IBM Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere is a robotic process automation solution combining business process management tools from IBM with Automation Anywhere's bots and automation capabilities.
$840
per month
Nintex
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Nintex offers a platform that helps companies discover, automate, and optimize business processes.
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Pricing
IBM Robotic Process Automation
Nintex
Editions & Modules
IBM RPA On premises
Platform starter pack, starting at USD 840.00 per month
per month
IBM RPA Software as a service (SaaS)
Platform starter pack, starting at USD 840.00 per month
per month
Enterprise - Process Platform
$480
Minimum 1,000 users per user
Professional - Process Platform
150,000
per year
Expert - Process Platform
185,000
per year
Custom
Personalized Quote
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM Robotic Process Automation
Nintex
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM Robotic Process Automation
Nintex
Considered Both Products
IBM Robotic Process Automation
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose IBM Robotic Process Automation
Microsoft Power Automate, Slack and Microsoft Teams
1.RPA Functionality: Both IBM RPA and Accenture RPA offer core RPA functionalities, such as the ability to automate rule-based, repetitive tasks, data entry, and data extraction from various applications and systems. 2.User-Friendly Design: Both platforms typically provide …
Looking forward to the long run the IBM provides the better cost effective licensing cost as compared to other tools. The cost is a bit high but the usage flexibility copes with that. The bots can sometime gets inaccurate and could get costly, IBM AI and cognitive interaction …
The IBM Robotic Process Automation we believed stacked up comparably among other credible robotic process automation technologies that are available in the marketplace. The technology with IBM backed technologies is relatively reliable and has credibility. Our organization did …
Considering alternatives to IBM Robotic Process Automation? See what Robotic Process Automation IBM Robotic Process Automation users also considered in their purchasing decision. When evaluating different solutions, potential buyers compare competencies in categories such as …
Main difference was speed as well as accuracy of data matching. UIPATH was pathetic and not stable. Lot of features were not there. Automation Anywhere was good but we want to go with the best solution available in the market. Based on key parameters, we selected IBM …
I can tell that I did use UiPath Automation Platform and IBM Robotic Process Automation together and I can safely say that IBM Robotic Process Automation is far more compatible with enterprise environment because it's far more secure and reliable however being a new tool in the …
The decision generally and most obviously falls behind the PO deparment however I did use IBM Watson before that's why I have likened the IBM products and also when we alongside with the procurement department compare it to UiPath, IBM sounded more enterprise friendly and the …
UiPath was very popular with conferences and they were a big player in the market however, when it comes procurement I guess the decision lies with the multiple departments and we felt that UiPath was not ready to be scaled in a corporate format so that we chose IBM RPA …
Their platform allows us to establish connections with various database types, including AS400 through a separate package. Unlike UiPath, the development of the user interface is not based on selectors or drivers.One of the most valuable features of IBM RPA is its ability to …
No other products have been previously reviewed. We liked what we saw in relation to this product and decided to choose it as our solution and it has worked very well.We really like the solidity that IBM has as a group and when evaluating this tool we knew that it would work …
I like is that the systems will be exclusive to the requirements that the professionals have, this type of system greatly reduces the costs of processing information at the same time that it performs the tasks without inconveniences of failures or delays, understands the …
The software is pricey. Small-business implementation proved challenging. The program was far more challenging to implement with our software than with IBM Robotic Process Automation; therefore, I don't think it's worth the money. As a result, production was not greatly …
I've always had excellent service and had no trouble communicating. It has aided in my understanding of how I can continue to use the bots. Reading peer assessments reveals that while IBM RPA demands a substantial initial financial commitment, it justifies its cost, unlike Blue …
IFTTT, Alloy Automation, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Ignition by Inductive Automation, Zoho Marketing Automation and Zeuz Automation Testing Tools
Engaging RPA bot to enhance internal and external communications like team collaborations, address client queries, chatbot base requests is a fascinating experience We wanted to opt for a well placed Automation solution which converses in multiple major languages across the …
IBM Robotic Process Automation is much more advanced in this domain with a lot of flexibility in creating and execution of bots. Also, the management process is pretty straightforward. It gives a clear idea to the leadership team on the ongoing events thanks to understandable …
I value IBM RPA since it is a full-stage, incredibly adaptable, and simple to use. It seems to accomplish everything. It is amazing that the automated tasks proceed as planned and that the bots are faultless and error-free. IBM RPA is the greatest tool for managing rehashed …
We selected Nintex because Process Manager is a purpose designed platform for knowledge management. However, what we discovered is that there are significant limitations, which has lead us to now explore developing a knowledge management platoform in sharepoint. this is a much …
Microsoft environment does not have the scalability of Nintex; it is perfect for small and medium-sized companies, especially in environments where Microsoft environment is almost entirely used. Although Microsoft offers options to connect to other applications, its platform …
Nintex Process Platform is a great tool for automatic tasks and creating forms in SharePoint Online. For automating using other applications, including third party, Power Automate has more usage.
Xmind was great for mind mapping, but when I tried to use it as a process mapper, I found it was rather lacking. It has its uses, but process mapping (at least for us in our stage and phase of mapping) was not up to the task, unfortunately. We didn't have any other software we …
We use Outsystems for other processes in our operation but we see that this platform is not able to indentify processes when drawed. Besides that OutSystems requires some basic development knowledge to use it. This makes it not really useable for business units.
Nintex workflows has much complex process management tools and better integration tools than Microsoft Power Platform. Being able to host it on premises is also an important feature for companies that are not cloud fans.
Nintex was selected because it was somewhat unique in its capabilities and depth/breadth of ability 7+ years ago. However, the competition has now caught up and pricing is a significant factor in whether we continue to use Nintex going forward.
Nintex Process Platform was and still is by far the most flexible and easy-to-use than any of the other form creation and workflow designer apps we looked at.
It's much more reasonably priced and we were able to actually experience the platform for a bit before we made a decision. And by the time our demo was finished we had already started depending on it for some of our processes so it would've been very hard to separate from it.
We use Microsoft Power Automate as well in our organization but used Nintex Automation Cloud workflows for most of the automation workflows because NWC is low code solution to develop automation workflows for SharePoint, integrate well with Microsoft teams, better designer tool …
We are using Nintex for SharePoint 2016 forms and workflows only for all kinds of automation. It has the following benefits over others. It is faster than working with the old SharePoint Designer and its
textual design or Visual Studio with coding. Less complex workflow can
This tool is capable of filling out forms for various records and work applications, and offers advanced functionalities that can be quickly comprehended. Although it requires expertise to manage, it is user-friendly and not overly complex to operate. Our cost savings have been achieved by minimizing manual labor and optimizing our resources. I appreciate IBM's support in automating various use-cases, enabling us to implement solutions for our clients regardless of their industry or department.
The Nintex K2 platform is not only efficient and developer-friendly, but the support provided by the vendor is also highly commendable. The platform's ease of use and robust functionality make it a preferred choice for developers, while the vendor's exceptional support ensures smooth implementation and ongoing assistance, enhancing overall user satisfaction.
It's complex and pricey, thus it's not practical for use in most small enterprises.
It takes some time to get accustomed to and it is challenging to absorb everything and understand each function when not all of it is addressed in the manual.
We recommend making improvements to the Chatbot integration and making it easier to build.
Difficult to fix flows that are in process (such as re-assigning a task for someone that is OOO or has left the company).
Nintex support team does not have resolution SLAs (only acknowledgment SLAs). Occasionally this has led to key issues taking weeks to resolve.
The number of integrations available is impressive, however, sometimes key methods are not available within an integration. This has been improving significantly in the past 2 years as the platform has matured.
Renewal is mainly on the fact that Nintex is so widely used and it would be impossible to migrate all of these existing workflows to another engine. Third-party lock-in within SharePoint is pretty strong, which makes it difficult to move to something else. Our Nintex database is well-over 100 GBs. Nintex email support is very good, and I've been impressed. The Community however is non-existent and filled with unanswered questions.
IBM RPA is a very powerful tool, it has almost all the features that are necessary to build, implement and manage highly functional robots. The learning curve is very fast, so excellent skills are acquired. It is not necessary to have strong programming knowledge because its use is very easy. It is just drag and drop commands. By adding rules and logic, wonderful robots can be achieved.
Nintex Workflow does exactly what it is advertised to do: make workflow development fast and easy. It doesn't provide very much new functionality, but it isn't really supposed to. When I am working with a client on a SharePoint project, I am always happy if I hear that they use Nintex Workflow, as it makes workflows much easier.
The Nintex Process Platform has never crashed or had any availability issues during my usage. However there was an issue that was of my own making that caused a slowdown of the system. I had set up a process to run once a day and check for employees on a list that had certain parameters selected, and for some reason that I had to troubleshoot, the process instead ran constantly, which filled the cache quickly. I ended up having to dismantle that process so the system didn't crash.
Unlike any other process automation product out there. Not only is it a low-code, easy to use tool for building processes in environments like SharePoint or Salesforce, they have really started to expand their tool-set by offering tools to manage other things like process mapping, RPA, mobile,etc.
IBM has done a great job with enablement for the product. There is documentation for use-cases, development videos for beginners, and a community forum that has proven useful for getting started with the application. Although the resources cannot solve every problem a developer comes across, they have been very beneficial to our technical team.
The support team works as fast as they can and they are usually fast to solver the issues. Sometimes they need more time to solve one of them because our workflows and so on are more complex than usual clients.
I used the Nintex training software, it was easy to watch and follow along. It didn't go too fast and was descriptive enough to understand what the steps needed were in order to produce efficient workflows and user friendly forms.
I am main developer of the this implementation. I have faced many chanllenges in implementation as IBM RPA not provided direct commands to automate Excel. I enjoyed in finding solution and best approach for the implementation
1.Start with Simple Workflows: Begin with basic workflows to gain user confidence before tackling complex processes. 2.Involve Stakeholders Early: Engage business users and IT early to align workflows with real business needs. 3.Comprehensive Training: Invest in user training to ensure smooth adoption and reduce resistance. 4.Leverage Prebuilt Templates: Use Nintex’s templates to speed up implementation and maintain consistency. 5.Iterate and Optimize: Continuously improve workflows based on user feedback and performance metrics.
1.RPA Functionality: Both IBM RPA and Accenture RPA offer core RPA functionalities, such as the ability to automate rule-based, repetitive tasks, data entry, and data extraction from various applications and systems. 2.User-Friendly Design: Both platforms typically provide user-friendly interfaces and low-code or no-code development environments, allowing business users to create and manage automation processes without extensive coding knowledge. 3. Scalability: IBM RPA and Accenture RPA are designed to scale across an organization to address automation needs in various departments and processes.
I was not part of selecting Nintex, but I think Nintex does a better job of generating linear flowcharts vs. Microsoft Visio because it automates the majority of the process of creating process maps. (Microsoft Visio is better for creating flowcharts that are not linear. because it is less automated and more flexible.)
The scalability is really bottlenecked by the imagination of the user. I was able to make processes for my own personal usage, making my daily tasks easier. I was also able to make processes that affected hundreds of employees, making large standardization and efficiency gains. So either way, the system is used the same way, and I was the limiting factor.
IBM RPA can improve the accuracy and consistency of certain tasks, which can result in improved quality and reduced errors.
In our organization have IBM RPA has reduced the time required to complete certain tasks by up to 62%, which resulted in significant time and cost savings.
One of the impacts to our business was automating repetitive and manual tasks
People have woken up to the amount of overlap after mapping their processes.
People can be resistant to process changes. You need to have the support from above or support from the 'business' that you are process changing to be able to see the positive impacts.
Numbers talk. if you can get a general salary figure from your HR dept to show savings for 'employee bands', then when you present reports, they will be all the richer in data.