OpenAI offers ChatGPT, an advanced general intelligence (AGI) chatbot which interacts in a conversational way. The dialogue format makes it possible for ChatGPT to answer followup questions, admit its mistakes, challenge incorrect premises, and reject inappropriate requests. ChatGPT is a sibling model to InstructGPT, which is trained to follow an instruction in a prompt and provide a detailed response.
$0
per month
WRITER
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
WRITER is an end-to-end platform for building, activating, and supervising AI agents across the enterprise. It empowers IT and business teams to collaboratively build agents that automate work, improve decision making, and drive business outcomes.
$39
per month per user
Pricing
ChatGPT
WRITER
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
per month
Plus
$20
per month
Team
$30
per month per user
Pro
$200
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Starter
$39
per month per user
Enterprise
Custom
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ChatGPT
WRITER
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ChatGPT
WRITER
Considered Both Products
ChatGPT
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose ChatGPT
Most tailored for multi-functional use across departments, a business version where data resides in your own workspace and is not used for training. Safest feel overall.
ChatGPT is often seen as the default and the leader and first and most widely adopted generative AI engine. However, I tend to find that Google Gemini can more accurately cite sources and offers more disclaimers. ChatGPT is prone to answering everything, at the risk of …
I tried and bought multiple tools like Perplexity, Jasper, and Copy.ai, but no one is comparable with ChatGPT. Most of the tools are built for a specific niche, but ChatGPT is built for everything.
they all work very similar, and since answers are probabilistic, sometimes you get better answers from other similar apps. ChatGPT was a pioneer and its several iterations have made many improvements in usability. It's as a wide set of knowledge and you can pretty much ask it …
For breaking news and very up to date data, Grok and Perplexity are better. They have access to very recent or proprietary data that's relevant to any topic you want to research. Gemini is great for large prompt context needs. I would use Claude for more coding related stuff. …
ChatGPT is simply the most complete, well-rounded AI tool in existence right now. It can do everything the others can, often better, and often in a way that's more intuitive and easier to iterate. It takes prompts far better than most, and incorporates direction better than …
In my experience ChatGPT does great job than any other LLM model at this moment. However, in terms of web search, perplexity scores high compared to ChatGPT because ChatGPT misses critical news while doing web crawling
We've used other programs, including ones integrated into current products that we use, and we've found that ChatGPT delivers better in the sense of content learning and creation. Other programs do offer some research ability, but we're found ChatGPT is more diverse and …
ChatGPT is an excellent writing, ideating, and editing assistant with an American attitude. This LLM learns from human input and can give very sound results in unexpected situations. 'Memory' feature is especially useful, because it saves a lot of time and effort, so the LLM …
Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled …
In my experience, Claude won't say things it feels is offensive or callous (for instance I asked for themed slogans for a bachelor party where I was the best man), and only provided G and PG related content. ChatGPT was quick to get naughty with puns and slogans, especially …
I find the images generator much better in getting what you asked for using ChatGPT. When using FireFly or Midjourney I tend to take the prompt that was generated in ChatGPT in order for me to get something more visually stunning. So the visuals could be much better, room for …
We also use Adobe Firefly as an AI assistant. Maybe this should be expected, as Adobe are experts in visual design software, but Adobe Firefly handles AI image generation a lot better than ChatGPT seems to. ChatGPT's images appear to be very loose and untidy, but in comparison, …
I find most of the pop AI's annoying. When I did a comparison between Chat, and Bard for example, Bard seems more clinical. It's difficult to shut it down thereafter. (I believe I successfully disable it) META is like that too. If you're on Facebook and want to look up …
I tried to find the learning platforms on your search bar but nothing returned. It's basically a contest on who can implement our company's training point of view in all of their training assets/workflows. None of the 5 companies can match what WRITER did. This is because we …
I did not select WRITER, as it was selected by my predecessor. I am not sure they even evaluated the tool against others, as I heard it was used at her previous organization. WRITER would not have been on my tools to evaluate and I most likely would have went with Jasper.
I use both. Copilot does a great job of sources content but lacks good outputs. Writer can import that content and make the deliverable understandable and useful.
Writer's "recipes" and workflow approach allow me to think through the process of generation better than an open-chat format like ChatGPT or Gemini. It also is more flexible than Jasper (at least when I tested both).
Grammarly notoriously falls short on inclusive writing suggestions. Grammarly always missing out on punctuation that Writer's app picks up. The free version of Grammarly doesn't allow you view suggestions at-a-glance.
The Writer Chrome extension provides a helpful side-panel …
i find Writer a more comprehensive tool, although ChatGPT's ability to write social media posts is similar to that of Writer. Writer can tackle longer pieces of writing. their summarisation skills are comparable.
Writer has the best quality writing I've come across. Writer is also best in class when it comes to applying brand voice in a way that feels human and authentic. I also love the clean interface. I don't get distracted; I just get down to writing. The Learning Center is also a …
Each other tool has AI capabilities, but Writer is a communication or marketing team's best friend. So much of what we do is driven by the written word and needing to craft a ton of it in short order. Writer helps us sound like we're writing for the company, gets us from blank …
I love how Writer's interface is clearly designed as an entire page -- instead of a tiny textbox at the corner of the screen. I also appreciate the emphasis on privacy and security.
Writer is one of the more affordable AI writing assistant platforms but it doesn't have as much depth as some of the others for SEO analysis and optimization recommendations. Writer's focus is definitely more on copywriting aspects of content creation vs optimization.
Castmagic is harder to use (its UX leaves much to be desired) but for content creation, its abilities are superior than Writer's. I actually use both programs. I appreciate that Castmagic automatically provides a transcript.
Writer is best tool among its competitors as it does the automated correction and automated sentence completion very well. Also, it's following the data security guidelines so we know that our data is safe with Writer. Writer makes the sentence with AI and gives a good impact …
Wordpress is not very clear about the tools that are available with some themes over others. Instead, Write has multiple functions and makes the work complete in its entirety. It's easy to navigate and it also allows me to use multiple accounts. It has database links and at the …
Helps my team get material ready for publishing as fast as possible It's very customisable and helpful for purposes beyond simple grammar and spelling checks. We can use it to ensure punctuation/formatting consistency, naming consistency (we use a lot of proprietary …
Grammarly is very advanced, but I use Writer as It offers me additional features like word count, a cleaner interface, and a word processor for taking notes.
I’d definitely recommend ChatGPT to anyone as a great introduction to generative AI and as a starting point in research, writing, brainstorming, or general questions or judgement questions. It can be a great tool to use when you don’t necessarily need an accurate answer. For example, I wouldn’t let it calculate my taxes, but I’d use it to ask some general tax questions, then ask for sources and then verify by checking those sources. I also love ChatGPT for writing and questions - it’s great for emails, creating templates and outlines, and for generating spreadsheet formulas.
I think Writer is perfect for marketing professionals who need to draft copy about dense topics and subject matter, such as within tech and product companies. It bridges the gap of knowledge between marketer and engineer and saves the former countless minutes to bring what the latter develops to the marketplace
Saves time by generating content about a specific topic very quickly
Allows us to quickly learn information online (from various sources or even a single lengthy article) into more summed up digestible paragraphs (and even bullet points)
Can autogenerate content on a vast amount of topics
Rewrite tool is incredibly helpful; both in the Writer environment and the Google Chrome extension. Not buggy or laggy like other extensions I've tried.
Ask Writer allows me to engage with documents in a conversational manner, instead of spending time crafting and sharpening my prompts.
Quality responses from Ask Writer. Unlike other GPTs that are riddled with mistakes and hallucinations, I can use Writer confidently without being paranoid about triple-checking my work. I've used Writer for one year now and only found one error in that time.
Wish it had support for better slides generation. Sometimes we found ourselves using chatgpt to outline a presentation but build it ourselves or use a tool like Gamma
Maybe a chepear $10 plan. In some countries the US dollar can be expensive and $20 goes a long way.
I wish you could make projects with more files. They limit it. Or make the limit based on the content, not the number of files per se
i do find the organisation a bit confusing, like the functions available in 'ask Writer' being separate to the main window. there were lots of functions i wasn't able to find intuitively that we needed a support call for
asking for a summary of key points doesn't always pick up the main points
ChatGPT is a powerful assistant. As long as you understand what it is you're looking for in its results, it can save you a lot of time due to its ability to do the heavy lifting for you. This frees your time up to enable you to concentrate on other tasks.
Most of the time is up. Seldom do you find a down service. It also has improved in token generation (the speed at which it prints answers) so it's usability is pretty much great all the time. Images do take a bit to generate but nothing that breaks anything. New additions like Projects, custom prompts, and some privacy settings improve experience
Where ChatGPT is better: ChatGPT has significantly more use cases - it's much more versatile. Some aspects of ChatGPT's user experience are better than Claude's. I prefer ChatGPT's results presentation compared to Claude's. Where Claude excels: Claude is a more skilled writer than ChatGPT. Some aspects of Claude's user experience are better than ChatGPT's. Its image, audio, and video translations are better than ChatGPT's.
I tried to find the learning platforms on your search bar but nothing returned. It's basically a contest on who can implement our company's training point of view in all of their training assets/workflows. None of the 5 companies can match what WRITER did. This is because we would be needing a blank canvass to paint our vision of what a perfect training looks like; the other platforms may or may not be open to some of the suggestions that we might IMMEDIATELY need; since WRITER is just a regular Full-Stack AI platform and we already pay for it; we did not need to find another solution for this and potentially saved hundred thousand dollars
