Optimizely Web Experimentation vs. ZoomInfo Marketing

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Whether launching a first test or scaling a sophisticated experimentation program, Optimizely Web Experimentation aims to deliver the insights needed to craft high-performing digital experiences that drive engagement, increase conversions, and accelerate growth.N/A
ZoomInfo Marketing
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
ZoomInfo MarketingOS helps Demand Generation and Account-Based Marketers target, engage, and convert leads to buyers by giving them data, insight-driven orchestration, and personalized engagement across multiple channels such as display and social advertising, email, website chat and onsite conversion.N/A
Pricing
Optimizely Web ExperimentationZoomInfo Marketing
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Optimizely Web ExperimentationZoomInfo Marketing
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Optimizely Web ExperimentationZoomInfo Marketing
Considered Both Products
Optimizely Web Experimentation
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I do not have any issues with AB Tasty. They are great. We went with Optimizely because they have several other products that will work together with our business model. Optimizely has grown and it now offers many other products that work with experimentation like CMS, CMP, ODP …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Google Optimize and Hotjar
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely is highly intuitive, allowing marketers or non-technical folks to run experiments without complicated coding. It also allows for various types of experimentation, including A/B tests, multivariate tests, and personalization. This capability will enable teams to run …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
This is a platform that was already implemented when I started with my current company.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
The feature set and ecosystem for Optimizely seemed much more robust and scalable.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
None of them have a best in class stats engine and live within an ecosystem of marketing technology products the way that Optimizely does, so the scalability of using any one of those tools is limited as compared to using Optimizely Web Experimentation.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
It's a lot more, well, site stacked, it's way better than that. Adobe Target. I think the UI is easier to use on Optimizely. The one thing that I would say comparatively is our analytics talking to each other. Obviously Adobe, we use Adobe Analytics and Adobe Target, so they …
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely is more user-friendly and cost-effective, ideal for experimentation-focused teams, while Adobe Target excels in advanced personalization and seamless integration within the Adobe ecosystem, making it better suited for large enterprises.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We analyzed a few competitors and optimizely had the most robust feature set and scalability
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I feel Optimizely Web Experimentation stacked up well against Split
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We haven't used other Optimizely products apart from Web Experimentation.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation was more robust and able to handle the broad array of sites we run than VWO. It has been a great platform to easily add additional sites onto, but still providing a universal overview of all of them, making management a simple task.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
we used Optimizely Web Experimentation then AB Tasty but came back to Optimizley because of its robust stat sig and features as well as all of the products we will be able to work in synchronization.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
We use both, it just depends on the use case. I personally prefer feature experimentation but I see why both are useful.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation has more robust product for experimentation specialists than VWO
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Handshake by Shopify (discontinued)
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Better tools but more expensive
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
It exists unlike google optimize
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Optimizely Web Experimentation appeared to be much more user friendly and easier to self-manage than AB Tasty
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
I think that Optimizely Web Experimentation is much easier to implement and use, but the entire Adobe Experience Cloud provides a ton of value if you have multiple products.
Chose Optimizely Web Experimentation
Honestly, Optimizely Web Experimentation has its pros and cons just like any other tool. We use Optimizely because we have resources here in the country that can help us when e have issues. The support team being local helps a lot so we don't have long wait times to get things …
ZoomInfo Marketing
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
The automation from the Workflows is the biggest difference and a great one! It's also easier to build audiences and be more targeted in the leads we serve ads to.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
Has more detailed data and information
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
6sense and Demandbase One
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
Rollworks was extremely difficult to use. We used the platform for three years and I always got stuck when trying to create an ad campaign. Total opposite of ZoomInfo Marketing where I can easily create an ad campaign in minutes. We can update our campaigns at any time and see …
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
We have Zoominfo Sales as well. We decided we needed to have both Sales and Marketing to marry them together. We are so happy we did! We really needed to have the entire package together. We are able to research our customers within sales and then we are able to serve them ads.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
We have evaluated these as platforms we are considering/moving to as replacement of ZoomInfo Marketing.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
ZoomInfo has a wonderful suite of products, which I consider to be first in class for sales-related pursuits as well as marketing. They have different purposes so they don't inherently compete with each other, but I am happy to say ZoomInfo marketing is quickly becoming my …
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
We looked into SalesIntel briefly - doesn't look as robust in their offering for the price. We signed a multi-year deal with ZoomInfo Marketing and we're happy with it.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
I was not involved with the decision making of the evaluation of this, I only heard we also looked at these other options. But based on our company's overall sentiment of ZoomInfo Marketing I think the decision makers did make the right choice.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
ZoomInfo is easy to use and navigate, plus is more accurate than the competition. But the price per license is the highest on the market and not affordable by everyone.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
6Sense emphasizes a data model more, which is great, but it takes a ton of time to set up and didn't work well for my previous company due to the nature of the business. MarketingOS is a much more flexible platform due to the robust nature of its account and contact database.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
If you are already using ZoomInfo SalesOS, then you're almost obligated to get MarketingOS since they don't integrate with Demandbase or 6sense.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
Zoominfo combined marketing automation with industry-leading lead intelligence. This was a no-brainer for us.
Chose ZoomInfo Marketing
I haven't used any other platforms so cannot compare.
Features
Optimizely Web ExperimentationZoomInfo Marketing
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.0
Ratings
2% below category average
ZoomInfo Marketing
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys6.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.2
Ratings
4% below category average
ZoomInfo Marketing
7.9
Ratings
3% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation8.40 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation7.70 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Traffic allocation control9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization7.80 Ratings00 Ratings
ABM sales intelligence00 Ratings8.30 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
8.3
Ratings
1% below category average
ZoomInfo Marketing
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool9.30 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics8.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking8.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
ZoomInfo Marketing
7.3
Ratings
10% below category average
Automated routing and prioritization00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Customer interaction histories00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Engagement data tracking00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
ZoomInfo Marketing
7.7
Ratings
1% below category average
Ad campaign creation00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Display advertising00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Contextual advertising00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Social advertising00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Ad reporting and analytics00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
ZoomInfo Marketing
7.0
Ratings
11% below category average
3rd party intent signals00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Downstream intent signals00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Account identification00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
ABM Integrations
Comparison of ABM Integrations features of Product A and Product B
Optimizely Web Experimentation
-
Ratings
ZoomInfo Marketing
7.0
Ratings
18% below category average
Automated workflow & orchestration00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Optimizely Web ExperimentationZoomInfo Marketing
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Dealfront
Dealfront
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 8.3 out of 10
TechTarget Priority Engine
TechTarget Priority Engine
Score 9.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Optimizely Web ExperimentationZoomInfo Marketing
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.3
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
3.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
6.3
(0 ratings)
Configurability
6.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Optimizely Web ExperimentationZoomInfo Marketing
Likelihood to Recommend
I think it can serve the whole spectrum of experiences from people who are just getting used to web experimentation. It's really easy to pick up and use. If you're more experienced then it works well because it just gets out of the way and lets you really focus on the experimentation side of things. So yeah, strongly recommend. I think it is well suited both to small businesses and large enterprises as well. I think it's got a really low barrier to entry. It's very easy to integrate on your website and get results quickly. Likewise, if you are a big business, it's incrementally adoptable, so you can start out with one component of optimizing and you can build there and start to build in things like data CMS to augment experimentation as well. So it's got a really strong a pathway to grow your MarTech platform if you're a small company or a big company.
Read full review
ZoomInfo Marketing can be used to re-target companies already in your sales process or familiar with you (i.e., have been to your website or engaged with you in some way). You may not get a large number of conversions through a cold display campaign, but ZI Marketing is a great way to stay at the top of your buyers' minds and provide them with bottom-of-the-funnel content through advertising.
Read full review
Pros
  • The Platform contains drag-and-drop editor options for creating variations, which ease the A/B tests process, as it does not require any coding or development resources.
  • Establishing it is so simple that even a non-technical person can do it perfectly.
  • It provides real-time results and analytics with robust dashboard access through which you can quickly analyze how different variations perform. With this, your team can easily make data-driven decisions Fastly.
Read full review
  • The ease of campaign creation is amazing! I can get a campaign set up in just a few minutes.
  • The reporting allows us to easily see the performance of our ads. There is no guesswork.
  • I love being able to create audiences from ZoomInfo tools such as Websights, intent, workflows and lists. This allows us to target a very specific audience that we otherwise would not have access to.
Read full review
Cons
  • The results view is dense and difficult to package easily for leadership, and when filtering by segment it's hard to read comparative outcomes without clearing or swapping filters
  • The organization of experiments and statuses is a cluttered list and the search is limited in use - would love to see that improve with time
  • There are so many other MarTech products out there, would love to see more dedicated integrations so we don't have to invest in something like Zapier or Tray to build hacky automations
Read full review
  • Sometimes the contact information is not up to date (wrong phone numbers or emails)
  • Sometimes the integration between ZoomInfo Marketing and other software we use lags
  • Sometimes information such as recent job changes or changes within company are not accurate or missing
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Because it's an incredible and essential tool for my line of work as a conversion optimization specialist. Really couldn't do my job nearly as effectively without it. It's paid for itself many times over and I feel like I'm only beginning to unlock the tools potential.
Read full review
It just complements every effort that our sales and marketing team go through. We also use other zoom products, and this meshes so well with them. It has cut down the time we need for results in marketing and sales, as well as increasing the success rate of the actions we choose. We're seeing greater ROI on efforts since we started.
Read full review
Usability
Optimizely Web Experimentation's visual editor is handy for non-technical or quick iterative testing. When it comes to content changes it's as easy as going into wordpress, clicking around, and then seeing your changes live--what you see is what you get. The preview and approval process for sharing built experiments is also handy for sharing experiments across teams for QA purposes or otherwise.
Read full review
I think it's great for marketing and sales alignment and it gives great insights and data that we can translate over to our LinkedIn advertising, but I think the reporting limitations aren't great. The discrepancies don't provide full confidence in the numbers. But, as a tool to become more targeted based on websights and sales goals it's great!
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's availability as a 10 out of 10. The software is reliable and does not experience any application errors or unplanned outages. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
I would rate Optimizely Web Experimentation's performance as a 9 out of 10. Pages load quickly, reports are complete in a reasonable time frame, and the software does not slow down any other software or systems that it integrates with. Additionally, the customer service and technical support teams are always available to help with any issues or questions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
They always are quick to respond, and are so friendly and helpful. They always answer the phone right away. And [they are] always willing to not only help you with your problem, but if you need ideas they have suggestions as well.
Read full review
They spend most of their time pontificating on rudimentary matters. They tried to blame their own mistakes and shortcomings on the client rather than themselves.
Read full review
Online Training
The tool itself is not very difficult to use so training was not very useful in my opinion. It did not also account for success events more complex than a click (which my company being ecommerce is looking to examine more than a mere click).
Read full review
Calls using Zoom remote sessions, emails chat.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
The implementation through the tag management system took a bit of trial and error at first, mostly due to the asynchronous nature of the TMS. We had to manipulate the implementation to assure that the Optimizely code was written to the page at the right time to allow the experiment content load in the browser without showing any of the original content first. We also needed to make some adjustments to the TMS code to get the integration with Site Catalyst timed appropriately.
Read full review
They never ended up uploading the custom intent topics until months after we submitted them. It was difficult to select the custom intent topics in the first place as well.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The ability to do A/B testing in Optimizely along with the associated statistical modelling and audience segmentation means it is a much better solution than using something like Google Analytics were a lot more effort is required to identify and isolate the specific data you need to confidently make changes
Read full review
RollWorks was extremely difficult to use. We used the platform for three years and I always got stuck when trying to create an ad campaign. Total opposite of ZoomInfo Marketing where I can easily create an ad campaign in minutes. We can update our campaigns at any time and see changes right away. In RollWorks, we had to wait at least 24 hours to see any changes. We never saw any hard results from RollWorks with three years of using the platform. We saw results with ZoomInfo right away.
Read full review
Scalability
It's incredibly flexible and adapts well to organizations of all sizes, whether you’re running a single site or managing multiple departments and platforms. The ability to deploy experiments seamlessly across different environments is a huge plus, especially for growing businesses. While it’s highly scalable, the last point would depend on the right team leveraging its full potential.
Read full review
Enable scalable process and implementation to use for marketing and sales.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • we saved money by not implementing certain copy/design
  • we learned that customers from different states react different to a variation
  • we are slowly learning where conversion happens and where to fix the frictions
  • Testing shorter vs longer journeys increased funnel conversion in some states - we avoided implementing this nationwide
Read full review
  • We have found a lower CPC across our pages
  • Tracking characteristics on types of businesses on our pages - also very close to our dream persona
  • Build a weekly workflow internally between sales and marketing to use the incoming contacts and increasing number of qualified leads to hand off to sales
Read full review
ScreenShots

Optimizely Web Experimentation Screenshots

Screenshot of AI-Powered Experimentation with Opal:

- Instant Test Ideas: Generates high-quality A/B test ideas based on any goals and audience insights.
- Smarter Experimentation: The AI can suggest impactful variations, reducing guesswork and increasing test velocity.
- More Than Just Ideas: From hypothesis generation to analyzing results, Opal helps optimize every stage of the experimentation process.Screenshot of the Web Experimentation Visual Editor :

- Tweak experiments using the visual editor or dive into custom code when needed.
- Modify elements, update styling, or add dynamic behaviors.
- Ensure perfect variations while keeping control over every detail of the experiment.Screenshot of AI Content Suggestions:

- Generates copy variations to supercharge experiments.
- The AI suggests high-impact messaging for tests when hovering over a field.
- AI-powered content suggestions help skip the brainstorming process.Screenshot of Advanced Audience Targeting:

- Delivers personalized experiences by targeting users based on behaviors, attributes, and real-time conditions.
- Defines precise audience segments using first-party data, geolocation, and device type.
- Can test and optimize for different audience groups to maximize impact and engagement.Screenshot of Custom Templates in the Visual Editor:

- Offers pre-built templates for common test setups.
- Standardized variations and maintains brand integrity with reusable templates.
- Templates can be customized visually or tweak them with code for full flexibility.Screenshot of the Web Experimentation Results Page:

- Data visualizations help interpret experiment performance.
- Displays which variations are winning with built-in statistical significance calculations.
- Results can be filtered by audience segments, events, and conversions to uncover key trends.