Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. Webroot Endpoint Protection

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Score 7.7 out of 10	N/A	The Trend Vision One Endpoint Security platform provides antivirus and malware detection, and endpoint visibility. The product suite can be extended with associated applications that cover mobile endpoint protection, endpoint encryption, as well as network and server vulnerability protection.	$26.99 12 month subscription
Webroot Endpoint Protection	Score 8.1 out of 10	N/A	Webroot Endpoint Protection is the OpenText company's business class multi-vector endpoint protection application, providing centralized endpoint management, deep learning intelligence, and advanced behavioral analytics.	$150 per year per 5 seats

Pricing

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Editions & Modules

Trend Micro Vision One Endpoint Security Core - subscription license renewal - 1 device: $26.99
12 month subscription
Trend Micro Vision One - License - 51-250 Users - New Subscription: $35.99
12 month subscription
Trend Micro Vision One Endpoint Security Pro - subscription license - 1 device: $178.99
12 month subscription

Business Endpoint Protection: $150.00
per year per 5 seats
Business Endpoint Protection: $690.00
per year per 25 seats
Business Endpoint Protection: Contact sales team
per 50+ seats

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Free Trial
Yes	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Considered Both Products	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Honestly they are fairly similar in the nature. The biggest benefit to us as an organization was the cost and prior knowledge of the product. Both products offer a great solution so it just comes down to personal preference and cost. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Another organization was using this software and Trend micro is widely used now a days and remote support is a positive thing. Also policy and updates are always on time delivered by the vendor. Online many software were compared by SME. Incentivized Helpful? ST Starling Trinidad IT Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security For me, Trend Micro Apex One with its low performance is the best option at the time to buy a solution like this, with its flexibility through on-premises or saas deployment options you can choose the option that best fix to you, has an advanced automated threat detection and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security None. Incentivized Helpful? BY Brady Yeoman Regional IT Manager Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro is a company headquartered in the USA and provides a high-quality product with minimal impact of resources on the computers. Leaving both IT and endpoint users happy. Incentivized Helpful? SJ Shannon Johnson System Engineer Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro Apex One (formerly OfficeScan), to me, is head and shoulders above both of those products. You could take the best parts of both products combined and Trend Micro Apex One (formerly OfficeScan) is still so much more reliable, easier to manage, and trustworthy than … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security When comparing trend micro apex one to symantec endpoint protection there is a definite and stark difference. Symantec cannot find or stop viruses but it has an easy to use agent upgrade management system. On the other hand Trend micro seems to find and stop numerous viruses … Incentivized Helpful? Nathan Roberts Director, Management Information Systems Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I have evaluated several endpoint security products over the years, but Trend Micro consistently lands in the Gartner's magic quadrant of best companies in this space, reviews well, and, most tellingly, I have had great success with their products. Every iteration brings … Incentivized Helpful? David Schwartz IT Director Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Apex One beats on non-Trend Micro product by leaps and bounds, not just on price but overall functionality. When comparing it to the other Trend Micro products, it really comes down to what features you're looking for and what sort of devices you need to have covered. Either … Incentivized Helpful? LL Lee Ludlum IT Technical Support Specialist Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro Deep Security Smart Check Incentivized Helpful? Jorge Flores VIP Support Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security We have chosen Trend Micro due to the availability to migrate our physical server to the cloud. It has reduced the maintenance cost of the data center and offers the same, if not more, protection then we used to have. Also, the provider that sold us Trend Micro offers more … Incentivized Helpful? Breanna Walsemann Marketing and Advertising Consultant Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I believe Trend Micro is a much better solution than Norton. Norton allows more spam to come through whereas Trend Micro does a better job of preventing such things. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend micro has been superior compared to McAfee endpoint antivirus. It is very intuitive on what to block and what to allow. Incentivized Helpful? Tom Parker Remote Facilities Systems Support Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security The cost is lower and less resources to run Trend. Incentivized Helpful? Nathan Venno IT Manager Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I would never deploy Trend Micro on any scale to anyone ever. I work in an SMB, don't have much exposure or Internet traffic (other than the usual stuff). I just need something that will adequately protect my users without being intrusive or burdensome to run and operate. I … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security McAfee can be confusing and I do not like the licensing model. AVG is good for home use but not the best for business. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I chose Trend Micro instead of Kaspersky Work space Security because of the price. However, Kaspersky is in a much better place in the AntiVirus comparatives like: https://www.av-comparatives.org Incentivized Helpful? Ratulsnigdha Saha Network/Systems Engineer Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security The installation is very straight forward from infrastructure perspective and it's easy to maintain the product. It's easy for users to use the agent and run frequent scans on the machine as needed. It does have some very high end features if time is used to explore them, it … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security I really liked the offerings from GFI Vipre in terms of feature set and simplicity, as well as the cloud management for all clients. Another plus was the patch management feature that applied to "3rd-party" applications. I ended up staying with Trend Micro OfficeScan because … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Mostly it was an ease of deployment. At the time it had the best deployment package. Incentivized Helpful? Joe Barnett Director of Technology and Information Services Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Trend Micro stacks up very well from a technology standpoint. Pricing is higher than other competitors. Incentivized Helpful? Aaron Myers Senior Business Systems Analyst Chose Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Both Kaspersky and Symantec were less than ideal solutions that caused more problems than they fixed. They were very difficult to manage and, while fully featured, caused compatibility issues and CPU spikes that are non-existent with Trend. Incentivized Helpful?	Webroot Endpoint Protection Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We chose Webroot Endpoint Protection for its lightweight, cloud-based management and minimal impact on system performance. Compared to other solutions we tested and used, Webroot Endpoint Protection offers quick deployment, strong malware protection, and low overhead, making it … Incentivized Helpful? Stephan van der Merwe Head of SecOps Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection As previously mentioned, it does its job But seriously lacks some of the newer detection engines. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is good in a way that it is an all encompassing solution one stop shop for protecting endpoints but it needs to be managed and licensed. Some users do not need constant protection or need to have it on their machines in where the combination of Field Effect and … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I use them both. Webroot Endpoint Protection is deployed at the corporate level, but ThreatDown is added at the unit level. If I could only choose 1, Webroot Endpoint Protection would not be it. But, as I said, its price vs. performance ration might be superior to ThreatDown. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection is not as feature rich as the other products, but it is a great entry level product. Incentivized Helpful? BS Brandon Schmidt Infrastructure Engineer Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We found other products to be able to detect malware and malicious URL's better than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Thus, we moved away from Webroot Endpoint Protection. Also, over the years, there were at least 2 big mistakes by Webroot, where our business applications were … Incentivized Helpful? DM Doug Marchand IT Manager Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Microsoft Defender is very different from Webroot Endpoint Protection. To explain, Webroot Endpoint Protection must be installed locally for all devices. Microsoft has a local installation for Defender for Windows PCs. What is different is how Microsoft Defender runs on the … Incentivized Helpful? Patrick Doutre Director of Information Technology Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Less system intensive than Symantec, with a much better management setup on the backend. More robust than Microsoft Defender, though a little heavier on the resources required, but the feature comparison is night and day between the two. Defender does nicely integrate with the … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We would consider Webroot in the top 5 when you factor in ease of use, level of protection, and cost. Probably not as comprehensive as other end-point security solutions but the proper level of functionality and support for our needs. Question what impact the acquisition by … Incentivized Helpful? MS Mike Smith SR. IT Engineer Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint is just Virus Protect and a good one. Incentivized Helpful? Teri McMullen IT Solution Specialist and Sr. Account Executive Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Both Avast and Norton have caused issues with their impact on system performance. Avast recently caused a major lag on a client-server, and Symantec slows down our systems so much that we ended up recommending more memory than was generally needed. Incentivized Helpful? EM Eric Milles Help Desk Manager Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Business Endpoint Protection does not hog system resources like Norton and other products do. You don't even know it's running. A look in the task manager will show it's very low on the resource list. Incentivized Helpful? Yvonne Graber President, Owner Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is very lightweight to install and does not slow up your computer. Incentivized Helpful? MC Michael Cattano Sr. Systems Engineer Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection compares well to the other products listed. Viper, GFI and Symantec are a lot more intrusive and bloated compared to Webroot. The installation is more streamlined as well. The interface is streamlined and not full of fluff as to compared with … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Some of the other options available to us were less expensive than Webroot Endpoint Protection. Still, either required too much management on our end didn't offer multi-platform protection or didn't have all of the features we were looking for. Incentivized Helpful? Adam Friedli Level 2 Network Technician Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection With Webroot, installation is quick and doesn't require a reboot, definitions are always up-to-date without lengthy definition downloads, and the footprint makes it unnoticeable to clients. This can't be said about the other products I have used. Something would inevitably … Incentivized Helpful? Paul Li Senior Associate Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot Endpoint Protection beats the competition in various aspects. Webroot provides an easy web portal management of protected devices. Installation occurs very easily on all devices. Furthermore, the price to protect a workstation vs a server is one and the same. Incentivized Helpful? CR chuck rogers Owner, CTO & Managing Operator Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I can tell you that the Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is much better than the competition in three primary areas. Number one; they are the smallest footprint so as not to decrease the performance of the endpoint. Number two; Webroot Business Endpoint Protection is very … Incentivized Helpful? Hunter Bonner Technology Consultant Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Way better, and frankly, no Russian involvement. Incentivized Helpful? James Buchholz Service Manager Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is extremely light on the system resources and incredibly quick to install. From what I've seen it's just as good for malware as Kaspersky and ESET. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Way too heavy of an application. Webroot is a lot lighter and easier to use. Kaspersky overloads the system and pops up at the worst possible time, while Webroot just runs in the background doing its thing. Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot has been a much better asset both financially and in overall general use. Compared to Avast and Kaspersky, its been a much better decision that fits into our budget, and compared to Norton, it definitely uses a lot less resources on the endpoint. Norton tended to make … Incentivized Helpful? Verified User Anonymous Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection I think that the AV clients are more light weight than the others which makes running on older slower computers more manageable. Also Cloud manamgenet is a huge, huge plus. Incentivized Helpful? Ron Fenili Systems Administrator II Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection We looked at Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Norton. Webroot is usually No.1 or 2 based on ratings and user reviews/feedback. Easy to deploy and managability were also key to choosing Webroot. Incentivized Helpful? JB Jim Bolinski President Chose Webroot Endpoint Protection Webroot is a player, not as mature as others, however, has a favorable price point Incentivized Helpful?

Features

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security

Webroot Endpoint Protection

Endpoint Security

Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security 8.1 Ratings 6% below category average	Webroot Endpoint Protection 7.6 Ratings 12% below category average
Anti-Exploit Technology	7.00 Ratings	8.80 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)	9.00 Ratings	9.00 Ratings
Centralized Management	10.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support	8.00 Ratings	7.10 Ratings
Infection Remediation	7.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management	7.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings
Malware Detection	9.00 Ratings	7.00 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Small Businesses	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10	ThreatLocker Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10	CrowdStrike Falcon Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10	BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management Score 9.8 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend	8.0 (0 ratings)	7.5 (0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew	8.0 (0 ratings)	10.0 (0 ratings)
Usability	9.0 (0 ratings)	9.0 (0 ratings)
Support Rating	8.0 (0 ratings)	9.5 (0 ratings)
Implementation Rating	- (0 ratings)	7.8 (0 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security	Webroot Endpoint Protection
Likelihood to Recommend	I think Trend is well suited for businesses that need an all-in-one malware/antivirus/EDR solution. It works well and runs smoothly in the background not hindering the users. Our only issue with it is the use of it and secure browsers for state testing. The EDR wants to automatically blocked the use of secure browsers setup by the state. Incentivized JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Read full review	The software tends to do a good job of basic protection but is not the best for larger clients and is not as powerful as some others offered on the market today. The support is not the best either, have had a hard time getting assistance in the past trying to resolve issues. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Pros	End point implementation: the roll-out of Trend Micro was extremely easy! Server/Device policies: creating both endpoint and server device policies is something we were looking for in a system, since we have a variety of both endpoints with users, as well as several unattended servers needing specific limitations. License Management: removing Trend Micro from machines before destruction or retirement is done in a pinch. There's no struggling to free up an unused license Incentivized David Schwartz IT Director Read full review	Webroot Endpoint Protection works very well at blocking threats quickly and can undo changes if a file turns out to be harmful, which has helped us in the past. It runs quietly in the background without slowing down endpoints, even during scans, which is great. You can manage all your devices from one online dashboard, making it easy to set rules and see security alerts. One pane of glass is always great. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Cons	Only thing I would have to say that's negative is the reporting aspect. Basic reporting is good but still lacks some details. This is a problem with many of the software vendors I have encountered in the past as well. Reporting is still much better than most. Incentivized SJ Shannon Johnson System Engineer Read full review	It was missing detections. We found a better product that detects more malware. Deploying the endpoint agents was easy, but deploying Web Threat Shield was not and users could disable that functionality. When you deactivated old endpoints, they were put in an "inactive" category. You could not then delete the "inactive" endpoints. For someone who likes to keep things clean, this was annoying. I found the rollout of endpoint agent updates to be rather slow. Incentivized BS Brandon Schmidt Infrastructure Engineer Read full review
Likelihood to Renew	It is very easy to stick with a vendor year after year, and it is also easy to see the faults in a product and want to change. This is the first time I have renewed with an antiviurs provider as others have been less than ideal and caused issues where there were none before, so while it isn't perfect, it is the best of the bunch currently and I am hopeful that it will continue to improve in future versions. Incentivized Aaron Myers Senior Business Systems Analyst Read full review	It has proven successful so far in our environment for controlling malware/virus outbreaks. Incentivized Ron Fenili Systems Administrator II Read full review
Usability	The dashboard is user-friendly and allows for an IT admin to quickly deploy the software. The users do not even notice the program running in the background. From the dashboard the IT department can monitor all the workstations for issues and maintain good health of the network. Incentivized JJ Justin Johnson Information Technology Director Read full review	It does what it needs to do but we have noticed that malware is sort of uncommon and we have started to switch to other solutions of combating malware and suspicious activity such as using products like ThreatLocker and Field Effect, combined with things like malware bytes to perform scans when needed. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Support Rating	It has been difficult at sometimes, the support people at one point told me that they couldn't tell me information about OfficeScan because it was knowledge that was passed down from engineer to engineer. The issue was that if you used the msi for the install any further installs would require the msi to have the same exact name or else the install fails and corrupts the install. This information is not listed anywhere on trends website. Support kept trying to get me to use the exe for installs instead, but we use SCCM and msi's work better. We had to write a script to come up with a solution so that we could uninstall the software and install the new software. Trend did provide the technical expertise to help with the script and had us work with one of the developers in order to resolve that issue. So they did fix their screw up but it took a while and several complaints. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Support has been reliable up to this point. A request can easily be generated via the console and support responding in a reasonable time. We have not had any major issues other than the basic agents not communicating with the console and the like. Incentivized MC Michael Cattano Sr. Systems Engineer Read full review
Implementation Rating	No answers on this topic	I had some difficulties with remote users. I ended up needing to open a remote tech support session and finish the process. Other than a few speed bumps, I was impressed with the engineering of the install. Because of time differences, I was done installing in two days. The cost, per license, could be less. Incentivized DM Doug Marchand IT Manager Read full review
Alternatives Considered	When comparing trend micro apex one to Symantec Endpoint Protection there is a definite and stark difference. Symantec cannot find or stop viruses but it has an easy to use agent upgrade management system. On the other hand Trend micro seems to find and stop numerous viruses including things that are not viruses. And the upgrading used to be an issue but it is supposed to be better now, in apex one Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	We would consider Webroot in the top 5 when you factor in ease of use, level of protection, and cost. Probably not as comprehensive as other end-point security solutions but the proper level of functionality and support for our needs. Question what impact the acquisition by OpenText is having on future development and support. OpenText also acquire Carbonite for back-up support. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Since the product is a full suite of protection rolled into a single product, we've seen ROI through cost reduction and simplified management. And while we haven't measured performance, one would logically assume that systems will perform better with a single product installed vs several. While we haven't measured performance, one would logically assume that systems will perform better with a single product installed vs several. Incentivized Nathan Roberts Director, Management Information Systems Read full review	It saves us time and money in the fact that it runs and we never really have to worry about that part of IT. IT just runs Being able to centrally manage the clients is another plus because of being able to reach it virtually anywhere. Very simple quick installs. Gives us time to do other things. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
ScreenShots	Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Screenshots