MaestroConference vs. Webex App

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MaestroConference
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
MaestroConference is a web conferencing platform with the capability to run small break-out sessions within the main group. It incorporates voting and social capabilities.N/A
Webex App
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
The Webex App brings together Webex Calling, Meetings, and Messaging into a single application, fostering collaboration and unlocking more productive ways to work.
$0
user/month
Pricing
MaestroConferenceWebex App
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic Plan
$0.00
user/month
Meet Plan
$13.50
user/month
Meet + Call Plan
$25.00
user/month
Enterprise Plan
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MaestroConferenceWebex App
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MaestroConferenceWebex App
Considered Both Products
MaestroConference
Chose MaestroConference
Maestro Conference is the only service I know that allows you to create break out groups and allow participants to actively engage with each other and with the host. It is the most like an "in-person" event of any service I have used. And the customer service has always been …
Chose MaestroConference
Maestro Conference has breakout rooms. That is its point of difference. If you need breakout rooms, this is it. If you don't, this solution is not the best in any other regard.
Chose MaestroConference
Maestro has everything that GoToMeeting and WebEx has. The primary thing that sold us on Maestroconference was the ability to incorporate breakout groups for small group discussions and explorations. It also is very easy to access and does not require a type of download onto a …
Webex App
Chose Webex App
Webex stands out for its comprehensive features and enterprise level security that cater well to hybrid work environments. Webex app is a unified communication tool unlike other platforms.
Chose Webex App
Cisco Nexus Dashboard and Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller
Chose Webex App
Webex App is far superior to Calendar Hero, Microsoft Teams, and Hub for Teams in many ways but most importantly it was more cost effective for our small business. It was also more user friendly and worked on many platforms, besides just the app, desktop, etc as well. We …
Chose Webex App
Microsoft Teams is the main competitor of the Webex App. But it provides services for less cost than Webex App. And also teams are used by majority of companies in software industries due to its support for other Microsoft services.
Chose Webex App
Webex App is better than other tools because it can be easily used both by employee and internal partners and external ones.
Other tools ask for credential passcode or tailor made permission, Webex App doesn’t work in this sense and this is a plus.
Also Webex App reminds you …
Chose Webex App
Zoom Phone, Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro and Google Meet
Chose Webex App
UI is too good along with no sound glitch all the time compared to previous platform.
Chose Webex App
In my opinion, Webex App is better than Teams and GChat in searching and filtering, but equal to Slack.

In my opinion, Webex App is extremely worst at screenshooting than all the other tools, as well as worst in threading than all those tools.
Chose Webex App
Webex App stands out in this crowded space of similar products due to it's high audio and video quality during meetings. It's transcript generation, video recording and other AI features makes it a great product for team collboration and communication. However, it's cost and …
Chose Webex App
Slido is the best tool for conference feedback, online, live, and hybrid. I don't use it with Webex, though, as chat and questions are usually enough. As a moderator, I also do not decide od extra tools, probably Slido costs extra. (Our company pays for Slido but not for Webex, …
Chose Webex App
It has far more features available, at a lower price, with a great multi-platform capability and guarantees an always-on utilization
Chose Webex App
Our organisation has decided to use Webex for internal communication. Unfortunately, I don't know the reasons behind this, it was decided by IT and not by the individuals in the organisation. As far as I know, however, the majority are satisfied and would recommend Webex to …
Chose Webex App
Teams natively integrates services and features of our organization because we are a Microsoft shop. For this reason alone, WebEx will never compete. Slack, however, is a trendy solution that integrates well with everything (as long as you are willing to work with 3rd party …
Chose Webex App
Vonage may be one of the oldest or original VOIP phone systems, but Webex holds it's own to them. Webex uses screen sharing and video meetings which is better for our staff to instantly touch base with each other when needed.
Chose Webex App
Zoom AI Companion, Stack Overflow for Teams and TeamViewer
Chose Webex App
Both are good but the Webex App has been really good in terms of connectivity and data retention. Google Meet is good but I find Webex App better.
Chose Webex App
This is a difficult question because many companies similarly to us have invested in the Microsoft platform and ecosystem of products so when compared to the office umbrella of products, office and teams is just there to use and does not need nor require additional use training …
Chose Webex App
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)
Chose Webex App
They all complement each other very well
Chose Webex App
Very similar, but Teams doesn’t have number calling
Chose Webex App
Webex App is known for its high-quality video and audio capabilities. Webex App performs well even with low bandwidth environment. Features like background noise suppression enhance clarity. It also provides robust security features including end to end encryption, compliance …
Features
MaestroConferenceWebex App
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
MaestroConference
-
Ratings
Webex App
7.0
Ratings
10% below category average
Task Management00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Search00 Ratings6.50 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings5.50 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
MaestroConference
-
Ratings
Webex App
7.7
Ratings
3% below category average
Chat00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Notifications00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Discussions00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Surveys00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook00 Ratings10.00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
MaestroConference
-
Ratings
Webex App
7.4
Ratings
6% below category average
Versioning00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Video files00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Audio files00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Document collaboration00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Access control00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Advanced security features00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive00 Ratings1.20 Ratings
Device sync00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MaestroConferenceWebex App
Small Businesses
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Intermedia AnyMeeting Pro
Score 7.1 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
JioMeet
JioMeet
Score 10.0 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Webex Meetings
Webex Meetings
Score 8.4 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MaestroConferenceWebex App
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.9
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MaestroConferenceWebex App
Likelihood to Recommend
Key questions to ask might be: 1) Do I want to create a more "in-person" experience for my participants? 2) Do I want participants to be able to connect in smaller groups? 3) Will I be leading exercises that I want participants to actively engage in? 4) Would it be helpful for participants to be able to talk amongst themselves at any point during my presentation? 5) Do I want to be able to listen in on what participants share in the smaller groups?
Read full review
It is best suited for invitation-only paid online events with a professional moderator and someone who takes care of the technical issues. The downside I see is that people are less familiar with Webex than other platforms. This creates a barrier. Also, It would help if transcription supported Slovenian. It is less appropriate for events and meetings in Slovenian.
Read full review
Pros
  • The number one strength of Maestro Conference is the ability for the host to create "break out" groups where members of the call can interact with each other in smaller groups as if they were in an in-person conference.
  • Another quality of Maestro Conference that I love is the fact that the host can then "weave in and out" of the different break out groups, listening in, providing support and getting feedback. It's an incredibly tool that Maestro offers.
  • Lastly I think Maestro Conference has excellent customer service.
Read full review
  • High-quality, high-impact communications in our workflow.
  • It's great for sharing large documents, it doesn't slow down our communications.
  • The dark mode is excellent, it has a good image and seamless integration features.
  • We can record meetings, which is perfect for backing up any information that may be overlooked.
Read full review
Cons
  • The call sound quality was often pretty poor, and we had a lot of trouble with calls being dropped. Over the years I would periodically throw in the towel and go back to Free Conferencing just to have reliable quality. But they only have 3 of 4 breakout rooms and I couldn't conduct the rooms easily. Then I try MC again to see if the engineering had improved. It was like a wave. Sometimes better, sometimes worse.
  • The conductor interface has an annoying glitch wherein we could not change a persons attribute fields on the fly. I would interview my callers and assign them to one class or another based on their answers, and the partner up people into breakout rooms based on their answers. This meant editing the two attribute fields , and it just plain didn't work 75% of the time.
  • Maestro Conference repositioned its business away from small educators like me, to large organizations like political action committees. The price became too high for me, and it just no longer made sense. I repositioned my product to work with less expensive and less complicated solutions.
  • The add on features, like recording each conference room, were insanely expensive.
  • VOIP and MC didn't mix. The MC dialer never worked. Neither did Skype. This meant that my international callers were out of luck. This was FRUSTRATING to say the least. Now I just use Skype. A picture is worth a thousand words.
Read full review
  • Easier group discussions, as default title is always "General" then the people listed, it can be difficult for some users to visualize who they are talking to if done quickly.
  • The ability to set my status as "available" so people know they can reach out to me, even if I haven't been at my desk for 10 minutes.
  • The ability to send a message based on someone's availability status (i.e. not in a meeting, or not presenting) rather than just time.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Too much money for what I get. I have reworked my product to use fewer breakout rooms, or to work in other ways
Read full review
We really like the flexibility of jabber. With the exception of a few quirks that we have found, we see a bright future with it. We depend on it daily and will continue to do so for several years to come. As our team grows, more users will be using it and more screen sharing will be done. It it an indispensable tool that we simply could not imagine going without. It makes communicating so much easier when time is of the essence.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Webex is quite usable, and it is, in fact very easy to use as well. You don't need a lot of documentation to learn how to use the app as it's mostly self-explanatory. The user interface is easy on the eyes, and people can see buttons without issues. Overall, WebEx's front-end design is great and I don't have much issue with it.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
I would say every time I open it, it is there, there are times that our users have to sign out and back in to get it to work or even do a full exit as the app will disconnect from the controlling the desk phone, but some easy steps to sign-out or fully exit the app gets the user back up and running quickly.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
On standalone it works fine, it used to consume a considerable amount of system resources in the past, but with updates and upgrades, this has improved quite a lot. As far as integrations with other systems, we have not come across any critical issues with the app.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The support team is quick in reverting to the issues faced, and it has multiple language support, which would be very helpful for some instances. Their expertise in resolving queries is instantaneous. Most of the common lags/issues in the application are identified and fixed with regular updates.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
I would rate the in-person training 9/10. The session was highly interactive, providing opportunities for real-time questions and hands-on experience, which made the learning process more engaging. The trainer was knowledgeable, addressing our specific needs and ensuring that all participants fully understood the material. The structured approach and practical exercises helped reinforce key concepts. However, allocating more time for hands-on practice and group discussions could have further improved the overall experience, making it even more effective.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Very easy to create. All operations are done without any problems with our business growth. All people like the experience including me as an instructor. The tools that WebEx App offers us are very complete for working in a virtual classroom, whether it is sharing the screen, the different display modes, the whiteboard, or even the scoring tools on the screen, it allows me to do my job as an instructor as if I was face to face with the participants.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
There was quite a bit of back and forth with TAC and Cisco Reps to get it fully up and running but we did get there. Some of which had to do with documentation was not fully understandable. But with Cisco TAC we were able to get fully up and running.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Maestro has everything that GoToMeeting and WebEx has. The primary thing that sold us on Maestroconference was the ability to incorporate breakout groups for small group discussions and explorations. It also is very easy to access and does not require a type of download onto a users' computer for the interactive conference calls. The interface is very intuitive and easy to use and the call quality is high and access is reliable.
Read full review
Microsoft Teams is the main competitor of the Webex App. But it provides services for less cost than Webex App. And also teams are used by majority of companies in software industries due to its support for other Microsoft services.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
Once everything is in place on the back end getting Webex on a user's PC is now very easy and with single sign-on, users are able to sign in without having to remember another password. Just make sure you have all the user settings in CUCM, CUC set right, and that they have the needed licenses in Webex Control Hub.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • increased engagement
  • increased collaboration among departments
  • better assessment of field needs
  • increased productivity
  • reduce cost of delivering training and conducting meetings
Read full review
  • Webex App has really helped in implementing virtual work or working from home, thereby increasing the productivity by saving the traveling time to office. So, it's hard to express it in some measurable matrix, but for sure it has increased the productivity and also, the better document sharing and presentation tools, helps the meeting to be very crisp and super productive.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MaestroConference Screenshots

Screenshot of Social Webinar exampleScreenshot of A "breakout group" discussion - where you can see the faces of the other people you talk with by phone or using VOIP/your computerScreenshot of You can poll your participants with Poll View in Social WebinarScreenshot of Share links with other participants in a Social Webinar chat window, while you talkScreenshot of Crowdsource ideas with Idea Board View in Social Webinar