Chose TriNet
    TriNet was the clear choice (vs Insperity, ADP, Gusto, PayChex).
    Insperity's reporting and customer service (as experienced at a different client) were horrible, and the fees were hidden.
    ADP's PEO service didn't seem robust enough at the time (although we have not reviewed the …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    GustoTriNet
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    9.2
    514 Ratings
    TriNet
    4.0
    731 Ratings
    Pay calculation9.6493 Ratings2.5705 Ratings
    Support for external payroll vendors8.58 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration8.9358 Ratings3.2716 Ratings
    Direct deposit files9.5497 Ratings4.9665 Ratings
    Salary revision and increment management9.4383 Ratings3.8586 Ratings
    Reimbursement management9.5127 Ratings2.6361 Ratings
    Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings3.0227 Ratings
    Human Resource Management
    Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    2.8
    674 Ratings
    Employee demographic data00 Ratings2.4472 Ratings
    Employment history00 Ratings2.3508 Ratings
    Job profiles and administration00 Ratings3.6478 Ratings
    Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings4.0565 Ratings
    Organizational charting00 Ratings1.7391 Ratings
    Organization and location management00 Ratings1.7415 Ratings
    Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings3.7529 Ratings
    Leave and Attendance Management
    Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    1.8
    470 Ratings
    Approval workflow00 Ratings2.4387 Ratings
    Balance details00 Ratings1.6449 Ratings
    Annual carry-forward and encashment00 Ratings1.5365 Ratings
    Employee Self Service
    Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    2.6
    714 Ratings
    View and generate pay and benefit information00 Ratings3.8692 Ratings
    Update personal information00 Ratings3.8706 Ratings
    View company policy documentation00 Ratings2.4601 Ratings
    Employee recognition00 Ratings1.2211 Ratings
    View job history00 Ratings1.6527 Ratings
    Asset Management
    Comparison of Asset Management features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    1.0
    1 Ratings
    Tracking of all physical assets00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
    HR Reporting
    Comparison of HR Reporting features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    3.0
    599 Ratings
    Report builder00 Ratings3.7512 Ratings
    Pre-built reports00 Ratings3.7566 Ratings
    Ability to combine HR data with external data00 Ratings1.5284 Ratings
    Onboarding
    Comparison of Onboarding features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    3.2
    588 Ratings
    New hire portal00 Ratings3.6587 Ratings
    Manager tracking tools00 Ratings2.7363 Ratings
    Performance and Goals
    Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    1.5
    98 Ratings
    Corporate goal setting00 Ratings1.285 Ratings
    Individual goal setting00 Ratings1.295 Ratings
    Line-of sight-visibility00 Ratings1.284 Ratings
    Performance tracking00 Ratings2.494 Ratings
    Performance Management
    Comparison of Performance Management features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    2.9
    174 Ratings
    Performance plans00 Ratings2.5151 Ratings
    Performance improvement plans00 Ratings2.4142 Ratings
    Review status tracking00 Ratings1.3138 Ratings
    Review reminders00 Ratings1.3147 Ratings
    Multiple review frequency00 Ratings7.23 Ratings
    Succession Planning
    Comparison of Succession Planning features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    3.9
    74 Ratings
    Candidate ranking00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
    Candidate search00 Ratings2.469 Ratings
    Candidate development00 Ratings1.264 Ratings
    Recruiting / ATS
    Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Gusto and TriNet
    Feature
    Gusto
    -
    Ratings
    TriNet
    3.5
    111 Ratings
    Job Requisition Management00 Ratings1.283 Ratings
    Company Website Posting00 Ratings5.51 Ratings
    Publish to Social Media00 Ratings1.267 Ratings
    Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings2.484 Ratings
    Duplicate Candidate Prevention00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
    Applicant Tracking00 Ratings2.490 Ratings
    Notifications and Alerts00 Ratings2.497 Ratings
    User Ratings
    GustoTriNet
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (538 ratings)
    2.4
    (748 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (12 ratings)
    4.0
    (52 ratings)
    Usability
    9.5
    (362 ratings)
    3.0
    (643 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.6
    (19 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.8
    (19 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.3
    (25 ratings)
    2.7
    (729 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (6 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (8 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    7.5
    (28 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (11 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.2
    (3 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.8
    (7 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (18 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (15 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (15 ratings)