HCL Digital Experience vs. Oracle WebCenter Content

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
HCL Digital Experience
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
HCL Digital Experience is based on the former IBM Web Content Manager and IBM WebSphere Portal products, acquired by HCL Technologies from IBM in late 2018. The product allows the user to create, manage and deliver engaging omnichannel digital experiences to audiences with responsive content, targeted offers, seamlessly integrated applications and consistent branding across channels (web, mobile, and hybrid mobile/web applications and more).N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A
Pricing
HCL Digital ExperienceOracle WebCenter Content
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
HCL Digital ExperienceOracle WebCenter Content
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
HCL Digital ExperienceOracle WebCenter Content
Features
HCL Digital ExperienceOracle WebCenter Content
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
5.0
Ratings
49% below category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions5.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
4.1
Ratings
68% below category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
API4.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language4.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
2.9
Ratings
90% below category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness3.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin section3.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Page templates1.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of website themes1.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design4.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Publishing workflow1.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Form generator3.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
1.9
Ratings
117% below category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy1.10 Ratings00 Ratings
SEO support2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Bulk management2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Community / comment management2.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
HCL Digital Experience
-
Ratings
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
Ratings
5% below category average
Content capture & imaging00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Records management00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Content search & retrieval00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation00 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated workflows00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Artificial intelligence00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Integration00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
User Ratings
HCL Digital ExperienceOracle WebCenter Content
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.7
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
HCL Digital ExperienceOracle WebCenter Content
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM Web Content Manager is well suited for intranet employee portals, websites which drive extensive marketing content, and e-commerce sites to provide product images and details. It cannot be used a document management system to store large volumes of data as it's purely a web content management system.
Read full review
If your company is large and uses other Oracle products, Oracle WebCenter Content is probably a worthwhile investment. It integrates well with other Oracle applications and has the potential to help automate some of your existing processes. If you do not use other Oracle products, I would say there are better alternatives out there that are probably more user-friendly and cost effective.
Read full review
Pros
  • Well designed web content management system with clearly defined relationships between the various web content objects such as sites, site areas, authoring templates, presentation templates, library resources, components, web content objects, etc.
  • Can create robust content creation and publishing workflows with workflow stages and workflow actions
  • Web Content can be rendered on multiple devices and browsers in a responsive and adaptive manner.
Read full review
  • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
  • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
  • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
  • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
  • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
Read full review
Cons
  • Search is not working well. We could not get it work even we worked it with IBM support.
  • Java Applet in Ephox editor is pain. You have to watch that you update your Java version correctly or You cannot edit anything. This might work somehow on enterprise environment with tight workstation configuration. I think that Java Applet editor is the worst part of IBM WCM
  • IBM WCM needs lot of capacity on database and appserver.
Read full review
  • Any images in the emails sent by suppliers (supplier logos in the signature) are treated as invoices by WebCenter Content software.
  • We have an invoice with 4 lines and each line has its own project manager. Ideally, each invoice line should be sent for approval to respective project managers. However, WebCenter Business Process management was sending all the lines to all project managers.
  • The user experience of Oracle WebCenter Content can be drastically improved. It is not up to the mark.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM products always moves forward to adapt to new requirements and technologies. I have used versions 6, 6.1, 7 and 8 of IBM WCM, and I know IBM is ready to revamp the tool based on emerging needs, and still provide the capabilities to migrate your old system to the newer versions.
Read full review
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
Read full review
Usability
New versions has increased user experience facilitating usability.
Read full review
It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
Read full review
Support Rating
We had some issues related with performing and the support was suitable and sucessful.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Implementation was successful due to Websphere application server used.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Each of the options had good points and bad points. Building a site with tight integration to HCL Commerce and SAP backend systems was just easier with HCL DX. Security is also a concern and HCL DX provided better fine-grained security across the board. HCL DX also allowed us to use multiple technologies and maintain a cohesive feel across everything.
Read full review
We were looking for an automated invoice processing solution. As we are already on Oracle ERP, it made sense for us to go for Oracle Fusion payables with Oracle WebCenter Content. We have a good relationship with Oracle and Oracle promised us priority support during the time of implementation.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Unique, easy and user friendly solution that has increased business benefits such as a single repository for all company's products. It provides a better customer service.
  • A huge network of offices managed centrally increasing SEO, marketing, business and clients.
  • Employee efficiency reducing time through a single automated solution.
  • Internal communication within the company has been helped by Web Content Manager as a way of transparency, shared repository and networking with the goal of bringing teams and colleagues together.
Read full review
  • When integrated with a system like Biscom, WebCenter Content makes document capture, retention, and archiving much more efficient and cost-effective.
  • When integrated with a system like Siebel CRM, WebCenter Content makes communications with customers/leads more efficient.
  • Leveraging the robust content authoring capabilities has helped our web clients reduce the amount of involvement required of IT services during the normal course of web content authoring and management.
Read full review
ScreenShots