TestRail vs. Tricentis qTest

TestRail

26 Reviews and Ratings

Tricentis qTest

54 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
TestRail	Score6.7 out of 10	N/A	TestRail by Gurock, an IDERA company, is presented as a complete web-based test case management solution to manage, track, and organize your software testing efforts.	$35 per month billed annually
Tricentis qTest	Score9 out of 10	N/A	Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.	$1,200 per year per user

Pricing

TestRail

Tricentis qTest

Professional Cloud: $35
per month billed annually per user
Professional Cloud: $38
per month per user
Enterprise Cloud: $71
per month billed annually per user

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
TestRail	Tricentis qTest
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

No setup fee

Optional

—

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	TestRail	Tricentis qTest
Considered Both Products	IDERA (an Idera, Inc. company) Binoy Shah Software Integration Tester in Quality Assurance at Wirecard (Financial Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose TestRail TestRail definitely saves times. I work in a company that consists of several development teams, all of which have different processes. Some of the teams leverage test cases, some do not. I've noticed that the turn around time it takes for me to pick up a ticket, QA it, and … Incentivized Helpful?	Tricentis Verified User Chose Tricentis qTest All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis qTest We found that Tricentis qTest and TestRail have some similarities, but the main problem was that we needed to use an existing shared instance of TestRail, and we discovered that there was no easy way to prevent users of other projects from editing or even accidentally deleting … Incentivized Helpful? Nikhil Puniyani Senior Software Engineer In Test in Information Technology at EPAM Systems (Information Technology & Services, 10,001+ employees) Chose Tricentis qTest - It was not our decision to use qTest as a tool, as this was a management decision. - Since I have used many Test Management Tools I can compare for e.g The Reporting and Statistics in qTest is very impressive. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qtest is well suited as it serves the purpose for both quality assurance and business management. It is very simple for non technical users to write test cases in free hand and they don’t have to bother about traceability as it is automatically handled by this … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis qTest I'm not the decision maker, so I can't provide objective comparison criteria, but I can say that Tricentis QTest is a reliable tool for Test Management. Incentivized Helpful? Navaneeth T QA Manager in Quality Assurance at CONFLUENT (Information Technology & Services, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qTest takes a lead on centralised maintenance of all entities of STLC & also qTest takes a big leap when it comes to Proof of testing data capture thru "web explorer" & also it got advantage for its easy configuration against any project management tool i.e. JIRA etc. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Tricentis qTest Tricentis qTest ranks well among all test management platforms. For smaller teams with less activity or reporting requirements, qTest can be overkill. However, as organizations evolve and become more scrutinized or chaotic, qTest is one of, if not, the best option to ensure all … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

TestRail

Tricentis qTest

Comparison of Test Management features of TestRail and Tricentis qTest
Feature	TestRail 7.5 3 Ratings	Tricentis qTest 7.5 27 Ratings
Centralized test management	7.73 Ratings	7.426 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules	7.02 Ratings	7.223 Ratings
Map tests to user stories	7.73 Ratings	7.68 Ratings
Test execution reporting	8.13 Ratings	7.426 Ratings
Defect management	7.02 Ratings	7.922 Ratings

User Ratings
	TestRail	Tricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend	7.6 (3 ratings)	8.1 (29 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	6.0 (2 ratings)
Usability	7.0 (1 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	1.0 (1 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	5.0 (1 ratings)