Test Evolve vs. Tricentis qTest

Test Evolve

Test Evolve

1 Reviews and Ratings

Tricentis qTest

Tricentis qTest

54 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Test Evolve	Score 10.0 out of 10	N/A	Test Evolve is an automated testing tool used to ensure optimal quality and performance of software products. It helps software development teams to streamline the testing process and achieve faster release cycles. Test Evolve's Key Features: Test Automation: Test Evolve automates functional, regression, and load testing, freeing up developers' time and resources. Cross-Browser and Platform Testing: Test Evolve helps to ensure that software works seamlessly on…	N/A
Tricentis qTest	Score 8.9 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.	N/A

Pricing

Test Evolve

Tricentis qTest

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Test Evolve	Tricentis qTest
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Optional

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Test Evolve	Tricentis qTest
Considered Both Products	Test Evolve No answer on this topic	Tricentis qTest Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest qTest was in general easier to use and more intuitive in its layout Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest I have used HP AlM, Redmine , ADO in past and I loved qTest for its ability to integrate with CI tool , automation frameworks and Jira. Incentivized Helpful? Ketal Parikh Principal Consultant Chose Tricentis qTest As I am not the actual decision maker of which tool to purchase. I have always liked the Tricentis qTest tool. Decision has been made by the top management, The tool has proven is value and for the Same reason it is still being used. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Open option for automation testing & easy to set up. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest looking at the positive features like 3rd party integration, the Tricentis qTest stacks up along with providing the custom build and event driven workflows with open-source solutions (Azure, DevOps, Teams etc). Manages and schedule automated testing along with creating report … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Value for money Best in class All the feature which other tool are having Incentivized Helpful? Mahathee Dandibhotla Project Lead Quality Chose Tricentis qTest Extensive integration options with various third-party tools, enabling seamless integration into existing workflows. Allows for flexibility and customization of workflows, fields, and permissions to adapt to unique testing requirements. Supports robust requirements traceability, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest TestRail Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis is easy to use and user friendly. Less time consuming with lot of good utilities. And for better test management. qTest also stacks up better than the above tools due to its efficiency, test case interface and test execution interface. Excellent comments area and … Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Senior Software Engineer In Test Chose Tricentis qTest - It was not our decision to use qTest as a tool, as this was a management decision. - Since I have used many Test Management Tools I can compare for e.g The Reporting and Statistics in qTest is very impressive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qtest is well suited as it serves the purpose for both quality assurance and business management. It is very simple for non technical users to write test cases in free hand and they don’t have to bother about traceability as it is automatically handled by this … Incentivized Helpful? KUMAR PRANAY PATRA QA ENGINEER Chose Tricentis qTest I have worked on JIRA, but i found it more difficult interface to handle. It was not user friendly. The defect management was also not impressive. qTest experience actually helped me to take decision while evaluating. Incentivized Helpful? SS Suresh Somisetty Manager of Engineering Chose Tricentis qTest Micro Focus ALM / Quality Center and TestRail Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest I'm not the decision maker, so I can't provide objective comparison criteria, but I can say that Tricentis QTest is a reliable tool for Test Management. Incentivized Helpful? EH Ed Hein Sr. Manager, Digital Product Excellence Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Still evaluating. TestRail seems to be a far better solution but we need to solve migration issues. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qTest provides a neater package, with easier test execution and better integration with our other tools. Incentivized Helpful? AT Adrian Tang Senior Manager, Software Quality Assurance Chose Tricentis qTest Prior to qTest, the teams were using TestLink. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest The main tool we compared to Tricentis qTest Explorer was the "Steps Recorder" that comes with Windows. We selected Tricentis qTest Explorer because, at least at the time, Steps Recorder would sometimes skip recording arbitrary steps, which didn't meet our needs. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Didn’t have the same ease of use for us and didn’t integrate as well into our test process. Incentivized Helpful? Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Chose Tricentis qTest None of our previous tools we listed in the available drop-down options. We had previously used Spira Test and Xray as our test repositories. We are currently evaluating Test Rail, Zephyr, PractiTest, and others. From an organizational perspective, qTest is better than Xray as … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest Zephyr Enterprise Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Tricentis qTest We felt like for the feature set and due to the fact it was mid-range on the cost, it was a good choice. It also has some other plugins which we plan to utilize at some point like Tosca. Incentivized Helpful? Carla Borges Consultor Tecnico - Java Developer Chose Tricentis qTest We selected QASymphony because even though all the testing software are Agile compatible test management tools that offer complete coverage of the whole process of quality control: requirements, testing and management of test cases, problem management and reports. It offers … Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Test Evolve

Tricentis qTest

Test Management

Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
	Test Evolve - Ratings	Tricentis qTest 7.5 Ratings 7% below category average
Centralized test management	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules	00 Ratings	7.20 Ratings
Map tests to user stories	00 Ratings	7.60 Ratings
Test execution reporting	00 Ratings	7.40 Ratings
Defect management	00 Ratings	7.90 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Test Evolve	Tricentis qTest
Small Businesses	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10	BrowserStack Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	ReadyAPI Score 7.0 out of 10	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises	ignio AIOps Score 8.1 out of 10	OpenText ALM/Quality Center Score 8.0 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Test Evolve	Tricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.1 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	6.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	1.0 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	5.0 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Test Evolve	Tricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend	No answers on this topic	Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	No answers on this topic	As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand. It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	No answers on this topic	Make it easier to delete old users from the licensing list. It is difficult to trace the history of a test when going between projects. Allow an admin to easily group tests according to their pass/fail/incomplete status so that they can be followed up on. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	No answers on this topic	This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon). Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	No answers on this topic	qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Support Rating	No answers on this topic	The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Implementation Rating	No answers on this topic	Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better Incentivized Nick Larsen Quality Assurance Manager - Application Development & Support Read full review
Alternatives Considered	No answers on this topic	All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	No answers on this topic	Test case and requirements analysis becomes easier when you will get all test management needs in one place. connecting ADO,QTEST,TOSCA together helps to monitor test results and test quality on the GO Defect life-cycle is easier to maintain so as to ensuring a defect free system. Incentivized KUMAR PRANAY PATRA QA ENGINEER Read full review
ScreenShots	Test Evolve Screenshots	Tricentis qTest Screenshots