Microsoft Viva Engage vs. Mitel MiCollab

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft Viva Engage
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.
$24
per year per user
Mitel MiCollab
Score 4.2 out of 10
N/A
Mitel MiCollab is a collaboration and conferencing tool for enterprises, from Canadian company Mitel.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Viva EngageMitel MiCollab
Editions & Modules
Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
$24
per year per user
Microsoft Viva Suite
$144
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Viva EngageMitel MiCollab
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsMicrosoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Viva EngageMitel MiCollab
Considered Both Products
Microsoft Viva Engage
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
My organization has both Teams & Microsoft Yammer. They use Microsoft Yammer for a larger group as a social media tool for the whole organization, more like a one-way communication from the organization towards a large group of employees. However, I think teams is more suitable …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Basically, all these applications have the same functions, to share jobs and projects in real time and have functioned very similar to social networks that are used daily such as Facebook, Instagram, and others. Yammer was chosen because it is very easy to use, fast and safe.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Atlassian Confluence
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
I like how Yammer has functions that are fun and interactive, which can give you much more to do than using Teams or even Microsoft Forms. Yammer helps people feel included and gives people a better sense of how their friends and co-workers are feeling on certain issues. Yammer …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is very rudimentary as a broadcast tool and team notification. I has been surpassed in functionality and usefulness by all the other apps listed.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is better-suited than MS Teams for quick, informal texts with my colleagues.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Skype for business might be great for small meetings but yammer is way better for communication and discussion groups.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
I would say Yammer stacks up to Jabber pretty similarly, except with yammer we have the ability to create more of a collaborate platform. We love Jabber, but we use that more for direct instant messaging, whereas Yammer brings us all together in a larger group (it’s been great …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
We now use Microsoft Teams for chatting and project communication and it is more effective than Yammer. I do not find a use for Yammer any longer.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Salesforce Chatter was the initial product we tested as we already use Salesforce throughout the organization. We thought it would be a natural fit. However, we found it was difficult to keep the many groups, thoughts and ideas separate in Chatter, with many of our topics …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer's biggest competition is definitely Workplace by Facebook. Both provide a "post, like, share" social network experience adapted to an enterprise paradigm. Both provide real-time chat on top of that to drive collaboration. Both have lightweight content management to …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Slack, similar features.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
We used Share Point currently and in the past would post things there, Yammer is a little better because people are used to seeing a feed scroll and Share Point did get ignored after a while. PostS tend to get stale there quicker since the format is not as appealing.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
There are few good alternatives to Microsoft Yammer that serve up the same functionality and allow for networking to the same extent. Prior to Yammer, we used an internal tool which was clunky and did not meet our companies needs. Yammer has proven to be much more successful …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Salesforce Chatter and Yammer can often be used in very similar ways. Both offer the ability to collaborate with team-members in real-time. Furthermore, both tools offer ability to share, comment, and network across organizations. One issue with Yammer is that it feels a bit …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Each app serves a different purpose even though there may be some overlap. Yammer is a little like Facebook and one can create, join, or find communities, and many people are familiar with Facebook. Slack works with channels and there are some people who are not as familiar …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer created very important and reliable social network across the whole company. We used to have MS SharePoint, but since Yammer became available via Office 365 we moved to Yammer.

IBM Connections is difficult to maintain + costs are higher.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer is a comprehensive program with enough tools to meet the responsibilities of the company, because it is easier to use and offers more creative and innovative work tools.

The company decided to select Yammer over other programs because Yammer is safer and more prestigious …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer seemed like a lite powered Slack that was just coming into its prime. Still a ways to go, but integration with Office365 was great.
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
IBM Connections has a more mature set of features however it is expensive and difficult to maintain. Traditionally IBM Connections require an on-premise installation which required a large capital investment and an ongoing level of expertise to maintain. Although now IBM offers …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
The login integration to MS accounts was key. The concept of having to login with one additional account is no longer an attractive option. Yammer integrates to other MS logins for a seamless user experience. FB Business is a nice alternative, but Yammer being under the MS …
Chose Microsoft Viva Engage
Yammer, although not as strong for project management, has been a great tool to help our teams collaborate and build camaraderie across the organization.
Mitel MiCollab
Chose Mitel MiCollab
Mitel MiCollab compares satisfactory to these other Collaboration solutions but as stated before for SMB customer's who have budget concerts and already have a Mitel environment for their unified communication infrastructure, this definatley will work and meet their collab …
Chose Mitel MiCollab
The micollab just overall fits better with our company and users. It's easier for people to use if they have never used it and easier to train in a mass group setting than the other series. Documentation and training videos are easily retainable from the micollab website, …
Chose Mitel MiCollab
[I believe] Mitel MiCollab's conferencing doesn't stack up in comparison with any of the bigger conferencing tools. For its internal purposes, as part of a Mitel phone system, it's great (the voicemail manager is excellent), but the minute you try and host a web conference with …
Chose Mitel MiCollab
MiCollab was great as a VOIP solution and general team collaboration solution, but it lacked in some areas, such as the mobile app, complex configuration and set up as well as the lack of user customization. Overall, the system is serviceable, but seemed rather vanilla …
Chose Mitel MiCollab
Not as good as its competitors but does the job. It needs to have more features and integrate with other applications.
Chose Mitel MiCollab
I believe that most of my colleages prefer Webex. That could just be that people like that with which they are familiar. But, I can't really say. Webex did seem to be easier to use from my perspective.
Chose Mitel MiCollab
Both products work really well. Both require a good amount of setup. MiCollab is much cheaper with an equal amount of quality.
Chose Mitel MiCollab
8x8 is a great solution, we have just been on the MiTel MiCollab and Mitel softwares for many years. Prior to joining this company I was responsible for the communications system. 8x8 at the time was the best choice, however, I would now pick MiTel and the MiCollab softwares …
Chose Mitel MiCollab
This is good for syncing with your Mitel desk phone (we use cloud-based Mitel service). It is definitely a help with that system. As for a stand-alone product, I don't see that it would be useful (like Skype). Does not have video conferencing. It does have a chat feature, but …
Chose Mitel MiCollab
Mitel is more well known within the IT world and had better ratings. That is why our IT department went with Mitel MiCollab. Plus it was compatible with all our devices and suited all our needs as an organization.
Chose Mitel MiCollab
I feel like it's hard to compare them, as the Yealink system we just implemented is a modern VOIP system, whereas the Mitel MiCollab system we had (even though we upgraded it once over the 12-years of usage) still wasn't as user-friendly for us as Yealink now is to us. In our …
Features
Microsoft Viva EngageMitel MiCollab
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
5.4
Ratings
36% below category average
Mitel MiCollab
5.6
Ratings
32% below category average
Task Management6.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Gantt Charts7.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Scheduling3.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Workflow Automation2.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Mobile Access8.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Search8.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Visual planning tools4.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
7.6
Ratings
4% below category average
Mitel MiCollab
6.7
Ratings
17% below category average
Chat8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Notifications7.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Discussions8.00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Surveys6.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting7.30 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts6.70 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook8.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Viva Engage
5.0
Ratings
45% below category average
Mitel MiCollab
6.0
Ratings
27% below category average
Versioning7.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Video files5.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Audio files4.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document collaboration1.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Access control3.00 Ratings5.00 Ratings
Advanced security features5.00 Ratings3.00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Device sync7.00 Ratings4.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Microsoft Viva EngageMitel MiCollab
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft Viva EngageMitel MiCollab
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Online Training
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft Viva EngageMitel MiCollab
Likelihood to Recommend
Yammer provides a social network experience for the enterprise, providing a "Facebook for work". Its mobile app provides an excellent user experience, showing the full mix of communications happening across topics and teams. The web app, while it hasn't evolved much in the last few years, provides a good experience consuming news. Personally, I use Yammer every morning to see what's happening across my company and comment, like, and share to interact across silos. As long as the size of the network inside of Yammer is managed - likely partitioning a large organization into business units, etc., - then Yammer provides an excellent platform for social news and "bottom up" collaboration across teams. Its free-form posting style, including articles and polls for interactive content, helps break down silos across the organization. Contrasted with the boring world of email, Yammer is a tantalizing world of pictures, GIFs, and videos. At LiveTiles, we share company and team news via Yammer, enabling others to see the progress and milestones - from a new office to a new customer - without the heavy burden of a company newsletter or similarly curated content. Even though we have fully adopted Teams for day-to-day, intra-team communication, Yammer is still the gold standard for inter-team communication.
Read full review
MiCollab is great for a large office to get users working from home and being able to use their home phone or cell phone like the desk phone at the office. This allows our live operators the ability to see if the end-user is on an active call before sending a new call to them. If you have a very small company of fewer than 10 people this might not be worth the investment as cell phones would work just as well.
Read full review
Pros
  • No one likes getting a long thread of reply-alls. With Yammer announcements and updates can be shared — without cluttering your inbox.
  • Yammer's mobile apps are great for our on-the-go sales team to stay in touch with our office staff.
  • Yammer's social aspect makes it incredibly easy to use, even for our less tech savvy teammates. If you've used Facebook, learning Yammer will be a cinch.
Read full review
  • Easy deployment to end users, which assists with client deployment. Their email that provides access to download the software via multiple methods helps tremendously on the consulting side.
  • Easy interface for collaboration and voice. End users like the clean interface and ease of use.
  • An all-in-one solution for voice and collaboration. It delivers voicemail, chat, voice services, and mobility.
Read full review
Cons
  • While Yammer has been an easy transition from SharePoint, it's still relatively new and unknown. Some employees claim that feel like the product was just another "add on" to the entire Microsoft Office experience.
  • When introducing new employees to Yammer, they are not as receptive because of how widely used SharePoint is across businesses and industries.
  • Functionality is simple, but still vastly different from SharePoint, thus creating a learning curve.
Read full review
  • Easy to use pop-up window alerts you to incoming calls, lets you transfer to VM or other users, helpful for conference calling
  • Has chat feature to tag someone when they are on the phone, or you just don't want to call
  • App for smartphone allows for desk phone to cell phone collaboration
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
Read full review
It is easy to you for existig Mitel UC users, who are familiar with the Mitel way of things, but for green field enterprises, might be a ramp up period which in most cases would not be worth it as its competitor TEAMS is much easier and intuity to use.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Very available
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
It's a simple product but it does provide value.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Read full review
Support is typically handled by a reseller. Buyers should evaluate the reseller as much as they evaluate Mitel for the product suite. The few times when the reseller was not able to handle the issue directly, Mitel did step up and quickly answer/address the question/issue.
Read full review
Online Training
The training that Microsoft provides is very generic training for Yammer. I like the fact the training is short and easy to understand
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
We organically implemented the product
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
I like how Yammer has functions that are fun and interactive, which can give you much more to do than using Teams or even Microsoft Forms. Yammer helps people feel included and gives people a better sense of how their friends and co-workers are feeling on certain issues. Yammer is a lot more like a social media platform than a work tool even!
Read full review
I feel like it's hard to compare them, as the Yealink system we just implemented is a modern VOIP system, whereas the Mitel MiCollab system we had (even though we upgraded it once over the 12-years of usage) still wasn't as user-friendly for us as Yealink now is to us. In our experience, our user support from MetroNet is also lightyears better than that of Integra/Frontier. So that also adds a lot to our Yealink experience.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Nothing negative. But what we tend to forget is that Yammer is just a product, not a vision for change. The true and deep implementation and adoption of an enterprise network needs work and commitment, just like everything else. The true benefits will only emerge over time.
Read full review
  • Having a singular platform with all the necessary features for communication and collaboration has saved my organization both time and money.
  • The first-rate customer support has made integration and onboarding with new employees fast and easy.
  • The ability to share feedback and collaborate in real time has improved client outcomes through more robust services being provided.
Read full review
ScreenShots