Mimecast Cloud Archive vs. AppRiver from OpenText

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Mimecast Cloud Archive provides an archive storage solution for data retention, as well as search and retrieval of email, attachments and MS Teams conversations. The cloud archiving solution offers search capabilities for employees and automated tools for administrators that simplify management of mailboxes, e-discovery and litigation support.N/A
AppRiver from OpenText
Score 4.5 out of 10
N/A
AppRiver from OpenText (formerly from Zix from 2019, which was acquired by OpenText), is a hosted messaging gateway and security platform featuring anti-spam and email encryption / data loss capability.N/A
Pricing
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveAppRiver from OpenText
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveAppRiver from OpenText
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveAppRiver from OpenText
Considered Both Products
Mimecast Cloud Archive
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Does use Proofpoint in the past and it come better product than it.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast Cloud Archive is by far the better system. Firstly it integrates into existing security services provided by Mimecast and overall it is built purely for email and large volumes of both users and emails.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Its much faster to search for and send the emails as opposed to Kaseya where you need to restore the backup before you are able to search through the emails
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
We loved the intuitive dashboard and user management aspect and almost zero touch once configured, the ability for it to archive everything sent and received how quick it is to be able to delegate a former employees archive to someone else the ability to export content and …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast gave us some extra features that we believed were beneficial to our business. Removing the archive from the Microsoft hardware was also good to allow separation. Plus, adding the optional exchange backup made Mimecast a clear choice.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast has been the best archiving system so far that I've evaluated and/or used with the most "useful" features and best integration.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast was easier to use, had more features, and better priced.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast is overall a bit better value for the effort
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
The product offering is comparable, while the price is significantly less expensive in contrast to those offered by rivals. Additionally, the solution offers simple indexing and recovery, and it is nicely integrated into a variety of different ecosystems. Connecting across …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
The product offering is similar but the cost is lower in comparison to competitors. Also, the product is well integrated into various ecosystems and provides easy recovery and indexing. There are various connectors and APIs available which makes it easy to connect across …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
I was not involved in a decision-making process to purchase my podcast although I have used other tools in the past and my has the easiest interface to use And navigate. The learning curve is very short using this product. It’s a big benefit and plus that you were able to …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
I have only ever compared it to Barracuda's Archive One which is no longer available or supported.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast has been identified by Gartner as the top product in its magic quadrant. We found the product the easiest to implement with the best support and feature set. It has been very reliable and when we have had questions, feature requests or problems, the company has been …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Mimecast was a more complete and mature solution in our evaluation. Their services go far beyond just email archiving. Cost and the fact it is a cloud solution is a benefit.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
One of the big features of Mimecast is the ability to send large files. We used to use CItrix Sharefile for this but switched over to Mimecast's LFS for one large reason...since we are archiving all of our mail in Mimeast anyway we would have wanted these attachments, even if …
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
Users are not able to delete emails hence Mimecast EIA becomes a very useful tool during e-discovery. For EOA, they offer an inplace archive which means that emails can be deleted if the service is not turned on.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
To achieve the same outcomes, a mix of in-place archive & litigation hold rules needs to be implemented. This is quite convoluted, not to mention we usually encounter a poor experience when working with Exchange eDiscovery/Purview.
Chose Mimecast Cloud Archive
As opposed to its competitors, Mimecast Could Archive is a product designed IN the cloud. The other products were all basically traditional appliances hosted in the cloud and come with many limitations that Mimecast doesn't have. The ease of management and use of Mimecast is …
AppRiver from OpenText
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
At the time, Rackspace was too expensive, and Microsoft only sold to partners. AppRiver was reasonable and easy to work with. Now AppRiver from Zix, will only host our clients: They will not handle any support for our customers, as they use to.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
From AppRiver to Office 365, the support crew was exceptionally detailed and helpful. For new users, distribution groups, members on lists, and adding supplementary email addresses to current profiles for my teams, they led me through the process.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
AppRiver wins for customer support, cost, efficiency, and speed.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
AppRiver takes Microsoft 365 and simplifies the billing, provisioning, and support, to the point that we no longer have to deal with Microsoft directly, are able to simply focus on the product, rather than all the settings, setup, and all the other headaches typically …
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
AppRiver provides extra services that our previous email service provider did not. SharePoint had extra email security features - for the price.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
We evaluated several other vendors that I won't mention by name but found their partner program to be less attractive. If you are already using Office 365, give AppRiver a try. I think you will be pleased.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
I have no experience with other platforms.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
I used to love Rackspace but they have dropped. I still have some customers using their hosting but I'm slowly bringing them over to AppRiver.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
Sherweb: looked at them, but after talking and researching what other users were saying, we decided to use AppRiver. AppRiver's tech support wins out every time.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
Never used similar product.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
AppRiver's securetide spam filter is good, but I will say, it's the one product we moved away from. We switched to ProofPoint for email threat protection, and ProofPoint's quarantine notice and some other advanced features, at the time of our switch, were clear improvements …
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
We have been using AppRiver since our company inception and have not had any reason to look elsewhere or consider other options. We continue to be pleased with AppRiver.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
Many clients use GoDaddy for their email hosting. If you want to see a night and day difference in support, AppRiver is the way to go. I hate waiting on hold with GoDaddy, transferring through their automated menus, finding clients trapped in year-long commitments for email …
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
We switched for a reason.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
At the time, 5 years ago, we switched from Intermedia to Appriver based on price and portal features. AppRiver had better pricing, did support themselves, and integrated Office 365 into their own customer portal for easy management. They were the only ones at the time. I cannot …
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
We have not evaluated any other products offered by AppRiver other than what we currently use. We have what we need.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
There was one other company that I evaluated in the area but clearly made my decision based on a recommendation from someone that was also an AppRiver customer.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
In the past, we have just gone directly through Microsoft. This was generally easy, and the support Techs knowledgeable, but could take an hour to get to a tech and the tech was often difficult to understand. Microsoft is trying to discourage going directly through them now, …
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
Initially we were using Microsoft Office 365 for licensing, an on-premise Exchange server for e-mail, and The E-mail Laundry for spam filtering. After months of unsuccessful attempts to migrate our e-mail to Office 365, AppRiver was the only solution that successfully …
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
We used Postini as our email filtering for a couple of years until it was purchased by Google. We continued on with Google because we didn't want to have the pain of migrating to another platform. But, we research and decided on AppRiver. The migration over was very simple and …
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
Spamtitan doesn't have as much granular settings, but it is far superior at blocking malicious emails.
Chose AppRiver from OpenText
As Trend Micros WFBS is a whole suite I don't expect it to have the same capabilities and or performance as a dedicated service.
Scanning times are greatly reduced using a cloud-based service as I don't have to provide CPU and Ram to a VM to sit scanning emails or relegate my …
Features
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveAppRiver from OpenText
Secure Email Gateway
Comparison of Secure Email Gateway features of Product A and Product B
Mimecast Cloud Archive
-
Ratings
AppRiver from OpenText
8.5
Ratings
2% above category average
Anti-malware00 Ratings9.80 Ratings
Customizability00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Data Loss Protection00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Threat Detection00 Ratings9.70 Ratings
Sandboxing00 Ratings6.70 Ratings
End-to-End Encryption00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Management Tools00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveAppRiver from OpenText
Small Businesses
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Zoho Mail
Zoho Mail
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 9.9 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 9.3 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveAppRiver from OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Mimecast Cloud ArchiveAppRiver from OpenText
Likelihood to Recommend
Given all the threats that are out there and the fact many come in via email, I think Mimecast is a great solution for any business of any size. If your business is heavily regulated then you have even more reason to use Mimecast. You might be able to do a lot of these things yourself but why would you? Mimecast employees are experts, the best in the industry, at knowing how email works and how to protect it.
Read full review
I would highly recommend AppRiver for inbound email filtering. We have been very pleased with the performance and the ease of use. The occasional email does get through, but I have had that happen on any email filtering we have used in the past. Great product and great support as well
Read full review
Pros
  • It archives every email into and out of your enterprise including mail between internal users. This provides a legally acceptable archive that we can access at any point to find emails whether we need just one from a year ago or a lot to enter into a court case.
  • Since we have our MX record pointing to them first, they host all of our email in the cloud so users can access it even in the event our local email repository is down. We used this feature quite well during this past years Hurricane season.
  • Mimecast has a feature that allows me to sandbox all links, in emails, before users are redirected to them. This has saved us several times in that users clicked on links they should not have but Mimecast intercepted the request and stopped the user from going to the site.
Read full review
  • Ease of management for a MSP. Even though there is no integration w/ PSA tools currently, I don't see this as a negative. The management is multi-tenant and simple to navigate.
  • Support via chat is fast and very competent. Only downside is they are just available during extended business hours, not 24x7 on the chat.
  • Reselling Office 365 is very simple and gives us an advantage over our competitors. Includes pre sales support and post sale support.
  • Encrypted email services act much like others, it works very well and includes and Outlook Plug in to make it obvious you intend to send messaged encrypted.
  • Email continuity. Email queuing is included, so if your onsite server goes down, mail queues at the spam filter until service is restored. You can step it up w/ their email continuity service which give you access to your mail at the spam filter in cases where your mail server is down for an extended period of time.
Read full review
Cons
  • Provide the option to select the home screen/page
  • Provide the ability to search only using a time range in the case where no keyword or sender can be remembered (can limit search period to 3-6months)
  • Allow the user to be able to reset their own password themselves
Read full review
  • We had an issue with bills coming to us instead of going directly to the client that took a little longer to fix than we would have preferred.
  • It would be nice if the bills included the domain name. When I was receiving my client's bill, it was difficult to tell which domains the bill was for.
  • Cost a little more than from Microsoft directly.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
The system does what we require of it and the support is good. No need to replace it at the moment.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The archive is easy to use and the searching is highly customizable. You can easily search based on timeframe, sender, recipient, words, phrases, and attachments. The ability to search keywords within attachments, body, and subject line is incredibly helpful. We're able to quickly and easily find what we're looking for.
Read full review
AppRiver is very easy to use. A new employee can begin using it on their first day.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
There is never an issue. Everytime I have needed to access my own personal search archive or globally search across the whole business it works each time. I cannot recall a time where the service was down when needed to be used and all our staff use it daily.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
The stability of the tool is the biggest factor, it has a fantastic uptime and the loading speed is exceptional. Long gone are the days of waiting for Outlook to open up a traditional PST archive, I can simply click, find what I need and go, usually, before outlook has opened the archive. It is an exceptionally efficient tool.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
It does a good job. The support team of the product was good and responsive and was also able to fix the issues I was experiencing at the time. It isn't perfect and takes some time to set up properly in the environment but once set up the product does what it is supposed to do which is what you are paying for.
Read full review
AppRiver's live support is above what I expected, and I use it exclusively. I always get a professional, courteous, and knowledgeable tech that is easy to understand within a few minutes of placing a call. If you do have to leave a message they have always promptly returned my call.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
We used Mimecast professional services for the implementation and it was flawless as we were migrating from a competitor's product. The only downside was the amount of time required to ingest all the data as this was coming from a few different sources and in some cases it took months to migrate and index all the content. Apart from that the process was very well guided, with plenty of communication all throughout and without any major issues or downtime.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Mimecast gave us some extra features that we believed were beneficial to our business. Removing the archive from the Microsoft hardware was also good to allow separation. Plus, adding the optional exchange backup made Mimecast a clear choice.
Read full review
AppRiver takes Microsoft 365 and simplifies the billing, provisioning, and support, to the point that we no longer have to deal with Microsoft directly, are able to simply focus on the product, rather than all the settings, setup, and all the other headaches typically associated with setting up a Microsoft365 Tenant.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Before we enabled our Mimecast archive, we had multiple cases of users who had 10k+ emails "disappear" and could not find them. Trying to figure this out with Microsoft is near impossible. IT spent 5-10 hours on each situation trying to find, recover, and move the emails back into the user's mailbox.
  • A couple term cases happened as well where the user deleted everything in their mailbox and recoverable area had be cleared automatically by the time we found out. One of them would have been 28k emails and would take days to recover.
  • Since having Mimecast, it is a matter of going to the mailbox in the Sync and Recover and clicking a few things and restoring all the data. Super easy and restoring the data takes less time than manually doing it with a Microsoft Content Search export.
  • We are talking a few minutes vs 5-10+ hours.
Read full review
  • We were able to drop our email scanning software that was taking hours to clear the cache of emails daily. The reduction in delays on email scanning improved our efficiency as emails take seconds to minutes to get to where they are going not hours.
  • Encrypted email service (Cypher-Post) is difficult to use as well as our recipients do not like how difficult it is to use. The stub emails that contain links often get deleted because people are trained not to click on links in emails. This has caused substantial delays in people getting emails from us.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Mimecast Cloud Archive Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of