| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 GiveSmart | Score6.9 out of 10 | N/A | GiveSmart, a Community Brands company, offers a full-service event management platform supporting event website, event registration, attendee tracking, donor management and data insights, and full customer service for entities wishing to raise funds via an auction or charity event. The platform also integrates technology from Community Brands brand Gesture to provide a comprehensive suite of services. GiveSmart replaces the former 501 Auctions, a platform to support charity auctions, mobile… | N/A |
 OneCause | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | OneCause supports fundraising with online and event fundraising solutions that help nonprofits reach more and raise more. Since 2008, OneCause states they have helped 14,000 cause-driven organizations to raise over $8B through more than 90,000 fundraising events and campaigns. | $200 per year |
| GiveSmart | OneCause | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| GiveSmart | OneCause | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose GiveSmart We selected GiveSmart over OneCause because of a few factors: Price The intuitiveness of the platform Reporting Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart My use of GiveSmart as a donor greatly influenced my decision to purchase. OneCause seemed to have better integration of the platform that MobileCause hopes to fill in. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart We were looking into using OneCause, then realized that GiveSmart is very comparable and we were already using the platform. Current participants would then would not need to set up a new user profile for our upcoming events. We had not been taking advantage of the full … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart OneCause and GiveSmart are pretty similar companies. What it came down to at the end was the ease of access to our donors... GiveSmart has the capability of "split-screen" streaming; meaning donors can watch the live stream on one side of the window and participate in bidding … Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart They are similar. GiveSmart had more functionality, and we were already using one of their modules. GiveSmart also had a better price. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart We also checked out HandBid, Charity Proud, and Auctria. We chose GiveSmart for the breadth of capabilities, competitive pricing and credit card processing fees, unlimited logins, ease for our accounting staff to manage, and high support availability. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart Night and day between MemberClicks and GiveSmart with GiveSmart in the lead. Have not used any other products, have just done a bit of research. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart They seem to do about the same type things. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose GiveSmart Much more contemporary and intuitive administration, dashboard, reporting, and user interface for consumers. Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose OneCause We absolutely love 4agood cause for day to day/peer to peer fundraising however, it just was not as robust when it came to event needs which required us to use outside software for those reasons. GiveSmart was good, however a change in their packages required outside sourcing … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose OneCause We prefer OneCause to GiveSmart. The platform is better but the support team is really where we saw a major difference. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose OneCause I have also used Bidding for Good -- a FrontStream product. The main reason I choose OneCause over the others is the customer service and the in-person staffing option. And you are focused on providing event-based services -- GiveSmart is trying to be everything and it's too … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose OneCause Moved from three years with GiveSmart to OneCause/BidPal and I am so much happier and productive. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose OneCause Good value for the money and good customer support. Even when direct account manager was unable to respond quickly, her manger was also available and willing to help us as needed. We used GiveSmart for one year and moved to OneCause BidPal, as they were able to provide … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose OneCause OneCause is a great software that offers some wonderful things that other softwares cannot. It is user-friendly, adaptable, and has much more customization and event offerings than other softwares. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose OneCause OneCause offered more customization on the site, captured better donor information, and was easier to use for both staff and volunteers. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| GiveSmart | OneCause | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Usability | 7.9 | 9.1 |
| Availability | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 8.9 |
| In-Person Training | - | 9.1 |
| Online Training | 8.2 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Configurability | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Ease of integration | 4.5 | - |
| Product Scalability | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Vendor post-sale | 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.1 | 9.1 |
