TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Atlassian Jira vs. Tricentis qTest

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Atlassian Jira

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAtlassian Jira is a project management tool, featuring an interactive timeline for mapping work items, dependencies, and releases, Scrum boards for agile teams, and out-of-the-box reports and dashboards.

    $9

    per month per user

    Tricentis qTest

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Pricing
    Atlassian JiraTricentis qTest
    Editions & Modules
    Standard
    $9
    per month per user
    Premium
    $17
    per month per user
    Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    per year
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Atlassian JiraTricentis qTest
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsHigher volume teams may qualify buyers for a discount.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Atlassian JiraTricentis qTest
    Considered Both Products
    Atlassian
    Chose Atlassian Jira
    It's ability to handle issue management and ticket.

    Incentivized
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    I have used HP AlM, Redmine , ADO in past and I loved qTest for its ability to integrate with CI tool , automation frameworks and Jira.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    As I am not the actual decision maker of which tool to purchase. I have always liked the Tricentis qTest tool. Decision has been made by the top management, The tool has proven is value and for the Same reason it is still being used.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis is easy to use and user friendly. Less time consuming with lot of good utilities. And for better test management. qTest also stacks up better than the above tools due to its efficiency, test case interface and test execution interface. Excellent comments area and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    - It was not our decision to use qTest as a tool, as this was a management decision.
    - Since I have used many Test Management Tools I can compare for e.g
    The Reporting and Statistics in qTest is very impressive.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    I have worked on Jira, but i found it more difficult interface to handle. It was not user friendly. The defect management was also not impressive. qTest experience actually helped me to take decision while evaluating.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis was better suited to our processes, tools integration and migration of data from our prior tool set.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Still evaluating. TestRail seems to be a far better solution but we need to solve migration issues.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Tricentis qTest provides a neater package, with easier test execution and better integration with our other tools.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Prior to qTest, the teams were using TestLink.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    The main tool we compared to Tricentis qTest Explorer was the "Steps Recorder" that comes with Windows. We selected Tricentis qTest Explorer because, at least at the time, Steps Recorder would sometimes skip recording arbitrary steps, which didn't meet our needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    Didn’t have the same ease of use for us and didn’t integrate as well into our test process.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    None of our previous tools we listed in the available drop-down options. We had previously used Spira Test and Xray as our test repositories. We are currently evaluating Test Rail, Zephyr, PractiTest, and others.

    From an organizational perspective, qTest is better than Xray as …
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    We felt like for the feature set and due to the fact it was mid-range on the cost, it was a good choice. It also has some other plugins which we plan to utilize at some point like Tosca.
    Incentivized
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    We found that Tricentis qTest and TestRail have some similarities, but the main problem was that we needed to use an existing shared instance of TestRail, and we discovered that there was no easy way to prevent users of other projects from editing or even accidentally deleting …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Atlassian JiraTricentis qTest
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Atlassian Jira and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    Atlassian Jira
    9.5
    3 Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Resource Management9.43 Ratings00 Ratings
    Gantt Charts9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Team Collaboration10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Agile Methodology8.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Support for Waterfall Methodology9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document Management8.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Email integration9.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Timesheet Tracking10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Change request and Case Management10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budget and Expense Management9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Professional Services Automation
    Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Atlassian Jira and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    Atlassian Jira
    9.9
    2 Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    -
    Ratings
    Quotes/estimates9.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Invoicing9.72 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project & financial reporting10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with accounting software10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of Atlassian Jira and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    Atlassian Jira
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    7.5
    27 Ratings
    Centralized test management00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.223 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings7.426 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings7.922 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Atlassian JiraTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.6
    (190 ratings)
    8.1
    (29 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (35 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.4
    (31 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    5.3
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (23 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    7.7
    (8 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)