Jira Core is Atlassian's general purpose business and project management tool available to smaller companies or teams and designed to suit a variety of purposes (e.g. marketing planning, product roadmap, etc.). In Jira Core, Workflows define process and enable teams to track tasks. Jira Core Cloud instances also have boards that let users visualize workflows and drag and drop tasks from to-do to done. It is available on the cloud.
$7.53
per month per user
Wrike
Score8.3 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Wrike is a project management and collaboration software. This solution connects tasks, discussions, and emails to the user’s project plan. Wrike is optimized for agile workflows and aims to help resolve data silos, poor visibility into work status, and missed deadlines and project failures.
$240
per year 2 users (minimum)
Pricing
Jira Work Management
Wrike
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Starter - Monthly
$7.53
per month per user
Premium - Monthly
$13.53
per month per user
Starter - Annually
$22,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Premium - Annually
$40,500
per year User tier: 201-300
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Wrike Free
$0
per month per user
Wrike Team
$10
per month (billed annually) per user (2-15 users)
Wrike Business
$25
per month (billed annually) per user (5-200 users)
Wrike Enterprise
Request a quote
per month per user
Pinnacle
Request a quote
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Jira Work Management
Wrike
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Every premium plan begins with a 14-day trial period.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Jira Work Management
Wrike
Considered Both Products
Atlassian
No answer on this topic
Wrike
Verified User
Chose Wrike
As I mentioned previously, monday.com was just a bit more user friendly, and also colorful which made it easy to track several different projects. It is more aesthetically pleasing. Wrike was chosen for my company by another department, but it is still an extremely helpful …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
We are combining them. Jira primarily targeted at software development teams and IT projects. Also for more advanced issue tracking and customization capabilities. Jira offers more customization options, including custom workflows and issue types, but we don't need that for …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
Ultimately, we've decided to move our operations over to Jira. The initial choice of Wrike was driven by the management of the Marketing division; however, I had reservations about this decision from the start. Jira's capabilities seem to align more closely with our needs, …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
Wrike is much better for collaboration than Newscred.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Senior Web Developer in Marketing at Vertiv (Information Technology & Services, 501-1000 employees)
Chose Wrike
Well, Wrike is our team standard. However, the only problem are some contributors (guests) cannot collaborate. Smartsheet might be another choice for us, since Wrike is more expensive and requires all collaborators to get accounts.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
Accessible over Cloud, work on project update, anytime, anywhere.
The collaboration using the Stream, the annotation to notify users with their action items.
It is excellent for projects that are quick and result oriented. SMB businesses are well suited to adopt the tool quickly …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
Wrike is an inbetweener for me, with Trello being a basic entry level platform, but it is free.. which is great to use. Where Jira is a complex platform to use, well laid out for bigger company basses... but quite costly. I do wish that Wrike had more of a sprint task basis …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
Trello is too simplistic for the scope of the projects we manage, whereas Jira and Confluence are too confusing with too steep a learning curve. Wrike, by comparison, is as simple or as complex as you make of it and intuitive enough that no real instruction is needed on how to …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Head of Customer Marketing in Marketing at TerraCycle Inc. (Renewables & Environment, 501-1000 employees)
Chose Wrike
I did not select Wrike. It was in use when I arrived. I actually find it easier to organize and search for projects and tasks in Jira rather than Wrike. However, Wrike does seem to do a better job of reminding me when there are tasks that others have assigned to me that I am …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
I used Workfront at a previous job and found it to be overly complex and not user-friendly. I also used Jira, which I did not find as intuitive as Wrike. However, Jira did have a very useful capability to run reports on each project, showing the time that each contributor …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
The gold standard of project management, it remains my "ultimate goal" in any PMO I've been a part of our or overseen. I have yet to encounter a web-based platform that can hold a candle to the reliability and rock-solid stability of Project. There is a steeper technical …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
We are currently using all of these products. Each of them does some things really well. Confluence is great for documentation on functionality that isn't changed frequently or to define how a business unit captures metrics. GitHub is good for source control, but we use Wrike to …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Creative Technology Manager in Information Technology at Syneos Health Communications (Marketing & Advertising, 10,001+ employees)
Chose Wrike
I could list a ton more... but in reality, what has been a nice trend in this industry is that the top competing platforms with Wrike, all have adapted and added very similar features, things that didn't exist 5 years ago, are commonplace today among these listed. I would say, …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
Wrike has better integration and connectors with our actual stack. Also, the customization seems wider and more adaptable to our reality. Visually, both are great, but Wrike offer also has better customer support and services that are needed for a larger group like us. At the …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Verified User
Chose Wrike
We chose Wrike after careful software selection with three other products. The goal is to identify and define a working standard for greater efficiency during the definition, planning, execution, monitoring, and finalization of products. Wrike proved to be the best and easiest …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
Jira Work Management
Wrike
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Jira Work Management and Wrike
Feature
Jira Work Management
8.6
20 Ratings
Wrike
8.1
758 Ratings
Task Management
9.420 Ratings
9.0752 Ratings
Resource Management
8.920 Ratings
8.3635 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.317 Ratings
8.8531 Ratings
Scheduling
8.818 Ratings
8.1657 Ratings
Workflow Automation
9.019 Ratings
8.5643 Ratings
Team Collaboration
9.420 Ratings
8.8751 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.820 Ratings
7.3391 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
8.612 Ratings
8.4348 Ratings
Document Management
7.516 Ratings
7.3633 Ratings
Email integration
8.316 Ratings
7.3569 Ratings
Mobile Access
8.011 Ratings
8.1550 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
9.011 Ratings
7.6345 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
9.015 Ratings
7.723 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
9.010 Ratings
7.4266 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Jira Work Management and Wrike