Hippo CMMS vs. UpKeep Maintenance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Score 7.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
UpKeep allows users to snap a picture of a broken piece of equipment, create a work order, and schedule it for repair - all from a mobile device. UpKeep is designed for facility, property, restaurant, and manufacturing managers looking to improve communication by enabling real-time status updates for their teams. The vendor says it is a modern, intuitive, and customizable CMMS that is proven to expedite workflow processes. Capabilities include: -Add co-workers and easily assign work…
$40
per technician/per month
Pricing
Hippo CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Editions & Modules
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
Starter
$40
per technician/per month
Professional
$75
per technician/per month
Business Plus
$120
per technician/per month
Enterprise
$180
per technician/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Hippo CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$600 Single UserOptional
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Hippo CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
User Ratings
Hippo CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
2.0
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.6
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Hippo CMMSUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
Very appropriate within our business since It is so easy to use and implement. The software gives the techs more accountability and ownership of jobs, along with the ability to create re-occurring work orders for inspections and checks. I now get accurate data to report against on a weekly basis, and get KPI's to set goals for our team.
Read full review
Pros
  • Tracks machine maintenance costs.
  • Keeps preventative maintenance work orders on track.
  • Keeps history of all past work orders for review in case a problem you've already dealt with comes up again.
Read full review
  • The app is very simple to use - Very user-friendly for the user, and very easy to set up.
  • The ability to upload photos, take photos and then assign the work order ticket to a vendor is great.
  • The ability to upload bids, quotes, and issues then create a PDF file that can be exported to vendors, employees, or third parties is great.
Read full review
Cons
  • Mobile App - They are improving as i type this
  • Simplified Mobile app for requester only. Not everyone needs the full CMMS
  • Notifications of comments on completed work orders - In case I don't see a comment
Read full review
  • Periodic maintenance needs are still a little tricky keeping in the system without flooding the user with too many work orders.
  • It does not immediately update all the time. For example, closing out work orders and the number of total work orders stays the same until it’s rebooted.
  • Search functions need improving.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
We love how organized it has made our processes.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
I think the platform is user-friendly but there have been some issues that colleagues have been complaining about. For example, the program tends to run slow from time to time. Reporting could be better. We could use more fields for categories under parts and assets.
Read full review
Support Rating
Customer support for Hippo CMMS has always been extremely friendly and helpful. They are quick to respond to even the simplest need.
Read full review
I cannot say enough great things about their customer service. From the start of the purchase, Upkeep was extremely helpful and informative. They have been ongoingly keeping us informed and available to answer any of our questions as they arise. They ongoing learning portal is also helpful when new features and changes happen with the interface.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Everything went as planned.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We used PMC before switching to Hippo [CMMS]. Hippo [CMMS] is much more user friendly and cost effective, and the paperless option was not even available through PMC at the time. The simplicity of entering PM's and work requests in Hippo [CMMS] is far superior to the previous system, and the customer support is much better.
Read full review
We liked the Hippo CMMS for the mapping feature - you can do an overlay of the building plan and markup the locations - but the barcode feature was not there at the time we reviewed, so there was some automation lost there. UpKeep had the barcode - but lacked the mapping. We preferred the barcode feature. Also - the mobile app for UpKeep was much more mature, and they've since added the sensors (beta) which I don't believe Hippo has yet.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Overall Hippo has had a positive impact. The annual cost is low, and the equipment has better OEE due to better maintenance due to better tracking.
  • It is easy to justify labor based on planned work and completed work. It is easy to assess the workload.
  • Maintaining equipment increases production. This is a good tool for keeping equipment in good working order.
Read full review
  • It's a bit too soon to speak of ROI, but being able to track issues over multiple service calls has proven to be useful, especially when it comes to holding workers accountable for their use of the machines.
  • It's easy to use for those who use it.
  • It's no harder to submit issues than it is to send an email. If you can send an email, you can submit an issue.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of

UpKeep Maintenance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Product Suite