Emma by Marigold vs. MessageGears

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Emma by Marigold
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Emma by Marigold is an email marketing solution. Its key features include mobile-ready design templates, email automation, audience segmentation, and dynamic content. The software includes integration with third-party CRM solutions, ecommerce platforms, and social networks.
$500
per year per user
MessageGears
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
MessageGears is a hybrid email marketing service built around deliverability, actionable customer data, and audience segmentation and targeting.N/A
Pricing
Emma by MarigoldMessageGears
Editions & Modules
Basic
$500
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Emma by MarigoldMessageGears
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Emma by MarigoldMessageGears
Considered Both Products
Emma by Marigold
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is a step up from Constant Contact and two steps up from Mailchimp. Emma is affordable and easy to use for all types of companies, but especially for smaller firms and startups. It’s in compliance with SPAM laws, but has an advanced platform to keep your emails from going …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I like Emma much better than MailChimp because of the flexibility and ease of the user interface. I used MailChimp for a previous position and I felt like the home page was definitely more cluttered and it had a clumsier navigation portal. I also think Emma's email design …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma had a more robust multi-level account structure which empowered individual locations to participate at the ground-level. Additionally corporate was able to maintain oversight, template creation, marketing automation, and data reporting. The goal is to provide the locations …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I use MailChimp a lot, and while I like it, at the end of the day Emma simply is the most cost-effective. There's not a HUGE learning curve, compared to MailChimp, which is nice, since our non-designers can take a proverbial 'whack' at an email and we can trust that it will get …
Chose Emma by Marigold
We prefer Emma, as it is a much more robust platform offering some of the best functionality and out of the box integrations.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Compared to Act-On, Emma is miles above regarding the ease of use and simplification of complex features. Drip campaigns really are a breeze with Emma's intuitive data. You will experience WYSIWYG glitches due to the nature of the program but Emma offers better templates to …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is a good alternative, but I think mailchimp may be a better and more affordable alternative. Especially since mailchimp is continuously releasing new features and improving their product.
Chose Emma by Marigold
MailChimp seems to offer more customizable options than Emma, but Emma is far less buggy. I used Constant Contact while working with another nonprofit organization and did not anything about it.
Chose Emma by Marigold
We moved away from Constant Contact because of the reputation it was starting to get with not auditing its domain and not providing us with the best possible brand reputation and also because we just didn't get the analytics we wanted to improve our process. With Emma, we can …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is the easiest to use platform I've tried so far. It was easy to setup and send the first enewsletter. The functionality is very user friendly and it "makes sense" as you go through to add content and users. It's made being a marketing team of one very efficient.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Mail Chimp: the price was better, but the platform was not predictable. You did not get the same support with mailchimp.
Constant Contact: This is an outdated system that does not make it easy to design modern, clean emails and I consider it a dinosaur.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Mailchimp is the global choice for our university and there is a pricing structure in place.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma was the perfect solution for what we were looking for due to its easy to use interface, relatively low cost and basic functionality. We were not looking for expensive, complex tools to send out multiple campaigns with various controls and tests. We also were impressed with …
Chose Emma by Marigold
At the time we made the decision to move to Emma, my organization was using both MailChimp and Constant Contact. Emma's drag-and-drop template editor surpassed both, and even editing the pre-made template HTML in Emma was easier. List management was much smoother than the …
Chose Emma by Marigold
We moved from Emma to SendGrid. The deliverability of Emma is lower than Sendgrid and the overall functionality of Sendgrid feels more fit for a digital marketing agency. The number and design of the Emma templates far surpasses that of Sendgrid though. Emma is much more suited …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I think that Emma is more user-friendly.
Chose Emma by Marigold
None of those platform were good for an agency and their clients. Managing multiple email clients in one system isn't something you find everywhere. It's also not easy to pay for the other platforms since they are built for the enterprise and not SMB.
Chose Emma by Marigold
Our internal competitors are the individual email platforms our stores have signed up for. In general, they need to take our HTML and upload it themselves, making Constant Contact and MailChimp very cumbersome. Emma, on the other hand, allows us to take charge of that. Users …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Very similar to MailChimp. More user-friendly than Constant Contact but fewer ways to customize formatting.
Chose Emma by Marigold
We chose Emma in addition to Sendgrid to protect the integrity of our transactional email deliverability. Emma's delivery rates were good. We later found Mailchimp a bit cheaper and easier to work with in our specific use case but I still think it's worth testing Emma if you're …
Chose Emma by Marigold
MUCH more straightforward and usable, PeopleVine requires someone with a lot more coding knowledge to do simple things like change a font color or hyperlink text and is better used by an agency with extensive access to those experts whereas Emma can be taught to just about …
Chose Emma by Marigold
Emma is night and day difference from Constant Contact in terms of customer support, feature set, and usability. It is so much better and more affordable. Emma is a step down in feature set and functionality from Pardot, Marketo, or Hubspot, but if you are a company that is not …
Chose Emma by Marigold
I was not with the company when Emma was selected. In my personal experience, I preferred HubSpot.
MessageGears
Chose MessageGears
MessageGears doesn't come close to Salesforce Marketing Cloud. We chose MessageGears based on how data was accessed. We never really got a good preview of how the system works or what was available, so we didn't know everything that it was lacking until we started using it.
Chose MessageGears
MessageGears is a completely different approach to email marketing than its competitors, and while it has a learning curve, it is superior after you've figured it out . The ability to find your audience through SQL on top of quick control of your templates allows for lightning …
Chose MessageGears
Bronto is a much better email service provider, though our choice to use MessageGears is based on our unique database situation, our partnership with them, and our deal structure. The automation and functionality within Bronto is superior, but it also comes with a hefty price …
Features
Emma by MarigoldMessageGears
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Emma by Marigold
9.1
Ratings
14% above category average
MessageGears
3.3
Ratings
83% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor8.00 Ratings1.50 Ratings
Dynamic content9.00 Ratings3.80 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content9.00 Ratings2.20 Ratings
A/B testing9.00 Ratings2.70 Ratings
Mobile optimization9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting10.00 Ratings3.80 Ratings
List management10.00 Ratings2.10 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences9.00 Ratings2.20 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Emma by Marigold
10.0
Ratings
26% above category average
MessageGears
1.1
Ratings
150% below category average
Dashboards10.00 Ratings1.10 Ratings
Standard reports9.90 Ratings1.10 Ratings
Custom reports10.00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
Emma by Marigold
-
Ratings
MessageGears
3.7
Ratings
73% below category average
URL Validation00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Link Tracking00 Ratings2.80 Ratings
Image Validation00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Inbox Display00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Spelling and Grammar Check00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Spam Testing00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Email Previews00 Ratings1.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Emma by MarigoldMessageGears
Small Businesses
Mad Mimi
Mad Mimi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mad Mimi
Mad Mimi
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Litmus from Validity
Litmus from Validity
Score 8.6 out of 10
Emma by Marigold
Emma by Marigold
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Emma by MarigoldMessageGears
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
2.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Emma by MarigoldMessageGears
Likelihood to Recommend
Using Emma for weekly templated email use with minimal changes is awesome. If you want you can create a master and make minor graphic edits quickly and easily from your smartphone. Any edit is possible as long as the artwork is on the online server. Only time I hit a bump in the road is when I was asked to change the style sheet and did not know that the pricing plan I was on did not include this feature. Client had to wait to send new format until Emma performed the requested changes.
Read full review
Unless you have someone on your team who is an expert in writing SQL queries and APIs, this platform is not for you.
Read full review
Pros
  • Drag and Drop Interface - I love the drag-and-drop interface used to design campaigns. It makes it easy for creative types to get the look they want, and it helps less technically and aesthetically adept users to create campaigns that still look great. After using both Constant Contact and Mailchimp, I think Emma comes out on top in terms of ease of template design.
  • Master Admin Account - Having a master admin account controlled by one person allows us to deploy brand assets to each sub-account, and we're also able to push out templates for users who aren't ready or don't have the time to design their own.
  • Dynamic Content - Dynamic content has proven so useful to us, especially in our Admissions Office. Making it possible for regular users to easily create emails using dynamic content is a VERY strong feature that, in my experience, is unique to Emma.
  • Great Tutorials - Emma does a great job taking care of its users. The support folks are always kind and helpful, but Emma publishes an array of tutorials and resources to help with just about anything its users encounter, from how to use custom merge fields to advice on creating the best campaigns.
Read full review
  • Solid customer service
  • Inexpensive solution
  • Flexibility in setup
Read full review
Cons
  • Setup of users - We used to be able to setup a user and send them our own welcome email. Emma has since set up the ability to add users where they send the welcome email. It's a great new feature, but it doesn't always work. We've had some users who never receive these emails and then we need to reach out to support anyway.
  • The code to set up a configurable email is cumbersome. It's great that it is so customizable, but there is a learning curve.
Read full review
  • The platform is extremely literal. Every possible scenario (included unsubscribes) must be written into every audience query.
  • Messy user interface
  • Email development is overly complicated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Easy to use and gets the job done without too many "extras" (ex. we didn't need a full marketing automation platform so Emma had what we needed to send email marketing communications without having to pay for the stuff we didn't need)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
While every WYSIWYG software will experience glitches, Emma handles them well. Keep in mind they rarely happen, but they do, it can be of annoyance. Regardless, Emma allows my organization to create seamless email campaigns using fresh data. Emma makes coming up with strategic decisions very easy. The list segmentation that Emma feature allows us to easily manage a large list without issues. Overall, Emma is extremely usable with nearly no learning curve!
Read full review
Our situation is unique so I believe we are working on a semi-outdated UI which needs a tune up / version upgrade. Similarly, our custom connection means that we do not have access to the full feature set so I've never experienced MessageGears' best functionality
Read full review
Support Rating
I hate that to get support I have to submit a question to a public forum and wait for a response. I just want the ability for a quick live chat to answer my simple help questions quickly or at the very least submit a ticket via email and get a status update.
Read full review
MessageGears support is always quick to respond when we have an issue, which is rare. Gail has been our main rep and she has been great. We don't have many issues so luckily, we don't need to lean on their customer support team much. That said, it would be beneficial to hear from upper management more.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Emma had a more robust multi-level account structure which empowered individual locations to participate at the ground-level. Additionally corporate was able to maintain oversight, template creation, marketing automation, and data reporting. The goal is to provide the locations with the ability to send their own marketing messages, saving corporate marketing time, and providing more genuine, locally-focused email campaigns. Emma was very effective at making that happen.
Read full review
Bronto is a much better email service provider, though our choice to use MessageGears is based on our unique database situation, our partnership with them, and our deal structure. The automation and functionality within Bronto is superior, but it also comes with a hefty price tag; MessageGears provides the scale we need
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • It's been pretty overwhelmingly positive. Our clients are happy about the savings that we're able to pass onto them.
  • We're able to better determine what headlines receive the most clicks from our client's emails based on the dashboard.
  • Super easy email designer that frees up some of our graphic designers to take on other jobs.
Read full review
  • Sending more email!
  • Onboarding handoff was a little rough
  • Great control on who we are sending to
  • Dynamic content is very easy!
Read full review
ScreenShots

Emma by Marigold Screenshots

Screenshot of dynamic content used to send unique, personalized content to each subscriber based on the data stored about them from a single email.Screenshot of the editor's drag & drop layouts and inline text editing, that help to keep the creative process fast and flexible.Screenshot of a display of account activity, email performance and recent mailings in one place right after login.Screenshot of insights on the go using Metric, the included iPhone and Android app.Screenshot of response results that give insights into what's working and provide next steps.Screenshot of customizable, mobile-optimized templates to show off a brand and content in the template gallery.