Adobe Workfront vs. Wrike

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Workfront
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Adobe Workfront, acquired by Adobe in late 2020, is a web-based project-management tool. It is designed for both IT and marketing teams, but can be implemented for any kind of project. Workfront offers all the features standard to project management platforms, as well as resource allocation, automation, and agile workflow.N/A
Wrike
Score 8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Adobe WorkfrontWrike
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe WorkfrontWrike
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsEvery premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe WorkfrontWrike
Considered Both Products
Adobe Workfront
Chose Adobe Workfront
I have used Jira, Trello, Microsoft Project, Excel, many task list mgmt. apps (Todoist, RTM, etc.), podio, wrike, and paper. I have never found a project management tool that can accomplish bringing corporate people all into the same system as well as workfront (for large …
Chose Adobe Workfront
Workfront beats them all hands down. Asana was too simplistic for our needs, Wrike was very clunky and didn't handle the finances very well. Clarizen didn't have document approvals and collaboration that we needed. Workfront was a great mix of ease of use, complexity, and …
Chose Adobe Workfront
We have used Wrike - when we used it, it was not as advanced, but it may be updated now. We chose Workfront for its robust options - project and task management, resource management, financial and scope management, reporting, workflows, etc. Workfront is flexible in that you …
Chose Adobe Workfront
This is apples and oranges. Wrike is an easy-to-use tool but now feels very basic compared to Workfront. It was too simplified for our needs, and did not allow us to break down large, high-level projects to the steps that we needed. Workfront allows for a lot more details and …
Chose Adobe Workfront
We also use Wrike and Asana. Workfront is way better for in-depth reporting compared to Asana, but lacks the intuitive task management that Asana offers. Asana is just easier to use. Workfront is night and day better than Wrike in almost every aspect. Better reporting, …
Chose Adobe Workfront
Workfront is more robust and versatile than Asana and Smartsheets, which is why we did not go with those tools. It is pretty comparable to Wrike in many ways. We use Workfront over Wrike because we are set up in Workfront already.
Chose Adobe Workfront
Adobe is very intuitive in its workflow automation and creation of the task workflows that can be used as templates for employees. That is harder to create in Teams unless there is [the] integration of another Microsoft product and more time spent on it by an IT professional. …
Chose Adobe Workfront
I would find that feature-to-feature comparisons and extensive features put Workfront at the same class level as Workamajig. It may come down to preferences and UX of the platform that would make for the ultimate decision on which to go with for project management needs. Asana
Chose Adobe Workfront
I am a consumer of Workfront for a couple of years now and am a major defender of this venture and the board apparatus for a few reasons. 1) I think that it's exceptionally natural for clients to utilize. 2) It is effectively tweaked dependent on the requirements of your …
Chose Adobe Workfront
Workfront has better integration into the tools we use, like Adobe Creative Suite, Outlook, Salesforce, and our CMS and DAM. We needed a solution that could work well with our MarCOMM Stack and didn't need a whole lot of support. Although we're a small shop (license-wise) …
Chose Adobe Workfront
I haven't really used the other systems. I have only researched them and compared them against each other. I chose Workfront because I felt like the UX/UI and the breadth of what Workfront offers far outweighed the opposition.
Chose Adobe Workfront
Workfront is more customizable and has better prioritization and reporting
Chose Adobe Workfront
When shopping for a project management system, Workfront was the clear winner for our group. The proofing tool, mobile app and product features were far superior to all other products we reviewed and saw demos of.
Chose Adobe Workfront
I prefer workfront but Service Now has better reports
Chose Adobe Workfront
The team collaboration and communication tools won over our users!
Wrike
Chose Wrike
Ultimately, the choice between Wrike and Adobe Workfront will depend on the specific needs and requirements of your organization. If you are looking for a more comprehensive project management tool that includes features for team collaboration and integrations with other tools, …
Chose Wrike
They all have pros and cons, but Workfront is the most robust, while Asana is the middle ground for affordability that meets all our teams’ needs.
Chose Wrike
Wrike always works - it's always up-to-date, never down, and our one source of truth.
I wish the mobile version of Wrike was more usable, but that's the only thing where Wrike may not be the front runner.
Chose Wrike
For its ease of use, Better project management, Project/task view, Ease of coordination with colleagues, its vertical layout for project updates and comments, and Logical layout.
Chose Wrike
So much better! It's so much easier to manage projects and tasks in Wrike. Input is easier, finding work and documents is easier. Everything about it is better. I would literally walk away from the computer in frustration at times while trying to find or add things to …
Chose Wrike
I like that Wrike is more simple. The walled garden approach of work front causes more issues than it solves.
Chose Wrike
wrike gets really granular with tasks and ownership, and allows you to automate particular project mechanics that other software does not do. Wrike is also very collaborative, with the ability to manage your own dashboard or create one for others that allows to easily …
Chose Wrike
We have not used Workfront enough to make a fair comparison. It just rolled out for us last month.
Chose Wrike
Wrike is competitive by offering a wide range of integrations with other popular tools and apps, allowing you to sync data, collaborate in familiar settings, and maximize efficiency. Its integration with apps like
Chose Wrike
I used Workfront at a previous job and found it to be overly complex and not user-friendly. I also used Jira, which I did not find as intuitive as Wrike. However, Jira did have a very useful capability to run reports on each project, showing the time that each contributor …
Chose Wrike
Wrike feels more cohesive with a wholistic approach. This is because to things like email notifications, scheduling capabilities, etc.
Asana manages tasks well but feels like the daughter or son of Wrike, as it doesn't have as many features. Depending on your purposes, one may …
Chose Wrike
Wrike is better than average for detailed projects across multiple teams with multiple stakeholders, and for longer term projects like campaigns, with a lot of moving parts. It does require each user have more training to avoid breaking a small piece that throws the whole thing …
Chose Wrike
Wrike was as easy to use as any other online workflow management platform I have used. It was a very quick setup and quick training time vs other platforms I have used, which is a big advantage. It is a pleasure to use it and I would use it again.
Chose Wrike
Workfront was NOT user-friendly. It required extensive customization and user feedback was that it took a lot to upskill to use. Wrike won in the ease of use for our people.
Chose Wrike
Hands down Wrike works better for our team's needs. I have tried many PM tools, and Wrike is by far my preference. To the point that at my current job, I requested it in the interview process.
Chose Wrike
Over the last 7 years we have utilized several project management solutions and yet none of them could compare to the ease of implementation and the speed with which resources could ramp up as we found with Wrike. Our PMO credits the extreme simplicity yet fully functioned UI …
Chose Wrike
Wrike's interface is much easier to use and the ability to see projects move through the team to completion has been a game-changer for our team.
Chose Wrike
Here is why we went with Wrike over other tools:
  • Workfront - Wrike was a better price point at our usage level. It is more flexible and could be customized around our type of work. It is also faster to use
  • Asana - Wrike is much more robust in my opinion. Asset management, …
Chose Wrike
On a scale from 1 to 10, Wrike is a 7. It does online Agile PM tracking but has limited baselining, RoadMapping, and Gannt functionality.
Chose Wrike
Wrike can stand next to AtTask and be proud. We selected Wrike not only because of pricing but also because of size. AtTask can be built out the way you want it, but it takes a while. Wrike is preset and ready to go. It fit for our needs and the size of our company. AtTask
Chose Wrike
Wrike feels a lot like a more powerful Asana. And Workfront - well - we had a lot of issues with that system. It may have just been too big for our needs, but Wrike felt just right for an organization of our size with our needs.
Chose Wrike
Our team used Asana in the past, yet as our team developed and grew (it's now about 30 people), some things were lacking. Workfront promised to be a full enterprise solution, but at the time it just wasn't there for us -- despite the fact that Workfront worked hard to help us …
Chose Wrike
I have used Microsoft Project. We also looked at several different tools at the time we selected Wrike including Attask, the open source tool Open-Project and jira. I really liked Attask but it was a very expensive. The other tools lacked the flexibility that Wrike delivers.
Features
Adobe WorkfrontWrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Workfront
8.6
304 Ratings
12% above category average
Wrike
8.0
758 Ratings
5% above category average
Task Management10.0303 Ratings8.9752 Ratings
Resource Management9.0275 Ratings8.2635 Ratings
Gantt Charts9.0243 Ratings8.6531 Ratings
Scheduling8.0271 Ratings8.1657 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.0273 Ratings8.3643 Ratings
Team Collaboration8.0293 Ratings8.7751 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.0186 Ratings7.4391 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology6.4199 Ratings8.3348 Ratings
Document Management6.8275 Ratings7.4633 Ratings
Email integration10.0231 Ratings7.3569 Ratings
Mobile Access8.0234 Ratings7.9550 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking10.0220 Ratings7.6345 Ratings
Change request and Case Management9.0211 Ratings7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management10.0189 Ratings7.4266 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Workfront
6.0
173 Ratings
23% below category average
Wrike
7.8
264 Ratings
3% above category average
Quotes/estimates5.181 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Invoicing6.071 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Project & financial reporting6.4171 Ratings7.5260 Ratings
Integration with accounting software6.362 Ratings8.3152 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adobe WorkfrontWrike
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe WorkfrontWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(355 ratings)
8.6
(792 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(60 ratings)
8.4
(99 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(18 ratings)
8.4
(114 ratings)
Availability
9.1
(9 ratings)
7.8
(22 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(4 ratings)
7.5
(19 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(12 ratings)
7.3
(88 ratings)
In-Person Training
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Online Training
8.9
(4 ratings)
7.6
(12 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.3
(10 ratings)
7.7
(32 ratings)
Configurability
5.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(11 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
10.0
(1 ratings)
6.7
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
1.0
(1 ratings)
6.9
(7 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(3 ratings)
7.7
(14 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(3 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
1.0
(1 ratings)
5.9
(6 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(7 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe WorkfrontWrike
Likelihood to Recommend
Adobe
Workfront enables us to manage all our projects effectively while providing a comprehensive overview of team resources. The Resource Planner helps the team identify their capacity to determine whether they are over- or under-allocated. This information is crucial for project planning and ensuring team members do not experience burnout.
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike is well-suited for content creation, review, and management. I can't speak to other types of work it can be suitable for because I use it as a writer only, but I would recommend it to other people in content creation fields who have to work with a team. A friend of mine is an editor at the local newspaper, and I think some features of Wrike would make her editing tasks a little easier and promote more cohesion in her team.
Read full review
Pros
Adobe
  • Fosters communication between team members.
  • Serves as a virtual "to do list" for me personally - I can track where I am with projects and what there is left to do, and when it's completed.
  • Sharing documents between team members that can be updated.
Read full review
Wrike
  • different views to accommodate different users workflow
  • predecessors and successors to tie tasks together and adjust dates as a group
  • Being able to see other people's workloads so when I am planning my projects for the upcoming quarter, I can set a project delivery date that is better suited to workload and is more realistic
Read full review
Cons
Adobe
  • It can sometimes be a bit difficult to keep track of multiple projects
  • Hard to include people who do not have a Adobe Workfront account
  • I wish there were better notifications around when tasks are removed or you are unassigned from a task
Read full review
Wrike
  • Templating.
  • For example, let's say we are onboarding a new client. There are certain tasks that need to be done. It would be great to be able to create a new project and have certain tasks preloaded.
  • Importing.
  • Importing may seem easy, but there is so much nuance to it. The fact that you need to make sure the parent task comes before child tasks is very difficult to do without the help of AI. Also, I am not sure it is possible if you have a thousand tasks to import, to make sure that you have a folder structure and parent/child tasks.
  • I also find that the documentation is lacking and the 2 import methods lacking as well.
  • Customize my inbox. When I log into Wrike, my Inbox is the first thing I see, but this doesn't show the full picture of what I want it.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Adobe
All that I've said already is why. I suppose the clearest way to say it is that at this point? I cannot imagine running the 300+ active projects in eMarketing without AtTask; it simply wouldn't be possible and even more; I wouldn't imagine why we'd try to find an alternative tool when we have one meeting our needs.
Read full review
Wrike
I wish that Wrike had more drag and drop functionality that would be connected to assignee and also I wish that the finish date of a task would update to the date where you checked completed. It does not do that. Also finishing a task doesn't move the start date of the next task it "protects your time in that way", but our management team wants us to quickly see what we have down the pipeline rather than having to scroll down the list of upcoming tasks.
Read full review
Usability
Adobe
For my needs, it's easy to jump in and out of, make changes and update projects, and check in with my employers. I haven't used to it create my own projects, they're created by my employer as we go, I suspect it's not hard to use in that way, but I don't have first-hand knowledge.
Read full review
Wrike
The platform is intuitive, easy to navigate, and flexible enough to accommodate the complexity of payer contracting workflows. Features such as custom workflows, automated reminders, and real-time collaboration make it simple for our team to stay aligned and efficient. Wrike allows us to track negotiations and related tasks without needing extensive training or technical expertise, which has driven adoption across departments and ensured consistent usage.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Adobe
Maintenance is required, but usually after work hours, Some days the proofing tool function is not operational, but this is a new function of the tool that WF is working out. the kinks on. Chrome is the best browser to use the system in and we find Firefox and Explorer lose some view functionality - Gantt Chart, Resource Grid
Read full review
Wrike
Over two years of (almost) daily usage without outages. Don't remember any errors. I give it 9 only because some Wrike plugins (for online document edit) are based on NPAPI architecture. These types of plugins are being phased out in new browsers, and NPAPI plugins are disabled by default in recent versions of Chrome so you have to do some browser adjustments when you switch browsers or move to another computer.
Read full review
Performance
Adobe
Workfront's performance has been very good. Everything always feels very fast and snappy in my experience. We have integrated it with custom scripts to create folder structure for media managing our projects. It works very well.
Read full review
Wrike
Wrike tasks loads fine, but I hate clicking files and wait for a bit of time since it is powerpoint or word, Wrike assumes I want to open those on Wrike. My suggestion is to link it to office 365 so we do not need Wrike based decoder for PPTX and DOCX
Read full review
Support Rating
Adobe
It would be nice if the support forms were more dynamic so you could add more information to the support ticket when you enter it to reduce back and forth with the support team member. Also communication on escalated tickets isn't always great. It's gotten better over the years but still needs improvement. Other than that, initial response on support tickets is really quick and the people I've dealt with have always been very professional.
Read full review
Wrike
During my learning phase with Wrike, I initially struggled with setting up automation rules and request forms. However, Wrike support was always my go-to, resolving issues within seconds or minutes. Their assistance made the learning process much easier. My best experience was receiving step-by-step screenshots to follow, with the support team on standby until I was completely satisfied.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Adobe
It was from my boss, not a rep from AtTask.
Read full review
Wrike
We had staff in person provide some training
Read full review
Online Training
Adobe
The training is very easy to use and you can simply choose the topics included in the course(s) that are most important to your training needs. After each training course, you are tested on what you have learned. If you need a refresher course, they provide Course Catalogs as well as instructor-led courses & workshops.
Read full review
Wrike
I love the Wrike training options. Wrike Discover has tons of courses, learning plans, certifications, etc. This is an area where Wrike definitely shines! I wish these resources were more in your face for new people, because it seems like a lot of coworkers didn't know all of this training was available to them.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Adobe
Most people learn as you go, a lot of this stuff requires trial and error throughout so my suggestion is to provide as much information in the upfront and keep it as simple as possible. You can add other tools and features as you go but everyone should have the basics down so no bad habits can start to develop. Be persistent with everyone, and don't be afraid to correct and talk through steps again so everyone is on the same page
Read full review
Wrike
There are a lot of bells and whistles in Wrike, and not all of it is easy or intuitive to understand once it's plopped in your lap. It's easier when there are a few choice people who understand Wrike as a platform and articulate it in such a way where it makes it easy to pass it along to others in the group
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Adobe
It's been a while since I've used another time and resource management platform, but I would say that Adobe Workfront takes the cake. Its newly refreshed user interface is simple to navigate, whereas other platforms can be quite confusing when "drilling down" on a project. Also, Adobe Workfront has features that I have not seen in other platforms, including collaboration capabilities and the ability to upload a document as proof so it can be reviewed for grammar, consistency, formatting, etc., before being presented or sent to a client.
Read full review
Wrike
We use both monday.com and Wrike. While Monday does have a better user interface, Wrike allows us to have more visibility into tasks where multiple people are collaborating. And also to receive project brief-ins and requests for new projects. We use both differently and I would say for us Wrike is more the collaboration tool than the day to day individual task management tool - and it works great.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Adobe
As I stated earlier, I didn't have to pay for Workfront myself- I'm a user under a large organization. I know it's not cheap to implement, I don't know how the price scales for a small-business, but I do like the product enough that I'm going to look into it in the future for my own company.
Read full review
Wrike
company purchase
Read full review
Scalability
Adobe
We have been using Workfront for about 3 years. During this time they continue to be a very stable project management system. Workfront's overall scalability is able to handle increased loads of work. When using Workfront for a project management tool for the web team, we store documents, images & video's without any issues. They work with their customer's to provide the best project management system in the market today! I highly recommend Workfront for all project management needs. Workfront strives to deliver unique technology solutions to growing companies!
Read full review
Wrike
The sky is the limit for what can be done in Wrike. We started with 1 use case and within 5 months we migrated several key business practices over to Wrike because they were easier to manage. Use cases so far: process improvement, management review, corrective actions, maintenance requests, month-end financial closing, and document management. As we grow, it's easy to imagine putting even more into Wrike where it becomes a cornerstone for how we do business
Read full review
Professional Services
Adobe
No answers on this topic
Wrike
I do not use professional services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Adobe
  • It will help teams to manage their workflow and impact on the overall productivity.
  • Also, one-stop for the higher management to know [the] status [of] all projects in one go - more visibility, comfort tracking.
  • Easy to track what is in backlog for the team and if any individual [is] stuck on a particular task.
Read full review
Wrike
  • Wrike has improved our resource management significantly.
  • Wrike has improved the request intake process for us.
  • One negative impact of using Wrike is that we had to include Workato for some customised automations, which were not supported by Unito, but this can be on a need-to basis.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Adobe Workfront Screenshots

Screenshot of Tasks in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Work Requests in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Review Functionality in Adobe WorkfrontScreenshot of Adobe Workfront Planning

Wrike Screenshots

Screenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of DashboardsScreenshot of Space workflowsScreenshot of Space workflows