OnBase vs. Oracle WebCenter Content

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OnBase
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
OnBase by Hyland is an enterprise content management platform with business process and case management capabilities. It is modular by design and allows users to tailor the solution to their specific requirements.N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebCenter Content is Oracle's ECM Suite. This product is tightly integrated to other Oracle products and provides ECM functionality to Siebel CRM and PeopleSoft. The WebCenter product family also includes Oracle's CMS (WebCenter Sites) which they acquired from FatWire.N/A
Pricing
OnBaseOracle WebCenter Content
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OnBaseOracle WebCenter Content
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OnBaseOracle WebCenter Content
Considered Both Products
OnBase
Chose OnBase
I have worked with SharePoint in the past. Workview is comparable, but having the Workflow engine blows it out of the water! We have actually migrated serval SharePoint applications to OnBase because SharePoint lacked the functionality. We have a subsidiary that completely …
Chose OnBase
A core solution like Jack Henry works really well with other Jack Henry products or solutions but is not as versatile as a solution like OnBase in that it can support much different software or document solution needs.
Chose OnBase
IntelliChief (Quadrant product) was used as the first AP invoice workflow and content repository in 2006. Very hard to compare since I haven't used a current version.
RVI - Real Vision Inc. was used for Credit/Collections documents and workflow. No way to compare
Haven't had …
Chose OnBase
OnBase provided a very robust workflow process compared to others.
Chose OnBase
The version of SharePoint we were utilizing was not very practical. We oftentimes had issues with archived documents, where they could be found or opening them all together. It seemed the older the document the harder it was to access when logged into SharePoint. This is …
Chose OnBase
From what I understand after I stopped using ImageNow Hyland bought the property so I do not know that there is a difference at this point. I have not used Microsoft's Azure Data Storage but they may be poised to have a viable competitor due to the powerful tools they can …
Chose OnBase
A strength with OnBase over many other applications is the ease of the point and click configuration.
Chose OnBase
What helped in making the decision to switch to OnBase were three elements that were very important in reaching our company goals. Hyland's consistent track record of being committed to customer success, OnBase's lower total cost of ownership compared to the product used …
Chose OnBase
Perceptive Content (Used)
We switched off of Perceptive Content because their support was absolutely horrendous and the company just completely stopped innovating. Their platform didn't provide the ability to integrate like OnBase does today. There are no limits to what we can …
Chose OnBase
I did not participate in the search for this solution, so I do not know how Onbase by Hyland compares to the other products that are available. I am not familiar with other such products that can do what OnBase by Hyland is doing for us. Knowing our IT department who made the …
Chose OnBase
The city had made the decision to go with OnBase by Hyland before I got here. It seems to work well for city needs and processes.
Chose OnBase
I would say I like this system better for the housing of secure type documents as it is super safe and has security measures attached on saving and printing, and some documents are super confidential and this software allows that use better than other software I've used. I …
Chose OnBase
OnBase combines all of its features into one user-friendly platform.
Chose OnBase
I suppose that Google Drive is the closest comparable software that I have personally used. I can't say that I know enough about Google Drive from a professional use perspective to be able to compare though.
Chose OnBase
It's much easier to administrate and is very user-friendly compared to my experience with Kofax.
Chose OnBase
OnBase is a very extensible platform that can do anything as long as you're willing to pay for the add-on for it. Many of the other competitors out there do content management well but don't easily integrate, or integrate at all, with third party systems. I highly recommend …
Chose OnBase
We went with OnBase because other organizations we work with use it, so we wanted to use something similar. Also, other solutions are way more expensive.
Chose OnBase
Oracle and Seismic are two competitors that I know of. OnBase is less expensive than either. However, it is less polished than Seismic. Overall, they serve slightly different functions. OnBase is better used for overall document storage and centralization, while both Oracle and …
Chose OnBase
We selected OnBase because Hyland had purchased the company who we were using previously. We migrated all of our documents and processing workloads to OnBase about 4 years ago and have been using the product since then. We're impressed by the capabilities of the program but are …
Chose OnBase
I have never used any other products, so I can't make that decision.
Oracle WebCenter Content
Chose Oracle WebCenter Content
If you are strictly looking for an imaging solution for scanning, indexing, categorizing, etc., you may have better luck looking at alternate products such as Box. But if you already have a large Oracle footprint as we do, Oracle WebCenter Content integrates nicely with the …
Chose Oracle WebCenter Content
We were looking for an automated invoice processing solution. As we are already on Oracle ERP, it made sense for us to go for Oracle fusion payables with Oracle WebCenter Content. We have a good relationship with Oracle and Oracle promised us priority support during the time of …
Chose Oracle WebCenter Content
I was not present for any product comparisons. We switched from a Documentum system for paper records, which apparently did not have the Records Management capabilities we were looking for in place at that time. Since then, we have looking at other records management solutions; …
Chose Oracle WebCenter Content
I can't really provide an answer for this question because I think the basic premise is flawed. Which system an organization selects is based (or should be based) on their unique business and organizational requirements, not the features of the system. We do not recommend a …
Features
OnBaseOracle WebCenter Content
Enterprise Content Management
Comparison of Enterprise Content Management features of Product A and Product B
OnBase
8.2
Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle WebCenter Content
7.6
Ratings
5% below category average
Content capture & imaging9.00 Ratings7.90 Ratings
File sync, storage & archiving9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Document management10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Records management8.00 Ratings7.20 Ratings
Content search & retrieval8.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Enterprise content collaboration8.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Content publishing & creation8.20 Ratings6.90 Ratings
Security, risk management & information governance9.00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Contract lifecycle management8.40 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Automated workflows9.00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
Artificial intelligence5.80 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Mobile support7.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration7.00 Ratings8.70 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OnBaseOracle WebCenter Content
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
MediaValet
MediaValet
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OnBaseOracle WebCenter Content
Likelihood to Recommend
9.9
(0 ratings)
7.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(0 ratings)
7.9
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.6
(0 ratings)
6.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.8
(0 ratings)
5.0
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
OnBaseOracle WebCenter Content
Likelihood to Recommend
OnBase is a content services solution for organizations that need high visibility to documents or information across multiple teams or departments. It supports users' access control, workflow functionality with transaction history, electronic document retention, and destruction documentation. Hyland can support the organization for implementations or solutions, or the organization can utilize the education services and build out the solution themselves.
Read full review
If your company is large and uses other Oracle products, Oracle WebCenter Content is probably a worthwhile investment. It integrates well with other Oracle applications and has the potential to help automate some of your existing processes. If you do not use other Oracle products, I would say there are better alternatives out there that are probably more user-friendly and cost effective.
Read full review
Pros
  • Houses documents for easy retrival.
  • Allows for simple document scanning and storage.
  • Has the ability to allow paperless document import so document do not have to scanned.
  • Makes the review and document sharing process easy.
  • Has security features that allow you to keep only the staff you want to view documents able to access them.
Read full review
  • It provided one single repository with a URL link to access each AP invoice.
  • It gives a life cycle to each invoice where a business user can perform some additional indexing as per their needs.
  • It also provides a reporting feature and a front-end for users to view invoices with ease and very helpful for auditing purpose.
  • It uses the BPEL engine to customize the life cycle and also it can automate the auto entry of supplier invoices in your EBS system.
  • Reduce a lot of manual efforts, manual errors and workforce.
Read full review
Cons
  • The Administrator interface, while powerful, is antiquated and has so many options to chose from it can be overwhelming at times trying to find what you need in order to accomplish a task.
  • The Unity application is a work in progress and is missing out of some features that are much better in the thick client, such as scanning documents in at high volume. This has improved over time, though.
  • Hyland Onbase is a content management platform and, while it does handle ingestion and scanning processes, does require a 3rd party application to really complete the whole package. Hyland's Perceptive platform or Kofax Capture complement it greatly.
Read full review
  • Any images in the emails sent by suppliers (supplier logos in the signature) are treated as invoices by WebCenter Content software.
  • We have an invoice with 4 lines and each line has its own project manager. Ideally, each invoice line should be sent for approval to respective project managers. However, WebCenter Business Process management was sending all the lines to all project managers.
  • The user experience of Oracle WebCenter Content can be drastically improved. It is not up to the mark.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OnBase has become a core part of our enterprise solutions toolkit due to its ever-growing integration capabilities. Any business process that produces or tracks documents or object entities can be modeled and managed within OnBase and used to supplement almost any line-of-business system that we use.
Read full review
The challenges with converting to a completely new system create quite a barrier to switching to anything else. If we find another system that offers guaranteed improvements to the user interface -- as well as as a more coherent set of options for data interchanges with current and future enterprise data sources -- we would be more interested in swithing to that new product. Of course, the expense in purchasing competitor system, along with the costs of migrating all current content, along with retooling all existing workflows in place, would be carefully weighed against the benefits incurred from a switch-over.
Read full review
Usability
You get out of something what you put into it. You reap what you sow! If an organization will spend time setting the solution up, dedicating staff to its development and ongoing support, and always keep the end-user in mind during development, you will have one of the most well-received solutions in your organization. So many organizations that I speak with stand up a solution but don't commit someone to its upkeep and development. It is vital that you have the staff to work within the solution on a daily basis.
Read full review
It meets all required functionality requirements -- but handles none of them in an exceptional manner
Read full review
Support Rating
I have had exceptional support from Hyland; however, I am a direct customer from Hyland and receive support directly from Hyland support technicians. I have heard complaints from other customers who have partner relationships as then the support is 100% driven through the partner and you are dependent on the skills and abilities of your partner corporate support team.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
The trainer was very knowledgeable and was a Hyland employee. The training was at their corporate headquarters, so it allowed our team to become familiar with organization and culture.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
With the Premium subscription, there is a tone of training with audio and practice options.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Using Hyland professional services to assist with the implementation made things much easier. They have the knowledge and experience to get the system live as users are expecting
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
IntelliChief (Quadrant product) was used as the first AP invoice workflow and content repository in 2006. Very hard to compare since I haven't used a current version. RVI - Real Vision Inc. was used for Credit/Collections documents and workflow. No way to compare Haven't had to look for a replacement for any reason since purchasing OnBase.
Read full review
We were looking for an automated invoice processing solution. As we are already on Oracle ERP, it made sense for us to go for Oracle Fusion payables with Oracle WebCenter Content. We have a good relationship with Oracle and Oracle promised us priority support during the time of implementation.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • OnBase provides a very reliable ECM platform for the company.
  • OnBase helped to remove the dependency on paper files and file folders. This saved real estate cost as well as facilitated the ability to work from anywhere.
  • OnBase made same day processing of all incoming and outgoing documents a reality.
Read full review
  • When integrated with a system like Biscom, WebCenter Content makes document capture, retention, and archiving much more efficient and cost-effective.
  • When integrated with a system like Siebel CRM, WebCenter Content makes communications with customers/leads more efficient.
  • Leveraging the robust content authoring capabilities has helped our web clients reduce the amount of involvement required of IT services during the normal course of web content authoring and management.
Read full review
ScreenShots

OnBase Screenshots

Screenshot of an Approval for an Ad-Hoc Task.Screenshot of Onbase's Dark Mode.Screenshot of the Document Viewer.Screenshot of the Send to Department feature.Screenshot of the Workflow Stage.