TrustRadius

SmarteQM vs. Tricentis qTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
SmarteQM
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
SmarteQM is a test management offering from Austin-based SmarteSoft.N/A
Tricentis qTest
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.N/A
Pricing
SmarteQMTricentis qTest
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
SmarteQMTricentis qTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
SmarteQMTricentis qTest
Considered Both Products
SmarteQM

No answer on this topic

Tricentis qTest
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
qTest was in general easier to use and more intuitive in its layout
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
I have used HP AlM, Redmine , ADO in past and I loved qTest for its ability to integrate with CI tool , automation frameworks and Jira.
Ketal Parikh | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ketal Parikh
Principal Consultant
Chose Tricentis qTest
As I am not the actual decision maker of which tool to purchase. I have always liked the Tricentis qTest tool. Decision has been made by the top management, The tool has proven is value and for the Same reason it is still being used.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
Open option for automation testing & easy to set up.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
looking at the positive features like 3rd party integration, the Tricentis qTest stacks up along with providing the custom build and event driven workflows with open-source solutions (Azure, DevOps, Teams etc). Manages and schedule automated testing along with creating report …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
  • Value for money
  • Best in class
  • All the feature which other tool are having
Mahathee Dandibhotla | TrustRadius Reviewer
Mahathee Dandibhotla
Project Lead Quality
Chose Tricentis qTest
Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows.
Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements.
Supports robust requirements traceability, …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
Tricentis is easy to use and user friendly. Less time consuming with lot of good utilities. And for better test management. qTest also stacks up better than the above tools due to its efficiency, test case interface and test execution interface. Excellent comments area and …
Nikhil Puniyani | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nikhil Puniyani
Senior Software Engineer In Test
Chose Tricentis qTest
- It was not our decision to use qTest as a tool, as this was a management decision.
- Since I have used many Test Management Tools I can compare for e.g
The Reporting and Statistics in qTest is very impressive.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qtest is well suited as it serves the purpose for both quality assurance and business management. It is very simple for non technical users to write test cases in free hand and they don’t have to bother about traceability as it is automatically handled by this …
Chose Tricentis qTest
I have worked on JIRA, but i found it more difficult interface to handle. It was not user friendly. The defect management was also not impressive. qTest experience actually helped me to take decision while evaluating.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
I'm not the decision maker, so I can't provide objective comparison criteria, but I can say that Tricentis QTest is a reliable tool for Test Management.
EH
Ed Hein
Sr. Manager, Digital Product Excellence
Chose Tricentis qTest
Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
Still evaluating. TestRail seems to be a far better solution but we need to solve migration issues.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
Tricentis qTest provides a neater package, with easier test execution and better integration with our other tools.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
The main tool we compared to Tricentis qTest Explorer was the "Steps Recorder" that comes with Windows. We selected Tricentis qTest Explorer because, at least at the time, Steps Recorder would sometimes skip recording arbitrary steps, which didn't meet our needs.
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
Didn’t have the same ease of use for us and didn’t integrate as well into our test process.
Nick Larsen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nick Larsen
Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support
Chose Tricentis qTest
None of our previous tools we listed in the available drop-down options. We had previously used Spira Test and Xray as our test repositories. We are currently evaluating Test Rail, Zephyr, PractiTest, and others.

From an organizational perspective, qTest is better than Xray as …
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Tricentis qTest
We felt like for the feature set and due to the fact it was mid-range on the cost, it was a good choice. It also has some other plugins which we plan to utilize at some point like Tosca.
Carla Borges | TrustRadius Reviewer
Carla Borges
Consultor Tecnico - Java Developer
Chose Tricentis qTest
We selected QASymphony because even though all the testing software are Agile compatible test management tools that offer complete coverage of the whole process of quality control: requirements, testing and management of test cases, problem management and reports. It offers …
Features
SmarteQMTricentis qTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
SmarteQM
-
Ratings
Tricentis qTest
7.5
Ratings
7% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
Best Alternatives
SmarteQMTricentis qTest
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
SmarteQMTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
SmarteQMTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
No answers on this topic
Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Pros
No answers on this topic
  • As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand.
  • It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location
  • The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Cons
No answers on this topic
  • Make it easier to delete old users from the licensing list.
  • It is difficult to trace the history of a test when going between projects.
  • Allow an admin to easily group tests according to their pass/fail/incomplete status so that they can be followed up on.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
Nick Larsen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nick Larsen
Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
Nick Larsen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nick Larsen
Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
Nick Larsen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Nick Larsen
Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Return on Investment
No answers on this topic
  • Test case and requirements analysis becomes easier when you will get all test management needs in one place.
  • connecting ADO,QTEST,TOSCA together helps to monitor test results and test quality on the GO
  • Defect life-cycle is easier to maintain so as to ensuring a defect free system.
KUMAR PRANAY PATRA | TrustRadius Reviewer
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tricentis qTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards