JobDiva is a global applicant tracking system (ATS) and front-to-back talent management solution. JobDiva combines a CRM, synchronization with all major job boards and VMS providers, BI analytics, a mobile app, and a resume database. JobDiva also advertises unique search filters for screening resumes.
N/A
LinkedIn Talent Hub
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
LinkedIn Talent is a recruiting solution. It offers core ATS capabilities, as well as proactive recruitment outreach tailored to LinkedIn’s site. LinkedIn Talent also enables competitive insights and recruitment marketing.
JobDiva trounces Bullhorn from my experience. The user satisfaction rates don't lie, JobDiva is simply better from the user experience. Generally runs faster too.
JobDiva has been fast and easy. FileMaker took a lot longer to build the program and was slow. JobDiva also makes it easier to make your own custom changes vs. in FileMaker we would need to reach out to the developer to make changes. JobDiva has been very user-friendly and easy …
[I] used bullhorn years ago. Actively using JobDiva [for] the last 3 years. I think this is the best ATS. Every company must have this to make their work easier and highly profitable. Every user must learn JobDiva in depth so it will enhance their performance. Also, doing …
We are currently in the process of trying to link Salesforce to JobDiva CRM. It has not been a smooth integration. There is a feeling that there is more for us to utilize in Salesforce, but we can't leave behind the ATS functionality on the recruiting side. No tool is …
[I selected JobDiva because of its] Integrated search, Duplicate Candidate Prevention, Applicant Tracking, Resume management, Reports, Mail Merge, AI, etc. Everything is wonderful.
Taleo worked okay for us. At the time, it provided a way to track applicants against a job, and that was really about it. When we decided to look at JobDiva, it came at the recommendation of several other companies who were in a Mentor/Protege program with our Senior …
JobDiva is by far the most robust CRM I have used. JobDiva works with our firm to customize features for our specific needs. I would not move away from JobDiva.
Bullhorn seemed very focused on integration with LinkedIn but was missing on other factors. WinSearch was lacking as an ATS on all fronts, mass email would go to same people, there was no real prevention of duplicates and there was really no great way to link information and …
JobDiva is much more streamlined and easy to use. The database making algorithm of JobDiva is much stronger than bullhorn. JobDiva allows tracking of candidates much easier and making changes to any candidate profile is very hassle free. Searching resumes on different portals …
I like Crelate the best and I liked MaxHire also. I was not a huge fan of iCIMS, but think that Bullhorn/Maxhire were good. Out of all of the products I have used, I like Crelate and MaxHire the best. My leadership selected JobDiva and I am unsure of the reasons because I was …
The best feature that I like the most that it has one of the best search features to have, it easily put a search to work and doing it in the background and will sort out the relevant and good candidates for next day which is amazing to have because it reduces the work and …
I personally enjoy Sponsored Jobs BUT it gives you a very wide range of applicants. Many of them are not qualified for the position you are recruiting for. I would prefer quality of quantity when it comes to my hard to fill positions.
We had tried others, and thought this was be another good tool to try. LinkedIn has become a goto place for many professionals, so best utilize that. LinkedIn has a number of features, but the best part is that it is the latest trend by users and HR departments. So, many …
Dice seems to have a good database of candidates but it's not like a single integrated platform offering an end-to-end solution for recruiting. LinkedIn seems to be better in that way offering talent search, verification, and validating the authenticity of the candidates, plus …
Talent Hub is one of the best softwares out there because there are far more users using LinkedIn so it is easier to get leads for the job postings. We have used Lever and Greenhouse, which are definitely more customizable, but we did not really have a need to customize to any …
This system is very user friendly. You don't need a lot of training to dive into the system, like other systems that you have to spend time learning the ins and out of.
LinkedIn Talent is great because you get so much information on each candidate, it is easy to reach out, and you can filter based on specific skills you need for the role. It is easy to use and makes it so simple to find new employees for every department and role.
LinkedIn Talent Hub is the best software out there for making the hiring process simpler. It has helped us save time and manage the hiring process and pipeline with ease.
Adp’s recruitment package was free so it did not have what we needed for hiring analytics and automation, it simply did [not] stack up to a higher-end platform designed specifically for talent acquisition. There was no doubt LinkedIn Talent Hub was better.
I like LinkedIn Talent Hub over every software i mentioned above. It is very very dynamic and very very easy to use. Connecting with people is very easy. Posting positions is very easy. Overall it is a very great place to look for a candidate to fill up a position. Recommending …
Smart recruiters is a smaller tool, we have been working with two tools alongside, Linkedin being a larger and main one, as it is able to provide more resources when it comes to technical difficulties and support. SR tool has a more customizable interface and partners working …
The best ATS tool for all the recruitment functions, managing the job postings, and other things like onboarding and training as well. I prefer this. [It] is the best one for both job postings and hiring and managing the candidates. Everyone can use this easily. All can …
The LinkedIn Talent Hub is so much better that the other regular one. We use it when we look for a small position internally for example, we post our job posting and pay per day for 2 or 3 months, depending on how difficult the search for the candidate might be. But for …
This is the only tool we have used like it but I do not have any complaints about it and definitely would select it again. There are not really any features that are not offered.
LinkedIn Talent Hub pools talent to review, unlike other ATS in which people have to apply and upload or fill out. Talent Hub is an easier means to see careers in more depth in addition to the resume.
LinkedIn Talent Hub is a really good product in theory and mostly in use. I just feel like listening to more of the feedback and reviews from customers this could be a top of the industry product. Indeed and especially Monster and Careerbuilder are just out dated and not …
It's definitely better than other competitors because of one a better pool of candidates, who are well categorised and filtered, and the database is well updated. Also, it has a better UI with end to end hiring requirement management, that helps to make hiring faster and …
I have used Brassring a lot and it seems to work well for corporate ATS. I used it as a recruiter not a TA Manager or leader so I can't speak to those challenges or praises. Jobvite also as a recruiter but it was from a staffing agency and it was years ago though I liked it. …
We have tried to use Indeed in the past for passive sourcing. While it does work and serves its purpose, it definitely doesn't have the same ease of use or functionality as LinkedIn Talent Hub does.
Glassdoor, for a period of time, appeared to be an industry giant that was potentially going to be a large disruptor for companies looking for applicants, but ultimately the quality of the leads and overall poor interface did not make it worthwhile for our company. LinkedIn …
The functionality the platform holds is top-notch where I can house details regarding contact information, requested rates, what jobs we're submitting them to, and all the personal information (CV, certifications, degrees, etc) that we obtain from our candidates. It's extremely helpful that I am able to submit candidates externally as that is our M.O. routinely. I really like it.
In my opinion and based on my experience, if you are looking to hire professional "white collar" skill sets and establish yourself in that arena you must use LinkedIn. It is best to be very active and connect and reach out via InMails and emails to your skills sets and the groups they are in.
I am working in the staffing industry for the last 5+ years. When I joined this industry, initially we had to do all the things manually in Microsoft Excel, It is too time-consuming and looks boring.
I have been using JobDiva, for the last four years, and it works amazing.
Now my report generation is very easy and I [can] click on the go.
LinkedIn Talent provides customized templates that can be used to quickly reach out to candidates via LinkedIn InMail.
The pipeline feature allows recruiters and/or human resource directors to build, track, and manage candidates. It lets you organize candidates into folders and create lists with reminders.
You can share your activities, projects, searches, candidate profiles, and applicant notes with other people throughout the company.
InMails. The con of sending InMails is that many times you don’t get a response back. Linkedin should have a feature where a recruiter can know if their InMails was even viewed. Better mechanisms need to be put in my place for the InMails feature.
Cost. LinkedIn recruiter is not cheap. I wish the cost could be a bit lower especially if there are multiple users.
Connectifier is not helpful for global candidates. Many of the candidates that I reach out to are international. Unfortunately, Connectifier isn’t helpful in obtaining email addresses for these international candidates.
Our company is moving to a more nuanced and focused type of recruiting style and the more recruiters we bring on, the less we need to worry about aggregating large pools of resume as the recruiting team does that with better more detailed information. The more detailed our database becomes the more we build a more reliable pool of candidates and the more the slowness of the systems become more and more problematic
Its easy to use for me. but a few of my recruiters having difficulty using it. They have problems with mail merge, opting out from mail merge. They are also unable to find other options like applicants, doing some basic settings, sending mail merge again and again for the same job, avoiding sending emails to uninterested candidates etc.
The LinkedIn Talent Hub is a very easy to use and widely known by other users. If someone is hiring, its very visible and accessible. I have never had trouble posting exactly what I need. However, I have had trouble finding the candidate I am looking for. It tends to not bring in a lot of candidates
Over all I think JobDiva works well. It has some issues from time to time, but the support staff seems to handle it quickly. The major issue is the email merges getting black listed as spam. That takes away a very important JobDiva feature. That is our major functionality complaint these days
Usually, we don't come across downtime or any such issues. However, whenever required, the Support team is always up and ready to solve it as soon as possible. One of its best features is it always Notifies users of any changes related to any of its uses or new additions.
I'm giving this a 6 only because in my 1 year at my current position we have had 3 different reps. The first was unresponsive and passive when attempting to help us. When she came out to do a demo on a new feature launch it was scattered and all over the place. The person we have now is great and is super helpful when ever we need him.
This is a SaaS platform so the implementation is easy. One thing to consider is to make sure your organization has agreed to this system. Not all will like it but atleast everyone must understand how this will impact Staffing efforts in a positive way. Once everyone is bought then the rest is smooth. The reason I mention this is because after the implementation some where reluctant to change thus not maximizing JOBDIVA to its full capacity.
We are currently in the process of trying to link Salesforce to JobDiva CRM. It has not been a smooth integration. There is a feeling that there is more for us to utilize in Salesforce, but we can't leave behind the ATS functionality on the recruiting side. No tool is perfect, so we continue to look for opportunities to improve our processes.
LinkedIn Talent Hub is a really good product in theory and mostly in use. I just feel like listening to more of the feedback and reviews from customers this could be a top of the industry product. Indeed and especially Monster and Careerbuilder are just out dated and not relevant. LinkedIn Talent Hub has a great market opportunity to jump in and become a leader.
It had a positive impact of the number of candidates I was able to reach and which actually helped to increase the hiring rate at one of our clients.
The reporting system in JobDiva. It actually helped to focus more on the business objectives instead of documenting about each and every employee.
The only negative it had was that in a ew positions (asking for niche skills), when it required to submit candidates in a quick time, the other vendors were able t he win the race.
Positive ROI because it didn't cost us anything (yet). The system was chosen (not by me but I went in with an open mind) because they offered it to us for Free. The team was desperate and made a hasty decision based on cost and lack of understanding what an ATS should be capable of doing.
Negative ROI because it was a big waste of my time implementing it and finding workarounds and working with their support team on fixes and product participation meetings for them to improve the system
Negative ROI - it's been really buggy with us. I don't even know if or what jobs are in sponsored slots and there is no way for me to confirm this in the system. Even when I click on each job to view, it's giving inconsistent info to the point I don't trust it. I cannot run a report to identify which ones are being sponsored or not. This may be hurting us a lot more than I know.