TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

UpKeep Maintenance Management

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    UpKeep Maintenance Management

    Score7 out of 10
    Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
    UpKeep allows users to snap a picture of a broken piece of equipment, create a work order, and schedule it for repair - all from a mobile device. UpKeep is designed for facility, property, restaurant, and manufacturing managers looking to improve communication by enabling real-time status updates for their teams. The vendor says it is a modern, intuitive, and customizable CMMS that is proven to expedite workflow processes. Capabilities include: -Add co-workers and easily assign work…

    $40

    per technician/per month

    Pricing
    UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Editions & Modules
    Starter
    $40
    per technician/per month
    Professional
    $75
    per technician/per month
    Business Plus
    $120
    per technician/per month
    Enterprise
    $180
    per technician/per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    Yes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    Yes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptional
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Considered Both Products
    UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    We liked the Hippo CMMS for the mapping feature - you can do an overlay of the building plan and markup the locations - but the barcode feature was not there at the time we reviewed, so there was some automation lost there. UpKeep had the barcode - but lacked the mapping. We …
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Trello is not user friendly.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Previously had MEX, though had not implemented it throughout the business. It was way too difficult for the techs to use on the fly and was just a nightmare to implement. UpKeep, on the other hand, is a walk in the park.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    I selected UpKeep because of the glowing reviews I found online.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    UpKeep Maintenance Management is the first software I have used.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    UpKeep has many superior functions over more traditional, open-source type maintenance management programs. The biggest advantage is the availability of mobile apps. The software is much more intuitive as well.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    It's been about 5 1/2 years since I used Astea, but it was cumbersome and poorly designed back then. I used it as a basis for what I didn't want to inflict on my fellow workers.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Upkeep is a faster cleaner system than a Maintenance Connection with a great mobile option for my technicians. The user interface for reports and PM creation is fast and easy. It has more functionality than eMaint and works very well for all the things we needed a CMMS to do in …
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    We have used Fixx, which is a great product but having separate assets is what changed the game for us.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    This was our first choice.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Cleaner UI
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Superior product, easier to use and navigate. More responsive customer service, better pricing.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    We use UpKeep because of the price and ease of use. They have knowledgable staff that knows how to get this program started on time and have people directed to achieve start-up.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Maintenance Connection had issues with reminders and they couldn't get them fixed for me, so I went with UpKeep.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    I haven't used any other product.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    It may be a larger challenge for the internal office workers to utilize upkeep. Often times when you're hiring property managers, maintainers, they may not be orientated towards technology. We can learn how to utilize something new if it presents a larger challenge. We want our …
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    We researched numerous other programs and all of them fell short in one way or another. Ideally, we would like to integrate our accounting processes with UpKeep, but we aren't there yet as our present accounting software is not compatible.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Hippo wasn't as simple, and it was far more expensive.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    I feel that UpKeep is a superior program. It has more features and is more user-friendly.
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    We were originally looking towards "Dynaway" as it is easily integrated into the AX platform. I was able to run a trial version and found that it is far more detailed and requires training to use. UpKeep is very user-friendly and intuitive. It allows users of almost any skill …
    Incentivized
    Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Highly recommend Upkeep Maintenance.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    User Ratings
    UpKeep Maintenance Management
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (25 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.2
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (23 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.1
    (1 ratings)