TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    iCIMS

    Score6.4 out of 10
    N/AiCIMS is a web-based applicant tracking system (ATS). The tool's talent recruiting and management functions include features like social recruiting, talent sourcing, offer management, and onboarding. The programs are centralized on iCIMS’s UNIFi platform and are scaled for mid-sized to enterprise businesses.

    $1,700

    per month

    Jobvite

    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Jobvite is a full recruiting platform. It provides features across the recruiting funnel - from sourcing and managing candidates via CRM and managing workflows to communicating with hiring managers and reporting through custom dashboards and reports.N/A
    Pricing
    iCIMSJobvite
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    iCIMSJobvite
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    iCIMSJobvite
    Considered Both Products
    iCIMS
    Chose iCIMS
    Jobvite was our last ATS that has better marketing/CRM solutions, however, we experienced negative customer service and decided to switch to iCIMS for a similar price point. We are in the process of moving to Workday Recruit as our new ATS which doesn't offer as much …
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    At the time Jobvite was not user friendly or easy to customize, which is what led me to look for alternatives. They have since changed their platform to be more competitive, but I have no interest in changing at this time.
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    We recently went through an RFP process and iCIMS was a finalist with Avature and Jobvite. iCIMS finished third in that RFP because of their high cost, challenging customer service, difficult reporting and their ability to work with us on customization of our site.
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    Lever is more user friendly, more visual, and less reporting issues. iCIMS Talent Cloud is more configurable and able to grow more candidates in a faster fashion. Lever has better support than iCIMS, which is an overall win for anyone using it. Lever is also growing their …
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    Better technology. Reasonably priced. Great customer service. Continually updates to keep current. Strong partnerships with other vendors. Great add-on services.
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    iCIMS Talent Acquisition allowed us the necessary reporting, searching, and hosting we were looking for and once this implementation was completed, the usability of the programs are very easy. The additional ability to expand into various Onboarding and coordinating tasks for …
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    iCIMS was the best bang for our buck!
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    The reporting options seemed more robust for iCIMS.
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    iCIMS seems more adaptable, scale-able, for a competitive cost.
    Proven platform, with good clientele, good ratings.
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    Bullhorn is most similar I saw to iCIMS - It's ideal for large staffing organizations with 100s of reqs.

    Jobvite - My organization ultimately selected this as our current ATS. We are a smaller, growing company with an entrepreneurial mindset and Jobvite fits perfectly with our …
    Incentivized
    Chose iCIMS
    I was not involved in the RFP process for iCims.
    Chose iCIMS
    We looked at the solutions above before deciding on iCIMS. We found iCIMS had the functionality to support our automated requisition and offer approval process, local language support for resumes/messages, ease of use, and right price point. A high level of customer service was …
    Employ, Inc.
    Chose Jobvite
    Honestly - I was set to go with iCIMS but the customer service was awful. Jobvite’s customer service is fantastic!
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    Before implementing Jobvite, we had iCIMS and Kronos Workforce Ready. Neither of these products got us where we wanted to be with metrics, candidate experience, or technology. I'm sure since we left them they have updated, but we are much happier with Jobvite than others. In …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    Jobvite is more user-friendly from a Talent Acquisition and candidate perspective. You are able to use with very little IT intervention. iCIMS has some capabilities, such as job library, hiring manager survey, external & internal job titles that I wish Jobvite had.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    iCIMS was going to be our first choice, but was more expensive for what we needed. I would rate Jobvite very similar to iCIMS.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    Jobvite easily beats all 3 of these. UlltiPro although branded as an ATS is not an ATS, it is a data repository and lacks everything I as a long time recruiter and talent acquisition manager would need to effectively do my job. iCIMS wasn't bad, but was more difficult to learn …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    We picked Jobvite primarily because the cost to features ratio was the right one for us based on our business requirements. We also selected them because of ease of use, strong customer support, and the ability to support multiple market-facing brands. CATS is good but very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    While I had not used it, we heavily considered iCIMS as a possible solution. It's also a best of breed product, with many of the same types of advancements as Jobvite, but it lacked in connection to social networks and does not have a dedicated CRM that connects to it. Jobvite …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    I used iCIMS in the past, and considered them when I selected Jobvite for this organization. I found at the time that the customizability and social recruiting tools were just better with Jobvite, and ended up feeling that they were the better solution for our needs.
    Chose Jobvite
    Jobvite will in my opinion easily rise to the top. We had actually selected another system to go with and learned during the implementation phase that it could not do what we needed and wanted it to. In the end, we had to abandon the project and go back to an RFP. When that …
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    Greenhouse was a close competitor, but at the time (7-8 years ago) we felt Jobvite was ahead of the curve, constantly adapting, and had real recruiters working on their applications and workflows. They understood the landscape.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    We selected Jobvite because of what we believe to be better technical capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    We evaluated iCIMS, Taleo, and CATS. Jobvite was hands down the best. All others had pretty poor UX for recruiters and candidates. They felt clunky or slim in terms of features. Jobvite was the best option in terms of slick, simple UI, and complete features.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    Jobvite has more features than SmartRecruiters, iCIMS, and Taleo. Greenhouse looks like they will blow Jobvite out of the water.
    Incentivized
    Chose Jobvite
    The RFP had been started prior to my joining the company and the final decision was down to Jobvite and Newton. Jobvite seemed like it would have the ability to scale further and meet more of our business-oriented (vs just recruiting) needs.

    If Taleo had been in the running …
    Chose Jobvite
    Products used before are Candidate Manager.
    Evaluated iCIMS, Oracle, Cornerstone,
    Chose Jobvite
    Jobvite is by far my favorite ATS that I have used. I will say that Taleo Enterprise Edition was an excellent tool, perfect in many ways, but I used that when I worked at Booz Allen, and it was highly customized, there were full time administrators on site, and it had really …
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    iCIMSJobvite
    Recruiting / ATS
    Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of iCIMS Talent Cloud and Jobvite
    Feature
    iCIMS Talent Cloud
    8.4
    126 Ratings
    Jobvite
    8.6
    63 Ratings
    Job Requisition Management8.8123 Ratings8.660 Ratings
    Company Website Posting9.6117 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Publish to Social Media7.5103 Ratings9.762 Ratings
    Job Search Site Posting9.4108 Ratings9.760 Ratings
    Customized Application Form7.2111 Ratings9.060 Ratings
    Resume Management9.2120 Ratings8.561 Ratings
    Duplicate Candidate Prevention5.2114 Ratings5.957 Ratings
    Candidate Search9.4121 Ratings7.962 Ratings
    Applicant Tracking9.6122 Ratings9.562 Ratings
    Collaboration9.7110 Ratings8.057 Ratings
    Task Creation and Delegation7.193 Ratings6.549 Ratings
    Email Templates8.8122 Ratings9.660 Ratings
    User Permissions9.3120 Ratings9.961 Ratings
    Notifications and Alerts7.5108 Ratings9.960 Ratings
    Reporting7.3121 Ratings7.658 Ratings
    User Ratings
    iCIMSJobvite
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (147 ratings)
    7.7
    (90 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.8
    (31 ratings)
    8.9
    (22 ratings)
    Usability
    8.8
    (68 ratings)
    8.7
    (10 ratings)
    Availability
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    8.2
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (103 ratings)
    6.8
    (49 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.9
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    6.3
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Configurability
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)