TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs. TeamViewer

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ManageEngine Endpoint Central

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/ADesktop Central from ManageEngine is a client desktop management with patching, remote control, and configuration.

    $795

    per year per user

    TeamViewer

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ATeamViewer provides software for both remote management and online collaborations. With TeamViewer, users have access to fully integrated online conference solutions for audio and video communication, including interactive screen sharing and remote access features.

    $299

    per year

    Pricing
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralTeamViewer
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Remote Access
    $24.90
    per month (billed annually) 1 Licensed User
    Business
    $50.90
    per month (billed annually) 1 Licensed User
    Premium
    $102.90
    per month (billed annually) 15 Licensed Users
    Corporate
    $206.90
    per month (billed annually) 30 Licensed Users
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralTeamViewer
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralTeamViewer
    Considered Both Products
    ManageEngine, A Div of Zoho Corporation Pvt Ltd
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    TeamViewer is a good solution for remote control, but I haven't found it as useful for patch management, software deployment and inventory reporting
    However, the file transfer and chat functions of TeamViewer are better to use than Endpoint central
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    We have used TeamViewer and are currently evaluating LogMeIn. Both products have been very reliable in remote sessions but lack the inventory feature that we like in Desktop Central 10.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central was easier to use and more cost effective in the long run. It also provided a great integration with Service Desk Plus under one umbrella of products.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    It is overall better, locally deployed accessed via agent
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    Deeper Windows control, especially for legacy, domain-joined machines.

    Better third-party patch management out of the box.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    The others were simple remote access solutions, ManageEngine Endpoint Central gives much more functionality and value for the money. Integrations with Service Desk providers and other apps makes it even more valuable.
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central allows for remote access that these others done. In our experience, the others are either focused ENTIRELY on remote access and nothing else or are focused on remote management but not actual access (like remote RDP). We need both and ManageEngine …
    Incentivized
    Chose ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    We have only ever used ManageEngine Endpoint Central - previously we have used WSUS - ManageEngine Endpoint Central is a far better experience overall, and allows us to utilise other features within the tool other than Patch Management - way more cost effective for what you get …
    Incentivized
    TeamViewer
    Chose TeamViewer
    Overall TeamViewer is superior to other remote solutions that I've used. It is faster and more reliable, with a better overall interface and management console. AnyDesk is generally slower and the interface is not as intuitive or easy to use. Endpoint Central is also slower …
    Incentivized
    Chose TeamViewer
    Much easier to user and it provides more at a better price.
    Therefore teamviewer (in my honest opinion) is the easy winner here.
    However one thing that Goverlan does better is the security implementations. I believe the logs from teamviewer are not secure.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralTeamViewer
    Remote Administration
    Comparison of Remote Administration features of ManageEngine Endpoint Central and TeamViewer
    Feature
    ManageEngine Endpoint Central
    -
    Ratings
    TeamViewer
    8.4
    470 Ratings
    File transfer00 Ratings8.7440 Ratings
    Instant message00 Ratings8.5406 Ratings
    Access to sleeping/powered-off computers00 Ratings7.9305 Ratings
    Session record00 Ratings8.5307 Ratings
    Annotations00 Ratings7.387 Ratings
    User Ratings
    ManageEngine Endpoint CentralTeamViewer
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (54 ratings)
    8.7
    (521 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.3
    (6 ratings)
    10.0
    (64 ratings)
    Usability
    7.9
    (14 ratings)
    9.0
    (57 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    Support Rating
    7.8
    (7 ratings)
    9.4
    (50 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (2 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    8.9
    (80 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (5 ratings)