| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Microsoft Project | Score8.1 out of 10 | N/A | Microsoft Project is a project management software. It provides core PM functionality, including agile workflow support and resource management. Project can be deployed in the cloud or on-premise. | $120 per year per user |
 Miro | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working. | $10 per month per user |
| Microsoft Project | Miro | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Plans are billed annually. | Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Project | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Microsoft Project Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Miro I think they all have very good features and are similar to a certain extent, however, Miro includes all the interactive features and allows you to create without limitations on format or page sizes, or oversaturation of users within the same session, which is why I appreciate … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Miro seems easier for now at least Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro Miro is a simple tool, and each card doesn't need lot of input from the user. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Miro is much easier to use, from a navigation standpoint, Miro really feels like an endless whiteboard that is easy to navigate around. ClickUp has a whiteboard that is a relatively new feature. The click-up board has fewer features than Miro but seems to handle cut and paste … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro My organization was using this, thus I am using it. But I guess overall its more flexible to work on Miro. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro I also tried Microsoft Whiteboard. Miro's quality far surpasses ANY other product in its category in terms of robust features, ease of including board collaborators, and the vast collection of available templates. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Way more user-friendly and easier to use than Microsoft products for collaboration. Permissions are easier to set than on SharePoint, multiple people can work on the same document without version control issues that often plague our teams. I will create an entire landing board … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Incentivized Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro Miro does what it does very well: infinite white board space for people to collaboratively and remotely throw ideas against the wall. Once you know what you are trying to do, though, the other tools are more useful for actioning against what was plotted in a Miro board. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Very similar products. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Microsoft Project | Miro | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Professional Services Automation |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Microsoft Project | Miro | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.7 | 9.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | 9.5 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 9.1 |
| Availability | - | 9.8 |
| Performance | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Online Training | - | 10.0 |
| Implementation Rating | 5.0 | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 7.9 |
| Ease of integration | - | 8.2 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.2 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 7.2 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 5.8 |
