TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Remote Desktop Services vs. Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Alludo

Connect with Alludo

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Alludo so that Alludo and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Remote Desktop Services

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/ARemote Desktop Services from Microsoft is virtual desktop and remote user session technology.N/A

    Parallels RAS

    Score6.8 out of 10
    N/AParallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS, formerly 2X RAS), is application virtualization technology, billed as a solution to extend the life of legacy OS (like Windows XP) with its virtual desktop for any device. Maltese company 2X Software developed the technology, but was acquired by Parallels (in Seattle, WA) in February, 2015 to extend their cross-platform support solutions.

    $120

    per year per user

    Pricing
    Remote Desktop ServicesParallels RAS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Remote Desktop ServicesParallels RAS
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Remote Desktop ServicesParallels RAS
    Considered Both Products
    Microsoft
    Chose Remote Desktop Services
    Mainly licensing optimization, as Remote Desktop Services CALs are needed anyway for other products.
    Incentivized
    Alludo
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Parallels Remote Application Server has been easier and less expensive to implement for our clients than VMware Horizon and offers a better experience than Microsoft Remote Desktop Services. All three of these can accomplish similar end results, but when looking at the overall …
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    faster, leaner and more comfortable at the same time cheaper than Citrix, and in relation to the benefits to native RDS good price/performance ratio
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Parallels is easy since it only allow me to connect and work from the Application needed.
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    RDS has few options when publishing apps outside of the organisation vs RAS along with a limited and (since Server 2012) completely bizarre admin GUI. RAS is very simply administrated from locally installed client along with pre-defined admin use permissions.

    There are also …
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Sassafras, Labstats were also considered. RDS can only provide 1:1 connections
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Parallels is far superior to basic RDS and is comparable to Citrix at less cost and hassle.
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Was simpler to set up and use, at a better price point.
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    First and foremost, Parallels Remote Application Server is a game changer in price performance compared to Citrix. In addition, the security and flexibility compared to a traditional Microsoft RDS solution is night and day better both in terms of security and configuration …
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Parallels Remote Application Server is easier to set up. It's easier to manage and, in my opinion, it's more secure.
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Easy to deploy with good scalability and infrastructure requirements.
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Users were formerly using unmanaged remote access programs to bypass the firewall. Previously I had used RemoteApp when the source of users was predictable (and traffic could be limited to a single site).
    Incentivized
    Chose Parallels RAS
    Set-up is many times faster especially for remote/external access. It takes hours with Parallels instead of the days it takes with other alternatives.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Remote Desktop ServicesParallels RAS
    Remote Administration
    Comparison of Remote Administration features of Remote Desktop Services and Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
    Feature
    Remote Desktop Services
    8.9
    3 Ratings
    Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)
    -
    Ratings
    Screen sharing9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    File transfer9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Secure remote access with Smart Card authentication8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access to sleeping/powered-off computers8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Over-the-Internet remote session8.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Initiate remote control from mobile10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remote management of servers & workstations9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Remote Active Directory® management9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized management dashboard9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Session record9.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring and Alerts8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Remote Desktop ServicesParallels RAS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.3
    (17 ratings)
    8.9
    (151 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.8
    (21 ratings)
    Usability
    6.6
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (28 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Performance
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    4.5
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.6
    (129 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (10 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    4.5
    (3 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.1
    (4 ratings)