Jira Work Management vs. Miro

Jira Work Management

218 Reviews and Ratings

Miro

8,629 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Jira Work Management	Score8.3 out of 10	N/A	Jira Core is Atlassian's general purpose business and project management tool available to smaller companies or teams and designed to suit a variety of purposes (e.g. marketing planning, product roadmap, etc.). In Jira Core, Workflows define process and enable teams to track tasks. Jira Core Cloud instances also have boards that let users visualize workflows and drag and drop tasks from to-do to done. It is available on the cloud.	$7.53 per month per user
Miro	Score9.2 out of 10	N/A	Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working.	$10 per month per user

Pricing

Jira Work Management

Miro

Free: $0
Starter - Monthly: $7.53
per month per user
Premium - Monthly: $13.53
per month per user
Starter - Annually: $22,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Premium - Annually: $40,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Enterprise: Contact Sales

1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free: $0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features: $8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security: $16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale: contact sales
annual billing per user

Pricing Offerings
Jira Work Management	Miro
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

No setup fee

Optional

—

Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Jira Work Management	Miro
Considered Both Products	Atlassian Verified User Chose Jira Work Management In a certain way, they are related in how to organize the information, however, working our information with Jira Work Management to have a roadmap makes it more professional, accessible, and easy to manage for any member of the team and/or interested person. For example, in Mir… Incentivized Helpful?	Miro Verified User Chose Miro I used InVision for a while - it was interesting but without many features, the work was still very manual, the tool was soon discontinued at the company I worked for. I've used FigJam, it's a good tool, but very simple in features, which is why Miro is so important, we always … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro is much more user-friendly and has a greater variety of diagramming icons and components Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro fits arbitrarily into any communications platform, but the direct integration could be stronger. Miro is more full-featured than the whiteboard features in Zoom or Teams. draw.io and Visio are a more single-user experience. Incentivized Helpful? Daniela D. Rinaldi Agile Coach in Human Resources at Tecne spa (Civil Engineering, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Miro Miro is more complete and more professional than Mural But Miro is more difficult to learn for non-expert users Miro è più completo e più professionale di Mural Ma Miro è più difficile da imparare per utenti non esperti Incentivized Helpful? Federico Romano UX Lead Designer in Information Technology at ITX (Information Technology & Services, 201-500 employees) Chose Miro We chose Miro because of a licensing issue, Miro is simply cheaper than using FigJam, but we would probably like to use FigJam the better since we use Figma and it's way better integrated than Miro to Figma. At the same time, both FigJam and XD have real time collaboration … Incentivized Helpful? Leva Lazda-Lazdiņa Product Manager in Product Management at Mintos (Financial Services, 51-200 employees) Chose Miro Whimsical was more rigid and not that customizable as I wanted. Miro is way better and more smoother. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro I prefer Miro because I have more possibilities to position the elements, lines and texts than in MindMeister. In MindMeister the editing possibilities seem more limited to me and it takes me more time to configure/customize the flows the way I need. The possibility of creating … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro is easier to learn for new teammates and is also more appropriate for general diagrams while Whimsical is specific for wireframes and screens. The new Miro screens are also a great improvement, they made the controls smaller so I have more space to view the content I am … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro is more intuitive, user friendly, and team-oriented. It is also a versatile tool that allows innovation work in a streamlined way. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro It does the basic stuff, but it's not as easy to use and missing all the advanced functionalities. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro I used Mural for the last time in 2018, and since then I've been working for organizations that use Miro. I don't really think there was a big difference between the two products that I can pinpoint, and I don't think I favor one or the other, is just a matter of what's my … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Provides much more functionality. Miro is more specific and has tools for designers to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro is far better than these two. It has more options and is better designed. It has more features, and the design feels more thought out. It’s a solid tool that makes a noticeable difference, especially for bigger, more complex tasks. What I don't really like is the Miro … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Nothing compares with Miro. I have tried to use FigJam more often but it basically leverages the same features as Figma and has a steeper learning curve for non-designers. Miro is more intuitive and user friendly. Mural and Jamboard are not close competitors to Miro since it … Incentivized Helpful? Lee Huber Senior Corporate Strategy Analyst in Corporate at Paychex, Inc. (Human Resources, 10,001+ employees) Chose Miro Miro is significantly more user friendly in my experience and significantly easier to use. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro I didn't get to choose Miro, but if I could, I would. JamBoard is not on the same level as FigJam or Miro. Between Miro and FigJam, FigJam is just more delightful to use and collaborate on—with or without an audio/video meeting. Being able to chat with collaborators from within … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Mural (good) MS Whiteboard (sucks) Incentivized Helpful? Nicholas Calvo Project Manager in Research & Development at ASP (Medical Device, 1001-5000 employees) Chose Miro Miro has more flexibility and is better than iObeya with better interfacing with external tools. Miro is well suited in my opinion for higher level planning and visualization (especially for leadership) of the items in a Jira or Smartsheet etc. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Miro is easier to use than Mural, faster and more flexible than FigJam and way more capable than draw.io Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro I've used Microsoft Whiteboard >> Miro is far superior. I've also used Frameable Whiteboard, and although it has less integration, the interface is more intuitive and natural. Incentivized Helpful? Keirstin Townsend Program Manager at Hexagon Manufacturing Intelligence (Computer Software, 5001-10,000 employees) Chose Miro More intuitive for new users, more robust capabilities. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro Before Miro, I used to use powerpoint as a whiteboard tool. It was very clunky and inefficient. I started using Miro during the lockdowns at the beginning of the pandemic and it makes collaboration so much easier. I have not used Mural. Incentivized Helpful? Maksim Kriukov Computational Scientist in Research & Development at Sanofi (Pharmaceuticals, 10,001+ employees) Chose Miro draw.io is great because it's free and has super simple UI. Moreover, you can work locally on laptop which is more stable than web version. Incentivized Helpful? Cigdem Heaver Senior Product Manager in Product Management at Star Global (Financial Services, 501-1000 employees) Chose Miro I was not involved with the selection process but I wouldnt waste my time looking for any products as Miro gives us what we need and more. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Chose Miro 7 Incentivized Helpful?
	Would buy again
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic	No answers on this topic

Features

Jira Work Management

Miro

Comparison of Project Management features of Jira Work Management and Miro
Feature	Jira Work Management 8.6 20 Ratings	Miro - Ratings
Task Management	9.420 Ratings	00 Ratings
Resource Management	8.920 Ratings	00 Ratings
Gantt Charts	7.317 Ratings	00 Ratings
Scheduling	8.818 Ratings	00 Ratings
Workflow Automation	9.019 Ratings	00 Ratings
Team Collaboration	9.420 Ratings	00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology	7.820 Ratings	00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology	8.612 Ratings	00 Ratings
Document Management	7.516 Ratings	00 Ratings
Email integration	8.416 Ratings	00 Ratings
Mobile Access	8.011 Ratings	00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking	9.011 Ratings	00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management	9.015 Ratings	00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management	9.010 Ratings	00 Ratings

Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Jira Work Management and Miro
Feature	Jira Work Management 9.0 13 Ratings	Miro - Ratings
Quotes/estimates	9.011 Ratings	00 Ratings
Invoicing	9.010 Ratings	00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting	9.012 Ratings	00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software	9.05 Ratings	00 Ratings

User Ratings
	Jira Work Management	Miro
Likelihood to Recommend	8.4 (20 ratings)	9.2 (5571 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	- (0 ratings)	9.5 (149 ratings)
Usability	8.0 (3 ratings)	9.1 (104 ratings)
Availability	- (0 ratings)	9.8 (16 ratings)
Performance	- (0 ratings)	9.0 (15 ratings)
Support Rating	- (0 ratings)	7.5 (46 ratings)
Online Training	- (0 ratings)	10.0 (4 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	9.1 (3586 ratings)
Configurability	- (0 ratings)	7.9 (9 ratings)
Ease of integration	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (3934 ratings)
Product Scalability	- (0 ratings)	8.2 (15 ratings)
Vendor post-sale	- (0 ratings)	7.2 (5 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale	- (0 ratings)	5.8 (5 ratings)