TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Tricentis qTest

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Pricing
    Tricentis qTest
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Tricentis qTest
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptional
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Tricentis qTest
    Considered Both Products
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    qTest was in general easier to use and more intuitive in its layout
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    I have used HP AlM, Redmine , ADO in past and I loved qTest for its ability to integrate with CI tool , automation frameworks and Jira.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    As I am not the actual decision maker of which tool to purchase. I have always liked the Tricentis qTest tool. Decision has been made by the top management, The tool has proven is value and for the Same reason it is still being used.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Open option for automation testing & easy to set up.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    looking at the positive features like 3rd party integration, the Tricentis qTest stacks up along with providing the custom build and event driven workflows with open-source solutions (Azure, DevOps, Teams etc). Manages and schedule automated testing along with creating report …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    • Value for money
    • Best in class
    • All the feature which other tool are having
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows.
    Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements.
    Supports robust requirements traceability, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis is easy to use and user friendly. Less time consuming with lot of good utilities. And for better test management. qTest also stacks up better than the above tools due to its efficiency, test case interface and test execution interface. Excellent comments area and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    - It was not our decision to use qTest as a tool, as this was a management decision.
    - Since I have used many Test Management Tools I can compare for e.g
    The Reporting and Statistics in qTest is very impressive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis qtest is well suited as it serves the purpose for both quality assurance and business management. It is very simple for non technical users to write test cases in free hand and they don’t have to bother about traceability as it is automatically handled by this …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    I have worked on Jira, but i found it more difficult interface to handle. It was not user friendly. The defect management was also not impressive. qTest experience actually helped me to take decision while evaluating.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    I'm not the decision maker, so I can't provide objective comparison criteria, but I can say that Tricentis QTest is a reliable tool for Test Management.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Still evaluating. TestRail seems to be a far better solution but we need to solve migration issues.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis qTest provides a neater package, with easier test execution and better integration with our other tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Prior to qTest, the teams were using TestLink.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    The main tool we compared to Tricentis qTest Explorer was the "Steps Recorder" that comes with Windows. We selected Tricentis qTest Explorer because, at least at the time, Steps Recorder would sometimes skip recording arbitrary steps, which didn't meet our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Didn’t have the same ease of use for us and didn’t integrate as well into our test process.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    None of our previous tools we listed in the available drop-down options. We had previously used Spira Test and Xray as our test repositories. We are currently evaluating Test Rail, Zephyr, PractiTest, and others.

    From an organizational perspective, qTest is better than Xray as …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    We felt like for the feature set and due to the fact it was mid-range on the cost, it was a good choice. It also has some other plugins which we plan to utilize at some point like Tosca.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    We selected QASymphony because even though all the testing software are Agile compatible test management tools that offer complete coverage of the whole process of quality control: requirements, testing and management of test cases, problem management and reports. It offers …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Tricentis qTest
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    Tricentis qTest
    7.5
    27 Ratings
    Centralized test management7.426 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules7.223 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories7.68 Ratings
    Test execution reporting7.426 Ratings
    Defect management7.922 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)