| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Miro | Score9.2 out of 10 | N/A | Miro empowers cross-functional teams to flow from early discovery through final delivery on a shared, AI-first canvas. With the canvas as the prompt, Miro’s AI capabilities keep teams in the flow of work, and scale shifts in ways of working. | $10 per month per user |
 Webex App | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | The Webex App brings together Webex Calling, Meetings, and Messaging into a single application, fostering collaboration and unlocking more productive ways to work. | $0 user/month |
| Miro | Webex App | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Monthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Miro | Webex App | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose Miro I had to select Miro because of its superior integration, which works effortlessly, and its better functionality. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro Miro was the better option based on the team members' feedback, user experience, competitive pricing, look and feel, and implementation and use on projects in real-time. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro MURAL is similar, but I do not like the restriction on the project size and number of panels - Miro reduces some of these unnecessary barriers. Otherwise, I don't remember the other big differences between the two very similar product. I do think the naming is a little strange, … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro It has very similar features to the others mentioned; a lot of the basic functionality of using objects, text, and sticky notes. It seems to have the same learning curve as a result. However, we have now switched over to Figma for design and it would be nice to have more … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Miro is easier to use for 'normal' people (i.e. not designers) Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro I didn't select Miro personally, this is just the platform my university has chosen to use. But I can say that Miro is a more sophisticated and functional platform than Google Jamboard (likely because Jamboard is available freely and meant for non-enterprise use). Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose Miro Miro is a very advanced and mature platform with so many features available. It is wise to say that no other tool is having such a wide set of features and tool for effective collaboration than Miro has. It also has a huge range of integration options available unlike any other … Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Incentivized Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose Miro Miro is built for this type of collaboration and Miro blows these products out of the water for this application. There is really no comparison. Invited by the Vendor A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info | Chose Webex App Lately, Webex is adopting many features of MS Teams. Both platforms can be used interchangeably, really depends on the participants and which platform is more compatible with all so that we can expect [fewer] problems for the planning and also during the execution of the meeting. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Miro | Webex App | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Communication |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Miro | Webex App | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.5 | 9.0 |
| Usability | 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Availability | 9.8 | 8.0 |
| Performance | 9.0 | 9.9 |
| Support Rating | 7.5 | 8.2 |
| In-Person Training | - | 8.2 |
| Online Training | 10.0 | 8.5 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.1 | 6.0 |
| Configurability | 7.9 | 6.5 |
| Ease of integration | 8.2 | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | 8.2 | 7.1 |
| Vendor post-sale | 7.2 | 9.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | 5.8 | 8.0 |
