TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

OpenText ALM Octane vs. Tricentis qTest

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText ALM Octane

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AOpenText™ ALM Octane, formerly from Micro Focus, includes integrated planning, continuous integration, test management, and release management. With these capabilities, it helps Agile teams and DevOps toolchains to deliver high-quality software with insight, traceability, analytics-focused end-to-end visibility, and continuous quality.N/A

    Tricentis qTest

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Pricing
    OpenText ALM OctaneTricentis qTest
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText ALM OctaneTricentis qTest
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    OpenText ALM OctaneTricentis qTest
    Considered Both Products
    OpenText
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    We felt like for the feature set and due to the fact it was mid-range on the cost, it was a good choice. It also has some other plugins which we plan to utilize at some point like Tosca.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis qTest ranks well among all test management platforms. For smaller teams with less activity or reporting requirements, qTest can be overkill. However, as organizations evolve and become more scrutinized or chaotic, qTest is one of, if not, the best option to ensure all …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    OpenText ALM OctaneTricentis qTest
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of OpenText ALM Octane and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    OpenText ALM Octane
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    7.5
    27 Ratings
    Centralized test management00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.223 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings7.922 Ratings
    User Ratings
    OpenText ALM OctaneTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.4
    (2 ratings)
    8.1
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)