Primavera Unifier vs. UpKeep Maintenance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Primavera Unifier
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Facilities Asset Management Software Oracle Primavera Unifier aims to drive best practices that increase visibility and efficiency, allowing users to leverage extensive configurability along with prebuilt processes to automate any business process with custom forms and workflows. Key Benefits: - Configurability and governance—automate any process, from simple to complex, with total control and data ownership - Cloud or on-premise deployment - A comprehensive…N/A
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Score 7.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
UpKeep allows users to snap a picture of a broken piece of equipment, create a work order, and schedule it for repair - all from a mobile device. UpKeep is designed for facility, property, restaurant, and manufacturing managers looking to improve communication by enabling real-time status updates for their teams. The vendor says it is a modern, intuitive, and customizable CMMS that is proven to expedite workflow processes. Capabilities include: -Add co-workers and easily assign work…
$40
per technician/per month
Pricing
Primavera UnifierUpKeep Maintenance Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$40
per technician/per month
Professional
$75
per technician/per month
Business Plus
$120
per technician/per month
Enterprise
$180
per technician/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Primavera UnifierUpKeep Maintenance Management
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Primavera UnifierUpKeep Maintenance Management
Considered Both Products
Primavera Unifier
Chose Primavera Unifier
The cost sheet & cost management feature is best for tracking cost-related information. We can store document tracking Good by integrating with multiple external tools.
Chose Primavera Unifier
It is more user friendly , easy in cost management, good for integrating with multiple tools as data sources
Chose Primavera Unifier
Prolog has been around almost as long as Primavera has. Prolog now belongs under the Trimble brand. The difference is that the Primavera product continues to improve and introduces features that benefit the Construction/Engineering community. At one point, Prolog had a very …
Chose Primavera Unifier
Have only used Unifier so I can't speak to the features of other software.
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We liked the Hippo CMMS for the mapping feature - you can do an overlay of the building plan and markup the locations - but the barcode feature was not there at the time we reviewed, so there was some automation lost there. UpKeep had the barcode - but lacked the mapping. We …
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Previously had MEX, though had not implemented it throughout the business. It was way too difficult for the techs to use on the fly and was just a nightmare to implement. UpKeep, on the other hand, is a walk in the park.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
I selected UpKeep because of the glowing reviews I found online.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
UpKeep has many superior functions over more traditional, open-source type maintenance management programs. The biggest advantage is the availability of mobile apps. The software is much more intuitive as well.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
It's been about 5 1/2 years since I used Astea, but it was cumbersome and poorly designed back then. I used it as a basis for what I didn't want to inflict on my fellow workers.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Upkeep is a faster cleaner system than a maintenance connection with a great mobile option for my technicians. The user interface for reports and PM creation is fast and easy. It has more functionality than eMaint and works very well for all the things we needed a CMMS to do in …
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We have used Fixx, which is a great product but having separate assets is what changed the game for us.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Cleaner UI
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Superior product, easier to use and navigate. More responsive customer service, better pricing.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We use UpKeep because of the price and ease of use. They have knowledgable staff that knows how to get this program started on time and have people directed to achieve start-up.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Maintenance Connection had issues with reminders and they couldn't get them fixed for me, so I went with UpKeep.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
It may be a larger challenge for the internal office workers to utilize upkeep. Often times when you're hiring property managers, maintainers, they may not be orientated towards technology. We can learn how to utilize something new if it presents a larger challenge. We want our …
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We researched numerous other programs and all of them fell short in one way or another. Ideally, we would like to integrate our accounting processes with UpKeep, but we aren't there yet as our present accounting software is not compatible.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Hippo wasn't as simple, and it was far more expensive.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
I feel that UpKeep is a superior program. It has more features and is more user-friendly.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We were originally looking towards "Dynaway" as it is easily integrated into the AX platform. I was able to run a trial version and found that it is far more detailed and requires training to use. UpKeep is very user-friendly and intuitive. It allows users of almost any skill …
Best Alternatives
Primavera UnifierUpKeep Maintenance Management
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Accruent Lucernex
Accruent Lucernex
Score 7.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Primavera UnifierUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Primavera UnifierUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Primavera Unifier is well suited as a document management system for managing construction projects from all phases of the project (design through construction). Linking the application to other Oracle products like Oracle Financials is very straight forward and easy. Again, you build the framework of what you want the application to use. Not using Procurement, no problem, just throw it off. You have control of want you want and don't want. You are not forced to used everything.
Read full review
Very appropriate within our business since It is so easy to use and implement. The software gives the techs more accountability and ownership of jobs, along with the ability to create re-occurring work orders for inspections and checks. I now get accurate data to report against on a weekly basis, and get KPI's to set goals for our team.
Read full review
Pros
  • Resource management
  • Cost management
  • Document management
  • Facilities management
  • Cash flow
Read full review
  • The app is very simple to use - Very user-friendly for the user, and very easy to set up.
  • The ability to upload photos, take photos and then assign the work order ticket to a vendor is great.
  • The ability to upload bids, quotes, and issues then create a PDF file that can be exported to vendors, employees, or third parties is great.
Read full review
Cons
  • Cash flow.
  • Cost sheet.
  • Standard & library.
  • UI
Read full review
  • Periodic maintenance needs are still a little tricky keeping in the system without flooding the user with too many work orders.
  • It does not immediately update all the time. For example, closing out work orders and the number of total work orders stays the same until it’s rebooted.
  • Search functions need improving.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We love how organized it has made our processes.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I think the platform is user-friendly but there have been some issues that colleagues have been complaining about. For example, the program tends to run slow from time to time. Reporting could be better. We could use more fields for categories under parts and assets.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
I cannot say enough great things about their customer service. From the start of the purchase, Upkeep was extremely helpful and informative. They have been ongoingly keeping us informed and available to answer any of our questions as they arise. They ongoing learning portal is also helpful when new features and changes happen with the interface.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Everything went as planned.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
The cost sheet & cost management feature is best for tracking cost-related information. We can store document tracking Good by integrating with multiple external tools.
Read full review
We liked the Hippo CMMS for the mapping feature - you can do an overlay of the building plan and markup the locations - but the barcode feature was not there at the time we reviewed, so there was some automation lost there. UpKeep had the barcode - but lacked the mapping. We preferred the barcode feature. Also - the mobile app for UpKeep was much more mature, and they've since added the sensors (beta) which I don't believe Hippo has yet.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Has provided efficiency to existing processes.
  • Cost savings due to cloud implementation.
  • Allows growth within the system based on need.
Read full review
  • It's a bit too soon to speak of ROI, but being able to track issues over multiple service calls has proven to be useful, especially when it comes to holding workers accountable for their use of the machines.
  • It's easy to use for those who use it.
  • It's no harder to submit issues than it is to send an email. If you can send an email, you can submit an issue.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Primavera Unifier Screenshots

Screenshot of Cash Flow ManagementScreenshot of Project Cost ControlScreenshot of Contract ManagementScreenshot of Earned Value ManagementScreenshot of Fund ManagementScreenshot of Maintenance Management

UpKeep Maintenance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Product Suite