Greenhouse vs. LinkedIn Talent Hub

Greenhouse

360 Reviews and Ratings

LinkedIn Talent Hub

311 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Greenhouse	Score8.9 out of 10	N/A	Greenhouse delivers a solution to help companies hire for what's next. Their hiring platform has users at companies like DoorDash, Dropbox and Wayfair, who use Greenhouse's intelligent guidance to design and automate all aspects of hiring.	N/A
LinkedIn Talent Hub	Score7.1 out of 10	N/A	LinkedIn Talent is a recruiting solution. It offers core ATS capabilities, as well as proactive recruitment outreach tailored to LinkedIn’s site. LinkedIn Talent also enables competitive insights and recruitment marketing.	N/A

Pricing

Greenhouse

LinkedIn Talent Hub

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Pricing Offerings
Greenhouse	LinkedIn Talent Hub
Free Trial
No	No
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes	No

Required

No setup fee

—

—

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Greenhouse	LinkedIn Talent Hub
Considered Both Products	Greenhouse Software Inc. Verified User Chose Greenhouse I evaluated Leve, JobDiva, SmartRecruiters, and Jobvite 3-4 times in the past few years and I have to say that Greenhouse was at a nice price point and gave us the usability and functionality that we require here at Beeswax. I'm a big fan and their customer service is amazing. … Incentivized Helpful? Avni Shah Senior Talent Partner- HR Operations in Human Resources at RTI (Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Greenhouse I've used a wide variety of Applicant Tracking system's that all had their pain points: Kenexa Brassring Peoplesoft Jobvite Taleo I have to say out of the Applicant Tracking System's I used, Greenhouse has been the best to use. It has done a great job in helping our … Incentivized Helpful? Christine Alling Senior Clinical Recruiter, Platinum Level, Contract in Human Resources at UnitedHealth Group (Human Resources, 201-500 employees) Chose Greenhouse Greenhouse and JobDiva are similar - they're both easy to use and don't require a huge time commitment for the applicant. iCIMS is also easy for the candidate to apply. ADP requires a significant time commitment from the applicant, but, it has integration features that the … Incentivized Helpful? Jim Leahy Technical Talent Acquisition Manager in Human Resources at WayUp (Internet, 51-200 employees) Chose Greenhouse It's not the worst but it's not the best. It has really great features but not the best user support. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Greenhouse Greenhouse in comparison to others we've evaluated is that they cannot comprehend the level of importance when it comes to hiring. Especially during this time where candidates have so many options, the quicker [it is] to move someone throughout the process by just a couple of … Incentivized Helpful? Bryan Moll Principal & Chief Talent Officer in Human Resources at BKR Strategy Group (Internet, 501-1000 employees) Chose Greenhouse Jobvite was the system you used to invite and amplify opportunities. Greenhouse is doing this but excels at streamlining the increased amount of inbound response from said amplification. Incentivized Helpful?	LinkedIn Jenna Montgomery Communications Manager in Marketing at International Relief Teams (Non-Profit Organization Management, 1-10 employees) Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub Greenhouse just does not have as deep and strong a database of candidates (and data on these respective candidates) as LinkedIn Talent. Greenhouse does do a good job of providing tools to make the hiring process visible and accessible for everyone involved but LinkedIn Talent … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub I like LinkedIn Talent Hub over every software i mentioned above. It is very very dynamic and very very easy to use. Connecting with people is very easy. Posting positions is very easy. Overall it is a very great place to look for a candidate to fill up a position. Recommending … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub Linkedin works better in that it is so easily connected to profiles and applicants. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub There are several others to add to the list, but at the end of the day LinkedIn Talent always comes out on top. No other platform has more applicants. Given quantity is not always better than quality, it's even better than the applicants that come from LinkedInTalent are … Incentivized Helpful? Avni Shah Senior Talent Partner- HR Operations in Human Resources at RTI (Information Technology and Services, 51-200 employees) Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub Linkedin Talent does a fairly good job in helping us find candidates. However, the InMails lack a tracking mechanism that tells us when a recruiter can see when a prospective candidate viewed the InMail or even clicked on a link in the InMail. Entelo provides these functions. … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub In addition to LinkedIn, we also use Crelate and are thinking of transitioning to another ATS and/or CRM. It's not necessary that we selected LinkedIn Talent over the others, but more that we understand that it must be used in conjunction with other tools to build the most … Incentivized Helpful? Andy Lutz Technical Recruiter in Human Resources at Segment.com (Internet, 51-200 employees) Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub I feel that it's best to use a full fleet of talent products if your organization can support it financially. All of these tools serve slightly different purposes and each has their own strengths, which when used in combination with each other can create a really powerful … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose LinkedIn Talent Hub Reporting metrics that are designed or have the ability to create dashboards to our needs. With the amount of information that we're gathering, would love to have one location where we can input everything instead of storing this not only in LinkedIn but our ATS and HCM. I'll … Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

Greenhouse

LinkedIn Talent Hub

Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Greenhouse and LinkedIn Talent Hub
Feature	Greenhouse 8.7 139 Ratings	LinkedIn Talent Hub 7.0 77 Ratings
Job Requisition Management	9.6123 Ratings	4.063 Ratings
Company Website Posting	9.6123 Ratings	7.067 Ratings
Publish to Social Media	7.3109 Ratings	8.067 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting	7.4115 Ratings	7.069 Ratings
Customized Application Form	7.5116 Ratings	7.059 Ratings
Resume Management	9.8129 Ratings	7.065 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention	8.0110 Ratings	7.953 Ratings
Candidate Search	8.0112 Ratings	8.076 Ratings
Applicant Tracking	9.4133 Ratings	8.058 Ratings
Collaboration	9.0126 Ratings	8.064 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation	9.1104 Ratings	7.256 Ratings
Email Templates	9.5112 Ratings	6.065 Ratings
User Permissions	9.0115 Ratings	6.060 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts	9.5128 Ratings	6.070 Ratings
Reporting	7.5111 Ratings	7.761 Ratings

User Ratings
	Greenhouse	LinkedIn Talent Hub
Likelihood to Recommend	9.5 (142 ratings)	7.0 (79 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	9.0 (4 ratings)	8.0 (1 ratings)
Usability	9.1 (60 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)
Support Rating	10.0 (16 ratings)	7.5 (22 ratings)
Implementation Rating	6.1 (2 ratings)	- (0 ratings)