Oracle WebLogic Server vs. SAP Business Technology Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
SAP Business Technology Platform (SAP BTP) is the company's Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) offering, that brings together intelligent enterprise applications with database and data management, analytics, integration and extension capabilities into one platform for both cloud and hybrid environments, including hundreds of pre-built integrations for SAP and third-party applications.N/A
Pricing
Oracle WebLogic ServerSAP Business Technology Platform
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle WebLogic ServerSAP Business Technology Platform
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle WebLogic ServerSAP Business Technology Platform
Considered Both Products
Oracle WebLogic Server
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I have only used WebSphere for an evaluation period but I felt it was even harder to learn and it's cost was going to be bigger in the long run. Oracle WebLogic Server was more like the middle ground for what we needed at the time, both in terms of costs and learning curve.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
As mentioned earlier we didn't choose Oracle WebLogic Server, but received it as part of the application we bought. After using it for a few years we found it to be a stable product that has a bit of a learning curve compared to Microsoft IIS but is as stable and maybe even …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I wasn't involved in selecting the server we were using but in our team we've made some efforts to improve the local deployment process by trying some other Applicational servers too.
Apache Tomcat was a more lightweight solution for sure, and it coped well with our applications …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Application Server is very robust and has good features and stability. It is a very sought-after tool for deploying many kinds of applications.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like apache tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We have no option because we need it to use Oracle Forms, but we have used Jboss and tomcat in other projects and Weblogic is more stable.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat, Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform and IBM WebSphere Application Server on Cloud
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is a leading server side container. It is far superior than IBM's WebSphere application server, JBOSS or Tomcat server. The easiness of using Oracle's weblogic application server is much user friendly and also it has great support and user …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Application Server gains its reputation from the performance, easy of maintenance, to be compared with the competitor solutions. However, Weblogic is "all-in-on" solution, sometimes it is too fat for some business needs that only requires part of the full …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
The main competitor is Wildfly and Websphere. The choice it's all about the bundled cost regarding the chosen OS and Java vendor. All three are almost the same in terms of performance and features. An exceptional alternative from the OSS ecosystem is Payara. Payra has some …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is much more stable when compared to opensource application servers like Oracle GlassFish Server or Apache Tomcat. Coming to JBoss Enterprise Application Server, Oracle WebLogic Application Server has better support with most of the cloud …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
I used them in different contexts.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat requires a lot of out-of-the-box set-up that is difficult to work with, especially when it comes to production-ready configurations. The only advantage it has over Oracle WLS is that it's free, which is probably why many commercial server products are bundled with …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache tomcat is used by the group of developers in our organization but the major student ERP production systems do run on WebLogic due to its feature-rich nature and stability. Although the cost is considered a hindrance to its wider use.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We use Oracle Commerce Cloud as well.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Best support of JEE specifications.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We are using OBIEE application and when we install an application it is installed automatically with the application. We selected the WebLogic Server for better administration and maintenance of the application. It is very important for us to keep our production application up …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
WebSphere is another major contender and they have pitching and are more updated/streamlined. I still prefer WebLogic from an administrator standpoint. Support is much better and there are more options for finding answers to issues or new features.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Red Hat JBoss EAP is good and open source. We chose Oracle WebLogic because we are using Oracle products like Oracle Enterprise Manager and it's very easy to integrate WebLogic with it. Also, for our mission critical applications, we wanted an application server with great …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Compared to the alternatives, Weblogic is on the heavier side and requires more configuration to get it running. Instance startup time is also relatively long, but this could be due to the application size deployed on the server. Licensing cost for WebLogic would also be higher …
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
We tested Red Hat JBoss. Then we decided to use WebLogic because of support issues we had with the other.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Performance is better with heavy workloads.
Chose Oracle WebLogic Server
Apache Tomcat, Oracle GlassFish Server and Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
SAP Business Technology Platform
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Initially, SAP Business Technology Platform works hand in hand with S/4 HANA and the SAP product suite, but also can go and extra mile and integrate with other non-SAP products and services at hand. It's capable enough to understand the ERP use cases component and develop …
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Datasphere, SAP BPC (Business Planning and Consolidation) and SAP Integration Suite
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Business Network
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Sales Force Optimization
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Informatica Cloud Data Integration
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
OpenText Core Capture
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Business Technology Platform won us over mainly due to the need for integrating back to the S4 back end. The ease of connecting via SAP cloud connector were the go to reason. Once we get to understand the functions of the service and the potential future, it helps to …
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Cloud Commerce Pro
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Microsoft Power Automate
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
In my opinion, Google Cloud Platform is more low level and a generic building-block whereas SAP Business Technology Platform is optimized for SAP use cases or where one connected system is SAP
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Enable Now
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Build
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
I selected SAP Business Technology Platform because it seamlessly integrates ERP and business applications, providing a clear and unified environment for data management and analytics.
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Unlike other platforms, SAP BTP offers native integration with SAP systems, ensuring smooth data flow and process automation.
End to end business process management -SAP business process automation its easier to create and optimize workflows.
Comprehensive AI & Analytics: SAP …
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Sales Performance Management solutions from SAP SuccessFactors
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP HANA Cloud
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP Business Technology Platform provides the services in a kind of ready-to-use. There is no requirement to first configure a whole environment. It makes it easy to just use the services and create new solutions on top of that.
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
SAP S/4HANA Cloud, SAP Ariba and SuccessCOACHING
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
Workday Financial Management
Chose SAP Business Technology Platform
it seems to meet all our requirements
Features
Oracle WebLogic ServerSAP Business Technology Platform
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
Ratings
2% above category average
SAP Business Technology Platform
-
Ratings
IDE support6.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Administration and management7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application server performance8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Installation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform-as-a-Service
Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
SAP Business Technology Platform
7.4
Ratings
8% below category average
Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Scalability00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Platform management overhead00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Platform access control00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Services-enabled integration00 Ratings7.80 Ratings
Development environment creation00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
Development environment replication00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Issue recovery00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings7.30 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle WebLogic ServerSAP Business Technology Platform
Small Businesses
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.2 out of 10
Red Hat OpenShift
Red Hat OpenShift
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Oracle WebLogic ServerSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
7.5
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.6
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(0 ratings)
7.5
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Oracle WebLogic ServerSAP Business Technology Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
I see Oracle WebLogic Application Server being appropriate when an application needs several different data sources and messaging providers configured and accessible, with a configured level of control of resources (connection pools) and timeouts. It is also advisable to create distributed resources that you can configure as always active to provide more processing power, or as failover for situations of availability in case of disaster recovery, for example. An application where the number of required resources configured is very small and almost non-changeable, and no scalability is required, some other options exist in the market with less cost.
Read full review
SAP Business Technology Platform offers to run the cloud application without worries about availability and accessibility. This is helping us to enable the services that are really suited for us. For example, We have Cloud Identity Services that offer the capability to manage identity directory and also Identity provisioning functionality. Both functionalities helped us to manage the SSO and also enabled the auto-provisioning.
Read full review
Pros
  • I love that the weblogic dashboard allows you to manage applications and see the status of each application.
  • Oracle WebLogic Application Server simplifies usage periods in the development and production of business applications.
  • Oracle WebLogic Server allows me to define various aspects of data source entry, including creating a specific multiple connection to facilitate data entry.
  • Performance and administration are highlighted in weblogic.
Read full review
  • Authentication options - In the past, we needed to really leverage our own solutions for MFA and other security measures, but now, out-of-the-box these options are really good and readily available.
  • Ease of use - the interface has been adjusted to be really easy on the eyes but also simpler, less convoluted, and really well thought out.
  • Modernized SAP experience - compared to the old stuff, SAP is really modernizing all of the experiences. The new house style is rejuvenated, and the company is really becoming more likable compared to 10 years ago!
  • SAP Discovery and Missions are a real treat to see what the upcoming costs are!
Read full review
Cons
  • The Admin UI should be further simplified, the UI design was not too user-friendly— too many options and clicks required, difficult for the new beginners to figure out what they are looking for.
  • The admin server becomes the single failure point, although Oracle suggested some workarounds by setting VIP and VHost, it was not quite easy and straight forward.
  • Domain replication is hard, requiring a lot of knowledge and scripts efforts.
  • Admin will hang if the node manager communication encounters some issues for one or some nodes in the domain/cluster.
  • Not able to kill/terminate the stuck thread, the only way is to restart the managed server (JVM)
  • License cost is too high, for small businesses.
Read full review
  • The almost mandatory use of HANA services to run CAP applications. It would be best to provide extensive support for other databases.
  • The subspace landing page/cockpit is not so user friendly. Provides a lot of information and usually is hard to find where things are.
  • Downtimes should be shorter.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Seamless integration with external system and dashboard to monitor the data flow and analysis are very essential for the business. The way the product is designed and modelled lead to minimum business disruptions. Adopting to the new and modern technology was easy. Keeping the central system as clean and adopting project bases development are advantages.
Read full review
Usability
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Overall, I feel it is build toward as an SAP centric platform. Which is very proper direction for SAP as it is their competitive advantage. However, as a customer, I like to see the cost of the services to come down with the advance of underlay hardware capabilities. Licensing model can be streamlined for easier budgeting and consumption.
Read full review
Performance
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
I give it 9/10 because its customer support team is responsive and knowledgeable, providing clear guidance on complex issues. We contacted them several times; I want to give one example. When we had a problem with third-party integration, we reached out to them about the issue, and they provided a tailored solution for this.
Read full review
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Training material in Developers Community or from Learning hub are really good... also most of the time we route through Discovery center... so materials provided by SAP is really good.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
1. Sometimes the licensing doesn’t make sense, e.g., Difficult to understand the license for ABAP cloud runtime. 2. When SAP Business Technology Platform workflow cost is very high but process automation which offers more features has less cost.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
I wasn't involved in selecting the server we were using but in our team we've made some efforts to improve the local deployment process by trying some other Applicational servers too. Apache Tomcat was a more lightweight solution for sure, and it coped well with our applications needs, configuration and performance wise. Despite that, since we didn't got clearance to change that into our local servers, we kept using Weblogic to guarantee compliance between the testing environments and production.
Read full review
SAP Business Technology Platform is easily connectable using standard solutions to the onpremise backend SAP systems. Services can be linked with each other and with SAP systems in a managed and secure way, while with the other products getting the data, access and networking done is cumbersome. Also we can make sure to have all cloud environments in the same region using the multi cloud approach wich reduces latency problems.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It made it easy to handle over a 100 of deployments across multiple nodes every quarter.
  • It was easy to scale up our application to 36 nodes as the volume of transactions increased over the years.
  • Helped us achieve 99.999 availability for our users.
Read full review
  • Spending time to develop the application idea and visualize first before jumping to SAP Business Technology Platform and initiate development
  • Take the time to test and validate architecture and data flows for the potential application or process to be developed on SAP Business Technology Platform
  • Conduct regular assessment of usability, effectiveness of process turnover
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Business Technology Platform Screenshots

Screenshot of SAP Build Process Automation, an SAP BTP service