TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

SAP Build Reviews & Insights

Score8.4 out of 10

101 Reviews and Ratings

Who Buys & Uses SAP Build

Based on 879 HG Insights installations.

Powered by

Insights from SAP Build Reviewers

Based on 17 verified reviews published in the last 18 months


Synthesised from 17 reviews | Last Published April 23, 2026


This product assessment synthesizes insights from 17 recent reviews covering overall satisfaction, ROI, integration, and workflow automation. SAP Build is primarily used for application development, automation, and integration within the SAP ecosystem. A significant portion of users leverage it for application development, including creating applications and workflows, and building side-by-side extensions on SAP S4/HANA (7 of 17 reviewers). Reviewers frequently cite improvements in efficiency after adopting SAP Build, with 10 of 17 mentioning increased efficiency due to better integration and faster development cycles. SAP Build's workflow and automation capabilities are also a major draw, with 8 reviewers highlighting the benefits of automating tasks like invoice processing and employee onboarding. However, some users have experienced challenges, including runtime errors, data volume issues, and integration complexities. Specifically, 5 reviewers cited challenges with the integration process, such as incomplete documentation and API inconsistencies. Additionally, 3 reviewers expressed concerns about performance and licensing costs. While SAP Build offers a compelling value proposition for organizations seeking to streamline processes and accelerate application development within the SAP ecosystem, potential buyers should carefully consider the reported integration challenges and performance considerations.


  • Application development and workflow creation
  • Automation of tasks like invoice processing and employee onboarding
  • Integration of SAP modules and enhancement of data concurrency
  • Increased efficiency due to better integration and faster development cycles (10 of 17 reviewers)
  • Reduced development effort due to ease of use (5 of 17 reviewers)
  • Runtime errors and data volume issues
  • Integration challenges, including incomplete documentation and API inconsistencies (5 of 17 reviewers)
  • Performance concerns
  • Licensing costs
  • Difficulties for some developers
Loading Reviews List....