| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 LoadRunner Professional | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | A solution simplifies performance load testing for colocated teams. With project-based capabilities, so teams can quickly identify abnormal application behavior. | N/A |
 Tricentis NeoLoad | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | Tricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021. | $20,000 per year with 300 virtual users |
| LoadRunner Professional | Tricentis NeoLoad | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| LoadRunner Professional | Tricentis NeoLoad | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose LoadRunner Professional Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose LoadRunner Professional Most of the above tools are pretty popular in the industry. These are tools that are way cheaper compared to the industry giant LoadRunner. Yet these tools have their own limitations and drawbacks. In BlazeMeter the user load cannot be modified during the test run. JMeter and Bl… Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Because of noted as below points we leaning towards Tricentis NeoLoad over other tools: Easy to use, faster test design, script customization, real time test monitoring, IP spoofing, mobile testing, scalability, easy to setup and maintain, record and playback capability, … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Tricentis NeoLoad Tricentis NeoLoad stacks up against them as it is generally used where there are many websites or applications with large number of users. It is less expensive and provides some additional functionlities than the other tools available in the market. It ensures if any website … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Tricentis NeoLoad In small projects open source tools like JMeter are the hardest competitors because money is a reliable metric. But NeoLoad offers a value in case of reporting and scalability. The standard reports are very comprehensive and easy to understand for stakeholders. It takes much … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Tricentis NeoLoad NeolLoad is a less expensive alternative to HP LoadRunner that is also easier to learn and use. NeoLoad supports the same web-based protocols as HP LoadRunner, and, in addition, provides better support for testing mobile applications. In my organization, NeoLoad's main … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| LoadRunner Professional | Tricentis NeoLoad | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Load Testing |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| LoadRunner Professional | Tricentis NeoLoad | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 7.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 7.3 |
| Usability | - | 7.3 |
| Support Rating | 3.0 | 3.6 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 6.4 |
