TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Oracle Marketing vs. Salesforce Marketing Cloud

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Oracle Marketing

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/AOracle CX Marketing (formerly Oracle Marketing Cloud) is a solution designed to enable marketers to plan and execute automated marketing campaigns via email, display search, video advertising, and mobile while delivering a personalized customer experience for their prospects.

    $2,000

    per month

    Salesforce Marketing Cloud

    Score8.1 out of 10
    N/AMarketing Cloud is an AI-powered, cloud-based digital marketing platform within the Salesforce Customer 360 ecosystem. Marketers can segment their audience, deliver personalized messages, track campaign performance, engage leads and accounts, and optimize strategies based on real-time insights.

    $1,250

    per month per installation

    Pricing
    Oracle MarketingSalesforce Marketing Cloud
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Account Engagement
    $1,250
    per month
    Engagement
    $1,250
    per month
    Intelligence
    $3,000
    per month
    Loyalty Management
    $20,000
    per month
    Personalization
    $100,000
    per year
    Data Cloud for Marketing
    $108,000
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Oracle MarketingSalesforce Marketing Cloud
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsCX Marketing pricing is a function of usage.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Oracle MarketingSalesforce Marketing Cloud
    Considered Both Products
    Oracle
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Oracle CX Marketing (formerly Oracle Marketing Cloud)'s Eloqua stacks up fairly well with these other tools, as they all have similar functions and features. Pricing and how seamlessly the platform integrates with a company's CRM are the main deciding factors. The customer …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Pardot does not have nearly the functionality of Eloqua. It's much more basic, but seems to pair well with Salesforce.
    Adobe Campaign does not have a logical workflow in my opinion.
    Marketo was very close to replacing Eloqua at the firm. The ease of use for a marketer is very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    While Pardot is more intuitive and less complex than Eloqua when it comes to campaign management and deploying marketing automation, if you are a larger enterprise company, you will need the API capabilities and customization options that Eloqua can provide.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    I inherited Eloqua from my predecessor, I wasn't involved in decision making process of bring Eloqua onboard.

    Eloqua perhaps is one of the best MAP systems out there in the market. It certainly is the best suited MAP tool for Enterprise level companies. However, it may not be …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Eloqua is far more advanced than Pardot. It has deeper reporting and automation capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Eloqua is more robust in my opinion. It is far more customizable and has better reporting. Pardon integrated great with Salesforce and has a great UI and has an easier learning curve than Eloqua.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Eloqua far exceeds the simplistic and constrained abilities of Pardot.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Eloqua is the true enterprise class tool compared to smaller organizations like HubSpot. We need a tool that can be approved by out stakeholders in IT, compliance etc. so the Oracle organization best suits our needs. Pardot and Marketo are always an option for the future, and …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    My company is actually moving to Pardot because it integrates better with SalesForce, which our Sales teams use. I am new to Pardot so I don't know all the details on why it is a better system, but I will say that I have personally had very few issues with Eloqua and would have …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Best value, Integrations, UI, Scalability
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    These other platforms lack the robust capabilities or ability to customize your output. These platforms are plug and play, but you can only produce within the limits of what you are allowed to. I regularly push Eloqua to do things that are not natural capabilities. I've not …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Far more customizeable and complex in all the right areas
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Offers robustness and scalability, especially with a mature open API. This is required for enterprises, complex technology stacks, and innovative marketing teams that want to challenge the status quo.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    I find ELQ to be the most well-rounded MAP on the market (without a lot of exposure to Marketo, which seems to be its one real opponent). In my opinion, Pardot and HubSpot offer similar, but less robust solutions that can be somewhat constricting.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Eloqua is the main marketing automation platform I have used. I have done thorough evaluations of other platforms/competitors but the value of Eloqua over the competitors was clear. The only other tools I have used were individuals platforms that only do small pieces of what …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    • Not good or bad.
    • Every tool has its own flexibility and complexity.
    • Eloqua can handle multiple integrations and provides a secure data transfer. But you need a developer to integrate.
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    It would be close to a tie between Marketo & Eloqua but the best of the group right now is HubSpot. While HubSpot came from an SMB background, their pace of innovation and releases has allowed them to catch up and surpass the other MAP's vendors in many areas. Pardot was …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    I have used the following marketing automation systems: Marketo and Pardot. I think that Pardot places a distant third compared to Marketo and Eloqua. But I do believe Eloqua squeaks through to the top position when compared to Marketo. I really like how I can visually see …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Oracle Eloqua is a more robust program than the other options that we considered and we are able to get much more out of the program as a company than we would have been able to from other products. The marketing, product, sales, and customer service departments utilize the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Oracle Marketing
    Pardot and HubSpot are much easier to use. The sales tools offered by these solutions are easy for the sales team to use as well.
    Incentivized
    Salesforce
    Chose Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    I haven't chosen Marketing Cloud over Eloqua, as i stand by my opinion that MC is better for database sizes of up to a million, which for Eloqua i would say goes to multiple millions of contacts. Their database set up is just a bit more intuitive and i believe offers more, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Eloqua had a more visual UI, where Pardot goes by a folder structure. Though I prefered the Eloqua interface, Pardot has a quicker refresh and you can see your changes instantly. Pardot seems to have far less "quirks" than Eloqua, so less customized solutions are required.
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Pardot is pretty much on the same level. We chose Pardot because it integrates directly with Salesforce. We already use Contentful for landing pages, so we weren't too worried about using Pardot's builder. I really liked the simplicity of the visual email workflows. Coming …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Pardot has a clean UI and UX and was very simple to use for the scope of our marketing team. Based on the size of our organization and team, Pardot had enough functionality for what we needed to do. However, if our company were to scale we would probably move to a more robust …
    Incentivized
    Chose Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Pardot out-ranks the competition in regards to the integration with Salesforce. It is hard to beat the ability to use your already-made customer profiles and contact information in your marketing campaigns. Where it is lacking is the usability. MailChimp is a much more user …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Oracle MarketingSalesforce Marketing Cloud
    Email & Online Marketing
    Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Oracle Marketing and Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Feature
    Oracle Marketing
    9.3
    133 Ratings
    Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    7.9
    167 Ratings
    WYSIWYG email editor10.0117 Ratings8.1118 Ratings
    Dynamic content9.0120 Ratings7.6149 Ratings
    Ability to test dynamic content9.0116 Ratings7.7108 Ratings
    Landing pages8.0124 Ratings7.8117 Ratings
    A/B testing10.0118 Ratings7.9147 Ratings
    Mobile optimization10.0113 Ratings7.3107 Ratings
    Email deliverability reporting10.0127 Ratings8.2128 Ratings
    List management9.0126 Ratings8.6125 Ratings
    Triggered drip sequences9.0108 Ratings8.191 Ratings
    Lead Management
    Comparison of Lead Management features of Oracle Marketing and Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Feature
    Oracle Marketing
    8.5
    118 Ratings
    Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    8.3
    121 Ratings
    Lead nurturing automation10.0110 Ratings8.3107 Ratings
    Lead scoring and grading8.0104 Ratings8.2108 Ratings
    Data quality management8.0109 Ratings8.1113 Ratings
    Automated sales alerts and tasks8.089 Ratings8.699 Ratings
    Campaign Management
    Comparison of Campaign Management features of Oracle Marketing and Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Feature
    Oracle Marketing
    9.5
    109 Ratings
    Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    7.8
    111 Ratings
    Calendaring9.094 Ratings8.3100 Ratings
    Event/webinar marketing10.099 Ratings7.394 Ratings
    Social Media Marketing
    Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Oracle Marketing and Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Feature
    Oracle Marketing
    9.5
    72 Ratings
    Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    8.2
    85 Ratings
    Social sharing and campaigns10.070 Ratings8.480 Ratings
    Social profile integration9.066 Ratings8.036 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Oracle Marketing and Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Feature
    Oracle Marketing
    8.3
    123 Ratings
    Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    8.2
    121 Ratings
    Dashboards9.0122 Ratings8.4115 Ratings
    Standard reports8.0120 Ratings8.4120 Ratings
    Custom reports8.0113 Ratings7.997 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Oracle Marketing and Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    Feature
    Oracle Marketing
    9.5
    120 Ratings
    Salesforce Marketing Cloud
    7.6
    121 Ratings
    API9.0105 Ratings7.087 Ratings
    Role-based workflow & approvals10.089 Ratings7.586 Ratings
    Customizability9.0109 Ratings7.4108 Ratings
    Integration with Salesforce.com10.088 Ratings8.3110 Ratings
    Integration with Microsoft Dynamics CRM9.048 Ratings8.713 Ratings
    Integration with SugarCRM10.037 Ratings7.610 Ratings
    Third-party software integrations00 Ratings6.921 Ratings
    User Ratings
    Oracle MarketingSalesforce Marketing Cloud
    Likelihood to Recommend
    7.0
    (246 ratings)
    8.1
    (325 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (92 ratings)
    8.1
    (114 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (15 ratings)
    4.1
    (35 ratings)
    Availability
    8.1
    (9 ratings)
    10.0
    (11 ratings)
    Performance
    6.6
    (5 ratings)
    9.6
    (9 ratings)
    Support Rating
    9.9
    (16 ratings)
    7.0
    (36 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.3
    (3 ratings)
    5.0
    (4 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.6
    (11 ratings)
    8.1
    (7 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.8
    (10 ratings)
    3.0
    (17 ratings)
    Configurability
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    2.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.5
    (120 ratings)
    7.6
    (34 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    6.4
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (3 ratings)