IBM Targetprocess vs. Jira Align

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Targetprocess
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM Targetprocess is a platform for enterprise agile planning (EAP) and strategic portfolio management (SPM) solutions that allows business and technology planners at all levels to dynamically plan and manage work, resources, investments, programs, and portfolios while ensuring continuous alignment to the enterprise strategy in a single source of truth.N/A
Jira Align
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
A solution to bridge the gap between strategy and execution for portfolio, product, and program management teams, used to manage idea intake, prioritize your feature backlog, and track progress with live roadmaps.
$27,000
per year
Pricing
IBM TargetprocessJira Align
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starting Price
$27,000.00
per year
Maximum Price
$3,987,600.00
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM TargetprocessJira Align
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM TargetprocessJira Align
Considered Both Products
IBM Targetprocess
Chose IBM Targetprocess
IBM Targetprocess is more customizable and can adapt to the organization's needs than Jira Algin
Chose IBM Targetprocess
On par with these tools but with room for improvement
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Lower cost
Easier implementation
Less restrictive in terms of customisation
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess outshone the competition on several benchmarks. The most important for our team was ease of administration, ease of configuration, cost of licenses, and ability to leverage the tool in multiple areas (not just project management or engineering). Apptio …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
During our RFP and demo rating Apptio Targetprocess came out with the highest score by 3% and was the more cost effective of the closer rival. It rated the highest in 4 out of the 8 categories we graded and had one of the most cost effective implementation costs and ranked the …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Apptio Targetprocess has more features and is more flexible for our users and its easier to develop automation rules and metrics than Atlassian Jira Alige or Planview AgilePlan.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
It’s better because of its flexibility and ability to support agile at scale as well as portfolio management in one tool.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
I wasn't a decisionmaker on the adoption of Apptio Targetprocess over the competitors so I can't clearly speak to this question.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Others weren't compared
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Targetprocess is fairy easy to use and very customizable tool compared to JIRA/JIRA Align.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
I was not part of the selection process.
Chose IBM Targetprocess
Targetprocess was all around the better tool. They do not nickel-and-dime you and you don't have to deal with multiple products that do, or do not, integrate well together. Below are some of Targetprocess' biggest strengths:
  • Highly customizable; can fit the needs of almost any …
Chose IBM Targetprocess
More flexible and powerful with custom views for any work in the system.
Jira Align
Chose Jira Align
Jira Align is the more superior tool as compared to others. With the kind of integrations Jira has made with Slack and email, it is straightforward to use and keep track of the things happening within the team.
Chose Jira Align
Jira Align has better integration with Confluence for documentation and Jira.

The workflow can be customized for support SAFe and various agile frameworks
Chose Jira Align
I think there is nothing like this out there. The point is nobody can have a second thought about it and it will be the first choice of anybody for the quantum of things it has to offer and as a whole what it brings to the table. Acts as a solid database of things done in the …
Chose Jira Align
Microsoft Azure Devops won't have the major functionality of software management like Jira. The customization provided by Jira is having a cutting edge over any project management tool. Adds-on and Plugins feature in the Jira Tool make it as perfect as desired task management …
Chose Jira Align
I would prefer to use Jira over ServiceNow or Rally. Not only am I most comfortable with Jira, but I think most teams are due to its historical use. Jira's workflow capabilities, although complex, really allow for a lot of customization that is sometimes needed for extremely …
Chose Jira Align
Atlassian Jira Align (formerly AgileCraft) is formatted in a way that's conducive to software development and Agile methodology. These other programs have their own, different uses in tracking, and are typically clunkier than Atlassian Jira Align (formerly AgileCraft).
Chose Jira Align
Jira provides a large advantage over some competitors, such as Harvest which is more of simple time tracking software, but without the connectivity provided between team members. Furthermore, Asana is a close competitor, but does not provide the same level of integration with …
Chose Jira Align
Atlassian Jira Align (formerly AgileCraft) has an excellent suite of tools that integrate well with other tools and offers full support for various agile frameworks, including SAFe. It's just a complete integrated package, whereas some other tools seem to be lacking in …
Chose Jira Align
Atlassian Jira is packed with features, though it costs more to have Jira compared to its competitors still it performs well for a large organization which depends a lot on digital channels for retail. For us, during product evaluation, Jira was the first choice compared to …
Chose Jira Align
This is a great alternative for many companies. It is especially helpful and beneficial if you have non-technical workers that need to interact with the software platform. This is a much simpler platform to have those employees use given their lower technical knowledge. In the …
Chose Jira Align
We actually had Smartsheet evaluated after we began use of Jira and determined that even though Jira serves a better purpose for our tech teams, all other teams found it much better to use Smartsheet as it continues with the project and Excel type feel that most are used to. …
Chose Jira Align
Jira is very easy to use and is very flexible. You can use Jira to easily fit your company's needs. It is perfect for Agile methodology and allows for easy communication between teams. Basecamp is more rigid and does not have as much road mapping or ticketing capabilities as …
Features
IBM TargetprocessJira Align
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Targetprocess
7.2
Ratings
5% below category average
Jira Align
-
Ratings
Task Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts4.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology6.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access5.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Search5.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools7.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
IBM Targetprocess
8.5
Ratings
3% above category average
Jira Align
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Collaboration8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Velocity Calculation8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM TargetprocessJira Align
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.7 out of 10
Craft.io
Craft.io
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.9 out of 10
ProductPlan
ProductPlan
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AgilePlace
Planview AgilePlace
Score 9.9 out of 10
Roadmunk
Roadmunk
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM TargetprocessJira Align
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(0 ratings)
9.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM TargetprocessJira Align
Likelihood to Recommend
Apptio Targetprocess is well suited to track work and progress of that work. In addition it is easy to tie that work to OKRs. Cost and hours rollup across the work hierarchy works well. Our users like the flexibility of Targetprocess and the ability to develop their own views and reports Scenarios where it is less appropriate is to do executive level reporting and develop reports that can pull in all of our time data since there is a 300k record limit
Read full review
This product is useful for a team/company working with multiple customers. Employee count anywhere larger than fifty or sixty will be benefited [from] this. Considering this product is expensive(as I’ve heard) this will not serve [many] purposes to smaller companies and startups who are having a very less customer base and [fewer...] employees.
Read full review
Pros
  • Basic flexibility out of the box is a big advantage for a small company without resources to customize, as is needed for some of the larger competitors.
  • The support is second to none. They've even written custom TP queries to get me what I want.
  • They have managed to cover all the basics of product development in one product, in particular, the inclusion of customer support (although limited) is a big selling point for a small company.
Read full review
  • Jira is a great project management tool when it comes to tracking the progress of deliverables and milestones. Each member of the team can track individual deliverables and milestones. Jira comes with filters and search functions to perform these tasks.
  • Jira is highly flexible when it comes to maintaining tasks and deliverable backlogs. You can plan and organize your sprints in such a way that you include your previous backlogs in them.
Read full review
Cons
  • The UI is bit complex for new users who never used it. i think this can be sorted out by providing the steps to access?
  • dashboards with large datasets can cause performance lags or timeouts
  • Introduce more flexible, template-based RBAC configurations.
Read full review
  • The initial ticket creation screen lacks some important features, such as assigning "point values" (a measure of effort needed for the ticket).
  • The browser needs to be manually refreshed to see new tickets, which can make things confusing when several people in a meeting are simultaneously creating tickets.
  • The interface on some smaller portions of the software are sometimes difficult to understand.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Targetprocess is the most flexible application for tracking work among teams that we have found. This power comes from near limitless ability to customize your views on the work tracked in the system, and from the myriad reporting options to draw metrics and stats out of the data there. Custom fields, processes, and mashups all add to this flexibility and appeal.
Read full review
There is nothing that can be better than Jira but it needs to keep improving certain areas especially the attachment size area.
Read full review
Usability
The UI is intuitive and consistent. The complexity of the app means there is a steep learning curve though, but it is well worth putting in the effort to get the most out of the tool. We have some team members who are learning new ways of doing things after 1-2 years of working in Targetprocess.
Read full review
Most of the things are easily manageable except certain things that are hidden and you need to ask teammates who are aware of how they can link attachements in the comment section and so on.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Some minor outages are experienced, though these tend to pass within an hour usually and work can continue
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
Reports are fast loading, considering they can refresh in a second or less and we have 7 years of work tracked in over 40k entities. Pages can load slowly when the views are very busy, but not frustratingly. I am a console user most of my career and generally prefer it over webUI interfaces, but Targetprocess won me over from the beginning and I spend half my day using it now.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
TargetProcess' support is one of its strengths. The support team is very responsive and helpful when there is a problem but they're also proactive in providing good release notes and engaging with the community through a voting scheme to influence the priority of new features.
The team also releases new versions frequently with new features but with no knock-ons to currently working features.
Read full review
It is average. It needs to improve overall if you are paying the amount of money it costs. For now, it does the job, but with so many new features being added it would be very helpful to kick this up a notch.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
You should take some time to get everyone to agree how the system should be setup before work starts being tracked in Targetprocess, this avoids difficult and disruptive changes to processes or plugins later when everyone relies on it daily.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Targetprocess was all around the better tool. They do not nickel-and-dime you and you don't have to deal with multiple products that do, or do not, integrate well together. Below are some of Targetprocess' biggest strengths:
  • Highly customizable; can fit the needs of almost any team
  • Robust reporting tool
  • Easy to use and administer
  • Provides all the functionality an agile org would be looking for
  • Support team and user guide are phenomenal.
Read full review
Atlassian JIRA Align (formerly AgileCraft) has an excellent suite of tools that integrate well with other tools and offers full support for various agile frameworks, including SAFe. It's just a complete integrated package, whereas some other tools seem to be lacking in different areas. Several plug-ins can be integrated to help with pro serv invoicing and integration with GitHub, Jenkins, Confluence, and other tools that we use.
Read full review
Scalability
We use the hosted version of Targetprocess and have never run into limitations or degraded performance due to scalability. Excellent performance over 7 years!
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • TargetProcess is my all-time favorite project management software that enables me to work collaboratively and also enthusiastically with my colleagues.
  • Before its invention, emails were difficult to handle in the past but now to make connections better I only trust this application because it’s a good intuitive to work in the form of group.
  • It provides me a quite useful view that facilitates my working in a way that I can create a customized view of all my ongoing projects.
Read full review
  • Able to forecast & plan releases well using agilecraft leading to quality on time delivery.
  • Distributed teams are able to collaborate well, be it be daily scrum, retrospective, estimation though this. Also team members love the gamification part & they have fun using this tool. Earlier we use to face challenges due to distributed teams but after AgileCraft, collaboration & communication was no longer a challenge & we are able to see improvement not only in team velocity, but also team satisfaction.
  • Simplest tool to implement safe, scaling is always a problem with most of the agile tools but agilecraft helps in smoother implementation of safe practices & principles.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Targetprocess Screenshots

Screenshot of Resource Management: Reduces risk by dynamically managing resources, capacity, and demandScreenshot of Program Management: To deliver value throughout a strategic portfolioScreenshot of Portfolio Budgeting: Shifting from project to product fundingScreenshot of Strategic Planning: Continuously links work, labor, and investments to business strategy