Asana vs. UpKeep Maintenance Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Asana
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Asana is a web and mobile project management app. With tasks, projects, conversations, and dashboards, Asana lets an entire team know who's doing what by when, enabling workload balancing. Users can also add integrations for GANTT charts, time tracking and more.
$13.49
per month per user
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Score 7.0 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
UpKeep allows users to snap a picture of a broken piece of equipment, create a work order, and schedule it for repair - all from a mobile device. UpKeep is designed for facility, property, restaurant, and manufacturing managers looking to improve communication by enabling real-time status updates for their teams. The vendor says it is a modern, intuitive, and customizable CMMS that is proven to expedite workflow processes. Capabilities include: -Add co-workers and easily assign work…
$40
per technician/per month
Pricing
AsanaUpKeep Maintenance Management
Editions & Modules
Starter
$13.49
per month per user
Advanced
$30.49
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Personal
Free
Starter
$40
per technician/per month
Professional
$75
per technician/per month
Business Plus
$120
per technician/per month
Enterprise
$180
per technician/per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AsanaUpKeep Maintenance Management
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional DetailsA discount is offered for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AsanaUpKeep Maintenance Management
Considered Both Products
Asana
Chose Asana
Asana is much better than both of these other options. Timelines and status updates are very integrated into the software and are easy to use.
Chose Asana
Asana is better for the teams who seeks strealined, easy to use user interfaces with less complexity .

Which makes Asana a go to PMS to get things done rather then spending whole time on understanding about how feature works.
Chose Asana
For us, ClickUp was only implemented by department whereas Asana was implemented organization wide.
Chose Asana
Overall for the money Asana brings a lot of value for organizations who want to do more with less and need a task and project management solution as a small company is growing and scaling to get to the next level. In the space when we evaluated didn't find a lot of other …
Chose Asana
Look and feel of monday.com is better, but Asana has more features and capabilities making it the better option.
Chose Asana
Against Jira it offers a more modern experience with less complex user interfaces. The admin and setup experience is also way faster with less (or no) legacy complexity.

Against other modern players like Linear and Basecamp it offers way more integrations so we can pull in data …
Chose Asana
The pricing point my understanding is better, we do have the enterprise level
Chose Asana
Asana is a top-tier project management software that helps us organize and track projects from start to finish. It allows us to apply tasks/to-dos to multiple projects without duplication, divide complex projects into smaller tasks, and track project progress. It also helps us …
Chose Asana
Asana provides a mix of features between notion and Jira. Unlike Notion, it helps ease up the collaboration on vast projects and between multiple teams. Jira proved to be a little expensive with similar set of features if not more and which is why we thought of going with Asana.
Chose Asana
I believe that Asana is more professional than Trello. I used Trello a long time ago, but it looked more suitable for a student project rather than for a professional team or business environment. I believe it has great features to help companies in different stages and of …
Chose Asana
Since I have tried the two applications and saw their advantages and disadvantages, I see that Asana is much better in terms of dealing with files, ease of use, and the many features and characteristics that it has. Also, I noticed that it does not consume much space on my …
Chose Asana
Some features are better; some are too much. Not huge differences.
Chose Asana
Side by side with the other two Asana by far beats Monday.com and is comparable and slightly better than ClickUp. Monday is completely browser-based and is hard to navigate and figure out how to set up. Asana and ClickUp are the exact opposite. Both are easy to set up and …
Chose Asana
I like how extensive the capabilities are for Asana. With other softwares it seems there are many things lacking. I feel like Asana is also a very user friendly platform and aesthetically pleasing which is important in a modern office. We have many young people entering our …
Chose Asana
Asana compared to Jira is certainly better in terms of user experience, since most of the people can start using it basically without having any kind of training or previous explanation, which makes it really useful not only for people already used to project management but …
Chose Asana
Asana is amazing for a remote team, that we are currently as its accessible seamlessly to all our team member no matter where they are in the world. Its very easy to onboard new members to this platform as its very intuitive and easy for new people to get a hang of it. It has …
Chose Asana
Basecamp was a great tool, but it was paid and things like recurring tasks and opening new projects was a pain. Asana, as a free tool, has been better for our organization as it serves the basic functions very well and is not complicated otherwise. I really like the …
Chose Asana
I still can't figure out how Trello works. Asana is very intuitive.
Chose Asana
Asana is one of the good going project management tools in the market. It has a great user interface with high performance. Its project dashboard management is handy when compared to other products.
Chose Asana
Asana does well at the assignment of tasks and task management, but it is not a resource planning tool. Other tools do better at resource planning and some principles of agile/scrum. It is simple and easy to use within the mobile application and on desktop, but it doesn't have …
UpKeep Maintenance Management
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We liked the Hippo CMMS for the mapping feature - you can do an overlay of the building plan and markup the locations - but the barcode feature was not there at the time we reviewed, so there was some automation lost there. UpKeep had the barcode - but lacked the mapping. We …
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Previously had MEX, though had not implemented it throughout the business. It was way too difficult for the techs to use on the fly and was just a nightmare to implement. UpKeep, on the other hand, is a walk in the park.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
I selected UpKeep because of the glowing reviews I found online.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
UpKeep has many superior functions over more traditional, open-source type maintenance management programs. The biggest advantage is the availability of mobile apps. The software is much more intuitive as well.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
It's been about 5 1/2 years since I used Astea, but it was cumbersome and poorly designed back then. I used it as a basis for what I didn't want to inflict on my fellow workers.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Upkeep is a faster cleaner system than a maintenance connection with a great mobile option for my technicians. The user interface for reports and PM creation is fast and easy. It has more functionality than eMaint and works very well for all the things we needed a CMMS to do in …
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We have used Fixx, which is a great product but having separate assets is what changed the game for us.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Cleaner UI
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Superior product, easier to use and navigate. More responsive customer service, better pricing.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We use UpKeep because of the price and ease of use. They have knowledgable staff that knows how to get this program started on time and have people directed to achieve start-up.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Maintenance Connection had issues with reminders and they couldn't get them fixed for me, so I went with UpKeep.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
It may be a larger challenge for the internal office workers to utilize upkeep. Often times when you're hiring property managers, maintainers, they may not be orientated towards technology. We can learn how to utilize something new if it presents a larger challenge. We want our …
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We researched numerous other programs and all of them fell short in one way or another. Ideally, we would like to integrate our accounting processes with UpKeep, but we aren't there yet as our present accounting software is not compatible.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
Hippo wasn't as simple, and it was far more expensive.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
I feel that UpKeep is a superior program. It has more features and is more user-friendly.
Chose UpKeep Maintenance Management
We were originally looking towards "Dynaway" as it is easily integrated into the AX platform. I was able to run a trial version and found that it is far more detailed and requires training to use. UpKeep is very user-friendly and intuitive. It allows users of almost any skill …
Features
AsanaUpKeep Maintenance Management
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Asana
8.2
Ratings
7% above category average
UpKeep Maintenance Management
-
Ratings
Task Management9.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Scheduling8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Team Collaboration9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Document Management7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Email integration7.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Access8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking6.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Asana
6.7
Ratings
12% below category average
UpKeep Maintenance Management
-
Ratings
Project & financial reporting5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software7.90 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AsanaUpKeep Maintenance Management
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AsanaUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.6
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Usability
7.9
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AsanaUpKeep Maintenance Management
Likelihood to Recommend
The usability of Asana is broad since it's available in a variety of platforms that are widely used nowadays. I think that it would be great for people who are constantly on the move and switching devices, since it has allowed me to work from my phone, too. I also think that Asana has proven itself to handle a large quantity of work
Read full review
Very appropriate within our business since It is so easy to use and implement. The software gives the techs more accountability and ownership of jobs, along with the ability to create re-occurring work orders for inspections and checks. I now get accurate data to report against on a weekly basis, and get KPI's to set goals for our team.
Read full review
Pros
  • Easy to use by any user (good UX and no installation needed)
  • Easy to create a simple project, add tasks and sub tasks.
  • Different display options, according to the project/tasks type
  • Works great using a web browser, you don't have to install the application
Read full review
  • The app is very simple to use - Very user-friendly for the user, and very easy to set up.
  • The ability to upload photos, take photos and then assign the work order ticket to a vendor is great.
  • The ability to upload bids, quotes, and issues then create a PDF file that can be exported to vendors, employees, or third parties is great.
Read full review
Cons
  • Some users might find the user interface a bit dull and un inspired
  • We found the way to use multiple workspaces a bit confusing
  • It takes quite a bit of planning to build a well organized workspace in order not to have way too many projects and tasks all over the place
Read full review
  • Periodic maintenance needs are still a little tricky keeping in the system without flooding the user with too many work orders.
  • It does not immediately update all the time. For example, closing out work orders and the number of total work orders stays the same until it’s rebooted.
  • Search functions need improving.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
I just can't see us getting it off of Asana any time soon, despite the many headaches it has caused us. We have too much data in there, too much time & training invested into it, too much at stake to move. If we were just starting out today, fresh, I don't know for certain that I would absolutely go the same direction, but I *think* I still would. I just haven't seen anything better yet. Maybe if Podio's support staff hadn't treated me like a worthless nuisance to them, I might feel differently, but the fact is that their task management is simply inferior to Asana's. That can't be denied, and in fact Podio said it themselves: "Tasks are a simple function. They cannot be customized. Tasks in Podio can be used for quick to-do's for you and your team members." In our operation, however, prompt task completion is a big deal; one task can't be completed until another one is done first, and closing the gaps between those tasks is critical in meeting deadlines and servicing our customers. Asana gets us there, the others don't.
Read full review
We love how organized it has made our processes.
Read full review
Usability
It is very user-friendly. Takes a new employee an hour to start figuring out how the system works. That's an important factor. You don't want to encounter the issue where employees need a week to understand how the system works. For example, JIRA, I tried using it for a week and I still don't understand the complicated layout. Asana has a simple interface. Once you see it, you get it type of program.
Read full review
I think the platform is user-friendly but there have been some issues that colleagues have been complaining about. For example, the program tends to run slow from time to time. Reporting could be better. We could use more fields for categories under parts and assets.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Working with Asana on a daily basis
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I haven't had to use their support so I can't rate it. The fact that I haven't needed them reflects the ease of use of the product. I would recommend that any new users schedule a complete demo of the product to ensure that they are using it to it's fullest (there's a lot of useful features).
Read full review
I cannot say enough great things about their customer service. From the start of the purchase, Upkeep was extremely helpful and informative. They have been ongoingly keeping us informed and available to answer any of our questions as they arise. They ongoing learning portal is also helpful when new features and changes happen with the interface.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Everything went as planned.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Asana is a top-tier project management software that helps us organize and track projects from start to finish. It allows us to apply tasks/to-dos to multiple projects without duplication, divide complex projects into smaller tasks, and track project progress. It also helps us organize work on Kanban boards or linear lists. It stands out from the crowd in a big way compared to the competition.
Read full review
We liked the Hippo CMMS for the mapping feature - you can do an overlay of the building plan and markup the locations - but the barcode feature was not there at the time we reviewed, so there was some automation lost there. UpKeep had the barcode - but lacked the mapping. We preferred the barcode feature. Also - the mobile app for UpKeep was much more mature, and they've since added the sensors (beta) which I don't believe Hippo has yet.
Read full review
Scalability
I used this tool on a daily basis at work and it runs as a solid rock
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Difficulty adding large projects with multiple and complex levels of tasks.
  • The number of users is limited in the free version. The service cannot be used for groups of less than 5 people.
  • The search filter is not a powerful feature, it needs some development and strength because it contains some bugs sometimes.
Read full review
  • It's a bit too soon to speak of ROI, but being able to track issues over multiple service calls has proven to be useful, especially when it comes to holding workers accountable for their use of the machines.
  • It's easy to use for those who use it.
  • It's no harder to submit issues than it is to send an email. If you can send an email, you can submit an issue.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Asana Screenshots

Screenshot of Product HomepageScreenshot of Team ConversationsScreenshot of Project CalendarsScreenshot of InboxScreenshot of List ProjectScreenshot of Portfolios

UpKeep Maintenance Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Product Suite