Adobe Workfront vs. Planview AdaptiveWork

Adobe Workfront

647 Reviews and Ratings

Planview AdaptiveWork

118 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Adobe Workfront	Score7.7 out of 10	N/A	Adobe Workfront, acquired by Adobe in late 2020, is a web-based project-management tool. It is designed for both IT and marketing teams, but can be implemented for any kind of project. Workfront offers all the features standard to project management platforms, as well as resource allocation, automation, and agile workflow.	N/A
Planview AdaptiveWork	Score7.4 out of 10	N/A	Planview AdaptiveWork is a web-based collaborative work management software. Planview AdaptiveWork enables users to connect employees and partners and create documents, reports and specialized workflow automation. Planview AdaptiveWork is designed to work across multiple teams to enable cross-company task, project, and resource management.	N/A

Pricing

Adobe Workfront

Planview AdaptiveWork

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Adobe Workfront	Planview AdaptiveWork
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	Yes

Optional

Optional

—

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Adobe Workfront	Planview AdaptiveWork
Considered Both Products	Adobe Erik Viager Sr. Strategic Development Manager, B2D in Sales at Intouch Group (Marketing and Advertising, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Adobe Workfront It's been a while since I've used another time and resource management platform, but I would say that Adobe Workfront takes the cake. Its newly refreshed user interface is simple to navigate, whereas other platforms can be quite confusing when "drilling down" on a project. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Adobe Workfront Adobe is very intuitive in its workflow automation and creation of the task workflows that can be used as templates for employees. That is harder to create in Teams unless there is [the] integration of another Microsoft product and more time spent on it by an IT professional. … Incentivized Helpful? Stephen Jonas Senior Manager Digital Communications Channels at HMSA (Insurance, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Adobe Workfront Workfront has better integration into the tools we use, like Adobe Creative Suite, Outlook, Salesforce, and our CMS and DAM. We needed a solution that could work well with our MarCOMM Stack and didn't need a whole lot of support. Although we're a small shop (license-wise) … Incentivized Helpful? Aileen Taylor Marketing Communications Manager in Marketing at Cell Signaling Technology (Pharmaceuticals, 201-500 employees) Chose Adobe Workfront JIRA and Clarizen were too complicated and did not offer an integrated document review and proofing system. Microsoft Project did not handle multiple small projects and resource allocation as well. Smartsheet was too limited for large teams and required too much manual work. Incentivized Helpful? Jen Franz Marketing Project Coordinator in Marketing at SAE International (Non-Profit Organization Management, 201-500 employees) Chose Adobe Workfront Workfront was hands down our choice. It seemed to have the most streamlined processes and capabilities. Incentivized Helpful? Andrés Pérez Gómez Gerente de Tecnología - CTO in Information Technology at El Colombiano (Media Production, 501-1000 employees) Chose Adobe Workfront Multilingual support, all work in the same place! Document repository. The decisition on selecting the tool was very easy knowing we are located in a remote country. Automate workflow processes across the enterprise, ease of use. Prioritize requests, keep people on the same … Incentivized Helpful? Augusta Coman Programme Manager, Group IT in Information Technology at Emerson Automation Solutions (Oil & Energy, 10,001+ employees) Chose Adobe Workfront We selected in the end Workfront over the other PM tools evaluated due to ease of use for the levels of our users, capacity planning options and good value for the price it has. Also now that is has support and online training included in the price it an easy way to manage the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Adobe Workfront Better overall functionality. More expensive, but worth it. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Adobe Workfront Workfront beats them all hands down. Asana was too simplistic for our needs, Wrike was very clunky and didn't handle the finances very well. Clarizen didn't have document approvals and collaboration that we needed. Workfront was a great mix of ease of use, complexity, and … Incentivized Helpful? Tim Wendland Director of IT Strategic Development in Information Technology at OPIS (Oil & Energy, 201-500 employees) Chose Adobe Workfront The team collaboration and communication tools won over our users! Incentivized Helpful? Aman Singh Sr. Business Analyst in Professional Services at NetApp (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose Adobe Workfront Clarizen is another great option and offer a much more flexible solution. Helpful? Verified User Chose Adobe Workfront Clarizen seemed to provide roughly the same product. They quoted a bit more expensive, and not many improvements. The implementation cost was not worth it. AtTask also did a better job at Gantt Charts for each project rather than just 1 for all projects in Clarizen, which was … Helpful?	Planview Chris Carpenter Lead Systems Analyst in Information Technology at Shaw Industries Group, Inc. (Information Technology and Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose Planview AdaptiveWork Clarizen's ease of use, ease of setup, out-of-the-box delivery, project management, and time management were the factors for choosing Clarizen. All were good products but we are happy to have selected Clarizen. Incentivized Helpful? Shel Hankley Information Systems Analyst, IT Project Manager and Clarizen Administrator in Information Technology at Southern States Cooperative (Retail, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Planview AdaptiveWork AtTask, EPM Live, CorasWorks There were many different reasons why we chose Clarizen but ease of use, functionality and price and adaptability were our top reasons. Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

Adobe Workfront

Planview AdaptiveWork

Comparison of Project Management features of Adobe Workfront and Planview AdaptiveWork
Feature	Adobe Workfront 8.6 304 Ratings	Planview AdaptiveWork - Ratings
Task Management	10.0303 Ratings	00 Ratings
Resource Management	9.0275 Ratings	00 Ratings
Gantt Charts	9.0243 Ratings	00 Ratings
Scheduling	8.0271 Ratings	00 Ratings
Workflow Automation	8.0273 Ratings	00 Ratings
Team Collaboration	8.0293 Ratings	00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology	8.0186 Ratings	00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology	6.5199 Ratings	00 Ratings
Document Management	6.8275 Ratings	00 Ratings
Email integration	10.0231 Ratings	00 Ratings
Mobile Access	8.0234 Ratings	00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking	10.0220 Ratings	00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management	9.0211 Ratings	00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management	10.0189 Ratings	00 Ratings

Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Adobe Workfront and Planview AdaptiveWork
Feature	Adobe Workfront 6.0 173 Ratings	Planview AdaptiveWork - Ratings
Quotes/estimates	5.181 Ratings	00 Ratings
Invoicing	6.171 Ratings	00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting	6.4171 Ratings	00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software	6.462 Ratings	00 Ratings

User Ratings
	Adobe Workfront	Planview AdaptiveWork
Likelihood to Recommend	8.9 (355 ratings)	7.4 (78 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.0 (60 ratings)	7.5 (26 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (18 ratings)	7.3 (5 ratings)
Availability	9.1 (9 ratings)	8.2 (3 ratings)
Performance	9.1 (4 ratings)	9.1 (5 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (12 ratings)	9.1 (7 ratings)
In-Person Training	5.0 (1 ratings)	8.2 (2 ratings)
Online Training	8.9 (4 ratings)	5.4 (5 ratings)
Implementation Rating	8.3 (10 ratings)	8.2 (4 ratings)
Configurability	5.0 (1 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model	10.0 (1 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Ease of integration	1.0 (1 ratings)	8.2 (1 ratings)
Product Scalability	8.2 (3 ratings)	- (0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	1.0 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	1.0 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)