Miro vs. SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Miro
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working.
$0
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
The SAP Signavio portfolio offers an integrated platform that helps usersto realign the organization and bring changes, with a suite of products that support business processes. The SAP Signavio portfolio offers a range of business transformation solutions to serve the emerging practice of customer excellence (CEX). SAP Signavio solutions bring together a full 360-degree view of outside-in and inside-out thinking, translating experiences into operational reality by putting the customer at the…N/A
Pricing
MiroSAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Editions & Modules
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MiroSAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsMonthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MiroSAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Considered Both Products
Miro
Chose Miro
Miro is the more collaborative option, offering the ability for many individuals to work on the same item real-time. Though it does create some duplicate entry, we've found this added cost is minimal compared to the opportunity cost of lost collaboration.
Chose Miro
Mural is too simple figjam is too much for designers and devs only, not for broader business
Chose Miro
Earlier we were using different products for different requirements, such as Microsoft whiteboard, lucidcharts for diagrams. But as Miro has all these features and other additional features which makes it "all in one place" and enable us to save out time which earlier was …
Chose Miro
Miro is great for collaborating. I think it definitely is better than Mural and Jamboard because it has more features and it's easier to use. Compared to FigJam, as a designer I would probably choose Figjam to have everything in the same product. However, in my opinion, Miro …
Chose Miro
We ran a business case analysis for these, and they didn't come close. Visual omnipresent collaboration is a must; list of different features is way longer in Miro; Kanban and its views is less clunky and requires less fiddling out of the box — Trello needed to be set up …
Chose Miro
Miro was a big hit with all the teams involved, it was easy to stand up and start using, easy to license, and easy to manage. Other tools offered stronger connections to tools in their product suite without the freedom and ease of use that Miro did.
Chose Miro
Miro has more integrations than Marq and the brand templating that Marq excels in was less relevant to our work.
Chose Miro
I was a while ago that I use Mural. At that stage the features where similar. However, Miro has developed at a very quick pace and is always adding features to improve the product, so I have had no reason to look elsewhere.
Chose Miro
I think they all have very good features and are similar to a certain extent, however, Miro includes all the interactive features and allows you to create without limitations on format or page sizes, or oversaturation of users within the same session, which is why I appreciate …
Chose Miro
I used a bit Microsoft Whiteboard some years ago, but at this time it was far behind Miro
Chose Miro
Miro basically cover the needs of all the other tools. I started using Miro extensively during the pandemic and at that point only Jamboard provided similar options and was free when collaborating in a bigger group and when not everyone had a license. This is still the main …
Chose Miro
Miro is a perfect match for organizations looking to enhance productivity and a single stop solution for collaboration.
Chose Miro
As I've mentioned, I've used Figjam before. Figjam is better for more detailed and design based ideation workshops. But Miro is better for people without much tech ability.
Chose Miro
We assessed these tools to gain a better understanding because they are excellent and have certain unique features. But in the end, we chose Miro since it offers all the features that ClickUp, Stormboard, and Conceptboard do. Additionally, it has a special feature that lets you …
Chose Miro
We tested every product, but the biggest problem we encountered was that most of them required plugins in order to centralize all of our work. Other problems included the products' excessive price, which was higher than Miro's. Last but not least, Miro offered us an all-in-one …
Chose Miro
In my opinion, Microsoft White Board does not compare. So much lag, much more limited functionality (ability to customize visuals and text), no ability to lock content, etc. Mural I haven't used as much. Probably closer in competition to Miro - felt pretty similar. Miro I …
Chose Miro
That's harder as Miro is a corporate tool so I can use it - I have searched the web but not really tried any others
Chose Miro
I had to select Miro because of its superior integration, which works effortlessly, and its better functionality.
Chose Miro
Providing better templates and customization options, also real time collaboration tools.
Chose Miro
FigJam is particularly tailored for design led product teams so lack the versatility which Miro provides
Better for workshop facilitation but clucky UI
Chose Miro
Jira is actively used in conjunction with Miro to track activities, and it offers functionalities that differ from Miro. However, it is much easier to create tables and diagrams in Miro. The advantage of Jira is that it enables the management of digital projects more …
Chose Miro
I find Miro to be more user-friendly than Figma, where we had a very steep learning curve trying to achieve real-time collaboration with both tech and non-tech users. I haven't personally spent a lot of time using that tool or others, however. At this point, I have a strong …
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
I reviewed Chelonia as it has a lot of reviews that it is more user friendly than Signavio. I have also seen that it integrates well with UI Path which is helpful with RPA. Ultimately went forward with Signavio due to the cost of Celonis. I hope I made the right decision.
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
was a bundle offering years ago
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
faster , simpler, better
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
due to better connection with SAP product and usage of SAP best practices
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Simpler tu use and more modern
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite stacks up mainly in collaboration features and definition of standards.
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Easier to use and understand. Users liked it and rated it better!
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Yes, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite is much more advanced and robust tool. While Visio helps visualize process in a good way, it lacks an analysis or reporting feature making it a basic tool.
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
SAP Signavio Process Collaboration Hub is a standout feature, providing a centralized platform for stakeholders to access, share, and collaborate on process models in real-time. This level of collaboration was superior to what we experienced with other tools such as Lucidchart …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
User friendly interface with wide variety of process design and modelling features, which is easy to learn and understand. Plus, it is from a reputed brand SAP, hence clients readily accept this choice of tool for modelling.
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Celonis is more matured and easy to use
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Signavio loses in process mining capability against Celonis in many areas like usability and look and feel. Signavio is superior in its BPM related capabilities against e.g. QPR and MS Visio due to its feature set. Against all of them Signavio has better overall solution suite …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Celonis
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
We are involved in a sap erp implementation and signavio was the easiest choice, the team appreciate mostly the collaboration hub.
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
The features we knew from Signavio regarding approval workflows were the reason why we considered Signavio as our single source of truth for processes. But the possibilities are much wider. That is what we learned during the last couple of weeks and months during our project. …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
User-friendliness was a key determinant. The other main reason was already having other SAP systems implemented across the company.
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
The application is very simple to use and provides a number of features that allow me to visually represent my thoughts and ideas. Particularly intriguing to me is the potential for real-time collaboration with clients and external partners. This greatly facilitates teamwork …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
We were able to end the use of archive versions thanks to SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite, and everyone has access to the most recent archive. Mac and Windows users can collaborate on a single document. A design tool that spans the concept phase, design phase, and …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
We considered a number of comparable solutions, including Lucidchart and Bizagi, before settling on SAP Signavio. Although they have respectable process mapping capabilities, none of these solutions could compare to SAP Signavio's sophisticated process simulation and seamless …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
We considered alternatives like Microsoft Visio and Bizagi before deciding on SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite. Although these technologies have their advantages, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite stood out thanks to its user-friendly design, powerful …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Business process management platform, Bizagi, is powerful but often too complex for smaller organizations. This is why our team opted for SAP Signavio, which offers simplicity and ease of use making it a more practical choice. SAP Signavio offers the right balance of features …
Chose SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
I have not evaluated other products as we were looking to implement S4 and use Signavio for business process mapping
Features
MiroSAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Miro
-
Ratings
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
7.6
Ratings
7% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Miro
-
Ratings
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
8.0
Ratings
5% below category average
Process designer00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Process simulation00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Business rules engine00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
SOA support00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Process player00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Support for modeling languages00 Ratings8.90 Ratings
Form builder00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Model execution00 Ratings6.40 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Miro
-
Ratings
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
8.1
Ratings
4% below category average
Social collaboration tools00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
Miro
-
Ratings
SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
7.2
Ratings
13% below category average
Content management00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MiroSAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Small Businesses
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MiroSAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(0 ratings)
6.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.5
(0 ratings)
7.8
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.4
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.1
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
7.2
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
5.8
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MiroSAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
I remember a project where all our different teams were involved in it. I created a board with timelines, KPIs, and customer journey stages, and each team added their input live. We were all able to work together in real time, view the entire project, and leave comments without switching apps, which is why it worked fantastically for us. Everyone benefited from the hours of time it saved, and we made a good profit on that project, for which I was named employee of the month.
Read full review
Pros: 1. It reduces technical debt and accelerates a smooth transition, while harmonizing across data migration regions which replaces the legacy customization that are not for S4/HANA. 2. It cuts operational cost by 30% - 40% and improves SLA adherence, while process intelligence identifies duplicate or redundant approval steps when we know SAP ecosystems ties all modules together for better data insights. Cons: 1. Complicated and costly for small businesses. 2. Mature process required for better data feeding and data insights. 3. If non-SAP system data feed might cause misleading and incomplete data insights
Read full review
Pros
  • Especially useful project planning with functions like whiteboard and great collaboration features.
  • Miros presentation mode is great for walking people through and explaining a concept.
  • If someone can’t join a meeting, we record a Talktrack. Its like a mini-presentation that people can watch later. Can be extremely useful at times.
Read full review
  • We primarily use SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite to create UX designs and concepts as well as A/B test variants.
  • Specifically, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite NOS serves as a design tool for our internal and external UX designers.
  • We are able to communicate design ideas across all corporate directions.
Read full review
Cons
  • When using the find functionality to locate an item in a Miro board, I do not like that it keeps my previous searched term. Other programs, like Excel, do this but they have it so that you can easily overwrite the previously-searched term.
  • It would be helpful if you could search by a particular frame, instead of the entire board. For our quarterly backlog review, we often have items that carry over, so there are duplicates on the board. Being able to search by a frame would make this easier.
  • Understanding who can access a board is not always clear to me.
Read full review
  • One small disadvantage is that the mobile app has fewer features than the web interface. It is primarily handy for viewing process maps while on the go.
  • Another minor drawback is that, based on the complexity of your operations, the process of onboarding and setup may require a considerable amount of time, necessitating several weeks of onboarding activities.
  • Finally, a handful of the third-party integrations felt functionally tacked on. But, the basic product works flawlessly.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I have advocate for the renew of Miro quite few times, however, it is not under my control as the decision is made in another team with their own budget. I would buy for my own entrepreneur projects (1-2 members) as I do know the value and work there 100%. So, I would pay out of my own pocket to get the value. However, If I wouldn't know the value it provides, it would be hard to decide with the current freemium features
Read full review
Straight forward and smooth approach!
Read full review
Usability
The platform is flexible, easy to use, and simple because Miro is a great visualization tool that makes it easy to collaborate on creating charts. It helps in creating workflows and other designs easily and securely. It supports integrations with major cloud storage solutions and office suites. On top of that, it provides a decent free plan, which is sufficient for basic usage.
Read full review
It's very simple and easy to use
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Read full review
Yes its always available
Read full review
Performance
Sometimes it gets quite slow and there is a correlation between this and the size of the board. Hence we are trying to segment the boards based on product stages or projects so that the size doesn't go big. When you go from discovery to delivery on a simple board, it will get large and difficult to load, even crash or go white screen
Read full review
Everything is very fast
Read full review
Support Rating
We have never reached out to or contacted support because Miro's platform has been incredibly intuitive and user-friendly. The comprehensive resources available, such as tutorials, documentation, and community forums, have provided all the guidance we needed. The seamless integration with our existing tools and the reliability of the platform have ensured that we rarely encounter issues that require external assistance. This self-sufficiency has allowed us to focus more on our projects and collaboration without interruptions. Overall, our experience with Miro has been smooth and efficient, eliminating the need for additional support
Read full review
Whenever we needed assistance, the support team was prompt and knowledgeable, providing clear and effective solutions to our issues.
Read full review
In-Person Training
No answers on this topic
Real useful trainings and hand ons
Read full review
Online Training
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
Very complete and useful for day to day operations
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Easy to learn, Miro has a series of videos on YouTube that effectively taught this program to my team members and me. The program is drag-and-drop and works excellently. People pick up on how to use it efficiently, and it's great for organizing ideas more freely. This product is more challenging for some older audiences who are not accustomed to using a touchpad, but for most, it was very easy to use.
Read full review
Training is taking way longer than expected. We have had more than 50 hours of training and still do not feel proficient enough to do anything meaningful with Process Intelligence. The Process Insights are pretty intuitive but does take a willingness to dig in and explore, but in general good right out of the box.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Miro is the more collaborative option, offering the ability for many individuals to work on the same item real-time. Though it does create some duplicate entry, we've found this added cost is minimal compared to the opportunity cost of lost collaboration.
Read full review
The application is very simple to use and provides a number of features that allow me to visually represent my thoughts and ideas. Particularly intriguing to me is the potential for real-time collaboration with clients and external partners. This greatly facilitates teamwork and enables quick response to changes or fresh ideas. Another benefit of SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite is the large number of applications that can be integrated and the ability to directly transfer concepts, mental maps, and solution blueprints to presentations. I am generally very pleased with SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite, and I would highly recommend it to any business looking for an effective and user-friendly solution to foster the development of creative ideas and innovative foci
Read full review
Scalability
Miro is great for scaling. In every department and subdivision across my entire organization, there is someone using it. From Sales to marketing, to manufacturing and operations; and even in legal and finance, there isn't a process or a department that is not using Miro, and if they aren't, they're missing out! Even at the highest to the lowest levels of the organization, it is essential for virtual collaboration.
Read full review
Definitely a 10!
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We reduced the number of tools needed by consolidating planning, brainstorming, and documentation in Miro.
  • It improved knowledge retention by creating a single visual source of truth for projects.
  • Miro improved stakeholder engagement, leading to faster approvals and fewer project delays.
  • It accelerated project delivery by enabling faster decision-making in remote workshops.
Read full review
  • By locating and removing process bottlenecks and redundancies, SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite has greatly improved our operational efficiency.
  • The software has been crucial in ensuring that our processes adhere to industry norms and regulations while lowering the risks associated with compliance.
  • Real-time collaboration capabilities in SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite have accelerated cross-functional communication, facilitating quicker decision-making and more successful process upgrades.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.

SAP Signavio Process Transformation Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Signavio Process InsightsScreenshot of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence - InvestigationScreenshot of SAP Signavio Process Intelligence - DashboardsScreenshot of SAP Signavio Journey Modeler - Journey Complexity ScoreScreenshot of SAP Signavio Process Explorer - Best practice and process knowledgeScreenshot of SAP Signavio Process Manager - Live Insights