Spryker Cloud Commerce OS vs. Yo!Kart

Spryker is very well suited (B2C and/or B2B) for big companies with complex and individual business models or also if your company needs a certain level of customization. Very good fit, if you need a scalable system. It is rather not the perfect fit for small companies or companies with very basic E-Commerce needs.

While
searching for the most reliable and promising multi-vendor ecommerce solution,
I came across Yo!Kart from Fatbit Technologies. Before making any
purchase decision I needed a few clarification on their packages and hence I
took contact with one of their sales team member, Ms Kulwinder Kaur. She was
extremely helpful in clarifying most of the doubts I had and she also went
beyond by connecting me with Mr Kapil Grover (VP – Partnership and Alliances)
who made sure all my queries were answered. After a few conversations with
them, I knew my project would be in good hands and hence decided to move
forward with the purchase. My project was handed over to Mr. Abhishek (Project
Manager) and I am so grateful that he was the one assigned for it. Mr. Abhishek
is an extremely dedicated individual and I have developed a very good
professional relationship with him throughout my time working with Fatbit. He ensured all my issues were solved
immediately by maintaining a professional communication throughout. I am
extremely thankfull to him for all determination and extra effort he put in to
ensure my platform was top-notch. He definitely deserves to be promoted for all
the hard work he puts in!

• Extendable - you can extend the core functionalities to every business need.
• Scalable - the technical implementation supports a highly scalable system approach.
• Adjustable - besides implementing new functionalities the core functionalities can be adjusted to the business needs.
• Up-to-date - compared to other E-Business solutions, the technological foundation of Spryker is growing, with the technological development and implementations [which] are kept up-to-date with quarterly releases.

Incentivized

• It has a very simple to use user interface
• They provide us many revenew options, such as PPS and more.
• The customer service is magnificent!

• The documentation and developer bootcamp is sometimes out-of-date.
• Open code, not open source, all bugs need to be submitted to an internal system without accepting patches from communities.
• Steep learning curve.
• The bridges at the core level sometimes cause difficulties in project-level implementation.

• Providing individual sellers more access to their customer's contact information.
• Update their documentation to reflect recent upgrades.
• better support for Third Party Integrations.

Spryker's usability depends a lot on custom development. Therefore, I would like not to consider usability as something that comes with Spryker Cloud Commerce OS. Spryker Cloud Commerce OS; however, brings all the tools needed to design a solution with great usability.

Support suffered from Spryker Cloud Commerce OS's rapid growth. Contacts, department heads, and support systems changed frequently. Support processes as well as documentation are rather poor. One notices that they are putting more effort into the customers recently, but in the course of growth, there is still a lack of focus here. As a customer, I would like to see growth at a slower pace and a phase of stabilization.

Incentivized

If you compare Spryker with commerce solutions on the market, you will notice that the focus is not on the front end. Spryker assumes that the store is only one of many possible channels through which customers order today and in the future. To understand the differences, one must therefore take a look at Spryker's architecture. This is divided into the Spryker [Cloud] Commerce OS (the backend with all process-related components), the front-end modules for B2C and B2B, as well as the integration modules (middleware) and interfaces (Glue API).

We chose Yo!Kart over CS-Kart because Yo!Kart is an all-in-one package. We do not have a dedicated software development team that would be needed for customizing CS-Kart. We chose Yo!Kart over Shuup because Shuup does not support a multivendor market that offers both physical and digital download products at the same time.

• Time-To-Market: With Spryker you can run MVPs in less time and you can test new functionality with certain groups of users.
• Due to its speed it is very likely to have reoccurring customer because of a very good customer experience.
• With Spryker our customers increased their revenue especially in times of Corona where orders doubled and Spryker was able to cope with the load with no substantial increase in server power.

Incentivized

• It has allowed our vision for a resource marketplace to become a reality.
• We are below our budget estimate for the project development.
• A negative impact has been the long development process.